Neeha Gogoi

1,1,1‐trifluoroethyl methyl carbonate (FEMC) is a popular non‐flammable solvent for lithium‐ion battery electrolytes, although its high irreversible capacity means it can only be used with film‐forming additives like fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). This work studies the origin of the high irreversible capacity of FEMC‐containing cells. Scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy of graphite anodes after charging and discharging in an FEMC electrolyte show evidence of significant physical and chemical graphite degradation, likely caused by solvent co‐intercalation, which is probably responsible for a large portion of the capacity loss. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the anodes shows very low graphite signals, a sign of graphite degradation, formation of a thick solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), or both. When a small amount of FEC is added to FEMC, co‐intercalation does not occur. FEC reduction occurs at a higher potential versus Li/Li⁺ than FEMC co‐intercalation. It also forms a significantly different and thinner SEI containing more carbon, less fluorine, and no apparent FEMC decomposition products.

Vinylene carbonate (VC) is the most commonly applied performance-enhancing electrolyte additives in Li-ion batteries to date. Despite numerous studies, there is a lack of consensus regarding the various reaction pathways of VC and their implications. VC has primarily been observed to either polymerize forming poly(vinylene carbonate) (poly(VC)) or decompose releasing major amounts of CO₂, two seemingly contradictory processes. Herein, we present evidence of additional reaction pathways of VC highlighting its role as a H₂O scavenging agent. In contrast to the typical electrolyte solvent ethylene carbonate, VC reacts much more rapidly with water impurities, especially when in contact with hydroxides, forming products less likely to influence cell performance. Efficient removal of water and hydroxides is essential to preserve the stability of Li-ion electrolyte solvent and salt, hence guaranteeing a long lifetime of the battery. Model studies pinpointing reaction pathways of electrolytes and additives, as presented herein, are critical not only to improve modern Li-ion cells but also to establish design principles for future battery chemistries.

Aqueous lithium‐ion batteries (ALIBs) are promising for large‐scale energy storage systems because of the cost‐effective, intrinsically safe, and environmentally friendly properties of aqueous electrolytes. Practical application is however impeded by interfacial side‐reactions and the narrow electrochemical stability window (ESW) of aqueous electrolytes. Even though higher electrolyte salt concentrations (e.g., water‐in‐salt electrolyte) enhance performance by widening the ESW, the nature and extent of side‐reaction processes are debated and more fundamental understanding thereof is needed. Herein, the interfacial chemistry of one of the most popular electrode materials, V₂O₅, for aqueous batteries is systematically explored by a unique set of operando analytical techniques. By monitoring electrode/electrolyte interphase deposition, electrolyte pH, and gas evolution, the highly dynamic formation/dissolution of V₂O₅/V₂O₄, Li₂CO₃ and LiF during dis‐/charge is demonstrated and shown to be coupled with electrolyte decomposition and conductive carbon oxidation, regardless of electrolyte salt concentration. The study provides deeper understanding of interfacial chemistry of active materials under variable proton activity in aqueous electrolytes, hence guiding the design of more effective electrode/electrolyte interfaces for ALIBs and beyond.

Aqueous lithium ion batteries (ALIBs) are promising candidates for large-scale energy storage systems, benefiting from the intrinsic safe and environmentally friendly properties of aqueous electrolytes. However, its practical application is impeded due to the narrow electrochemical stability windows (ESWs) of aqueous electrolytes. Despite that increasing electrolyte concentration can achieve a wide ESW with the protection of SEI layer, it brings numerous disadvantages induced by excessive salt as well. Therefore, understanding the SEI formation mechanism and further widening the ESWs of dilute aqueous electrolytes are critical for the breakthrough of next-generation ALIBs. Herein, the interphase chemistry of V₂O₅ electrode with dilute aqueous electrolyte was systematic investigated by conducting various Operando characterizations with LMO||V₂O₅ cell system. Dynamic SEI, which consists of Li₂CO₃, LiF and V₂O₄, was formed during charge and disappeared during the following discharge, which is strongly affected by electrolyte pH fluctuation. Moreover, its evolution process is reversible during cycling. There are several impacts affect the pH fluctuation during cycling. First, V₂O₅ dissolution, which turns electrolyte into acidic before cycling, and is aggravated by electrolyte concentration decrease. Second, proton/hydronium ion insertion, which takes place on electrode surface in dilute electrolyte, while it is suppressed by concentration increase due to reduced proton concentration. Third, the redox reaction of dissolved V₂O₅, which is controlled by both potential and electrolyte pH change according to the V-H₂O poubaix diagram. Along with the anode potential decrease and the alkalinisation of electrolyte, V₂O₄ is formed on anode surface by the reduction of HV₁₀O₂₈ ^5- and V₄O₁₂ ^4- and this reduction process further produces hydroxide ion into electrolyte. Last, the carbon oxidation, which takes place on cathode side during charge and on anode side during the final discharge. Therefore, the acidification of electrolyte during cycling is detrimental to SEI stability in aqueous electrolytes. This systematic research work provides new perspectives to the understanding of the interphase chemistry evolution in aqueous Li-ion batteries using dilute electrolytes, which guides the building of effective SEI layer in aqueous Li-ion batteries and beyond. Figure 1

