Nick Wuestenenk
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Nick Wuestenenk has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Frank van Tubergen
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
2 shared publicationsTobias H. Stark
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
2 shared publications- Frank van Tubergen
Utrecht University
1 shared publication - Katia Begall
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Sociol, Thomas Aquinostr 4, NL-6525GD Nijmegen, Netherlands
1 shared publication Naomi Ellemers
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
1 shared publication- Naomi Ellemers
Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Social Networks
- Vol. 80, 25-35
The interplay of misperceptions and willingness to share opinions in full classroom networks: The case of opinions towards homosexuality
- 16 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Social Networks
- Vol. 80, 25-35
Open AccessThe interplay of misperceptions and willingness to share opinions in full classroom networks: The case of opinions towards homosexuality
- Open Access
- 25 June 2024
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 52 (1) , 3-31
How Do Personal Opinions Relate to Online Expressions? An Experimental Study Among Muslim Minority Groups in The Netherlands
There has been much debate about how cultural differences between ethnic groups may affect the cohesion of multicultural societies. Still, we know little about the extent to which cultural differences between groups also materialize into behavioral differences, especially in online settings. To study this, we conducted an experiment in which second-generation Moroccan and Turkish Dutch participants first indicated their personal opinion on sexual liberalism, and then participated in discussions on this topic on an online platform. On the discussion platform, participants were randomly assigned to either a progressive, conservative or mixed online discussion. Overall, we found that the convergence between personal opinions and online expressions was stronger for progressive than for conservative participants. Additionally, conservatives (but not progressives) were less likely to express their personal opinions, and more likely to deviate from their personal opinions, when they were exposed to an incongruent versus congruent online environment.
- 25 June 2024
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 52 (1) , 3-31
Open AccessHow Do Personal Opinions Relate to Online Expressions? An Experimental Study Among Muslim Minority Groups in The Netherlands
There has been much debate about how cultural differences between ethnic groups may affect the cohesion of multicultural societies. Still, we know little about the extent to which cultural differences between groups also materialize into behavioral differences, especially in online settings. To study this, we conducted an experiment in which second-generation Moroccan and Turkish Dutch participants first indicated their personal opinion on sexual liberalism, and then participated in discussions on this topic on an online platform. On the discussion platform, participants were randomly assigned to either a progressive, conservative or mixed online discussion. Overall, we found that the convergence between personal opinions and online expressions was stronger for progressive than for conservative participants. Additionally, conservatives (but not progressives) were less likely to express their personal opinions, and more likely to deviate from their personal opinions, when they were exposed to an incongruent versus congruent online environment.
- Open Access
- 27 May 2023
- Published by SAGE Publications in New Media & Society
- Vol. 27 (1) , 225-245
The influence of group membership on online expressions and polarization on a discussion platform: An experimental study
Despite much attention for group polarization in online environments, little is known about how group membership affects online behavior. We designed an online platform where ethnic minority and majority users in the Netherlands participated in discussions about controversial topics (homosexuality and abortion). Participants were randomly assigned to either progressive, conservative, or mixed discussions on these topics, which were ostensibly held among ethnic minority or majority users. We find that when ethnic minority users are exposed to discussions among the ethnic majority (i.e., outgroup) with which they disagree, they are less likely to express their opinions and more likely to deviate from their personal opinions. Among ethnic majority users, we find the opposite: when confronted with a discussion among the ethnic minority with which they disagree, they are more likely to voice their opinion and less likely to deviate from their personal opinions. This shows that group membership can affect online polarization.
- 27 May 2023
- Published by SAGE Publications in New Media & Society
- Vol. 27 (1) , 225-245
Open AccessThe influence of group membership on online expressions and polarization on a discussion platform: An experimental study
Despite much attention for group polarization in online environments, little is known about how group membership affects online behavior. We designed an online platform where ethnic minority and majority users in the Netherlands participated in discussions about controversial topics (homosexuality and abortion). Participants were randomly assigned to either progressive, conservative, or