Ethylene carbonate (EC) is the archetype solvent in Li-ion batteries. Still, questions remain regarding the numerous possible reaction pathways of EC. Although the reaction pathway involving direct EC reduction and SEI formation is most commonly discussed, EC ring-opening is often observed, but seldomly addressed, especially with respect to SEI formation. By applying Online Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry, the EC ring-opening reaction on carbon is found to start already at ∼2.5 V vs Li⁺/Li as initiated by oxygenic carbon surface groups. Later, OH⁻ generated from H₂O reduction reaction at ∼1.6 V further propagates EC to ring-open. The EC reduction reaction occurs <0.9 V but is suppressed depending on the extent of EC ring-opening at higher potentials. Electrode/electrolyte impurities and handling conditions are found to have a significant influence on both processes. In conclusion, SEI formation is shown to be governed by several kinetically competing reaction pathways whereby EC ring-opening can play a significant role.

The initial formation cycles are critical to the performance of a lithium-ion battery (LIB), particularly in the case of silicon anodes, where the high surface area and extreme volume expansion during cycling make silicon susceptible to detrimental side reactions with the electrolyte. The solid electrolyte interface (SEI) that is formed during these initial cycles serves to protect the surface of the anode from a continued reaction with the electrolyte, and its composition reflects the composition of the electrolyte. In this work, ReaxFF reactive force field simulations were used to investigate the interactions between ether-based electrolytes with high LiTFSI salt concentrations (up to 4 mol/L) and a silicon oxide surface. The simulation investigations were verified with galvanostatic testing and post-mortem X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, revealing that highly concentrated electrolytes resulted in the faster formation and SEIs containing more inorganic and silicon species. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding the link between electrolyte composition and SEI formation. This ReaxFF approach demonstrates an accessible way to tune electrolyte compositions for optimized performance without costly, time-consuming experimentation.

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is arguably one of the most critical components of the Li‐ion cell. Despite decades of studies of the SEI, its intrinsic complexity and the lack of suitable characterization tools still prevent a real consensus on the governing mechanisms to be reached. Herein, operando Raman spectroscopy supported by complimentary online electrochemical mass spectrometry is employed to study the SEI formation on Au in a model electrolyte based on LiClO₄ in ethylene carbonate (EC). Both the electrolyte itself and cell contaminants, such as O₂, CO₂, and H₂O, contribute in stepwise electro‐/chemical processes to the build‐up of the SEI. Effects associated with electrode/electrolyte double‐layer charging, electrode adsorbate polarization (stark effect), and SEI dissolution are discerned. Lithium carbonate and lithium oxide are identified as major products formed already ≈2 V versus Li⁺/Li. Although Raman spectroscopy provides deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms, complementary techniques are necessary to support spectral interpretations. Classical challenges in the field of surface science, such as contaminations, have to be systematically addressed if the puzzle of the SEI ever will be completed.

Silyl groups are included in a wide range of electrolyte additives to enhance the performance of state-of-the-art Li-ion batteries. A recognized representative thereof is tris-(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (TMSPa) which, along with the similarly structured phosphite, has been at the center of numerous electrolyte studies. Even though the silyl group has already been widely reported to be specifically reactive towards fluorides, herein, a reactivity towards several Lewis bases typically found in Li-ion cells is postulated and investigated with the aim to establish a more simplified and generally applicable reaction mechanism thereof. Both gaseous and electrolyte soluble reactants and products are monitored by combining nuclear magnetic resonance and injection cell-coupled mass spectrometry. Experimental observations are supported by computational models. The results clearly demonstrate that the silyl groups react with water, hydroxide, and methoxide and thereby detach in a stepwise fashion from the central phosphate in TMSPa. Intermolecular interaction between TMSPa and the reactants likely facilitates dissolution and lowers the free energy of reaction. Lewis bases are well known to trigger side reactions involving both the Li-ion electrode and electrolyte. By effectively scavenging these, the silyl group can be explained to lower cell impedance and prolong the lifetime of modern Li-ion batteries.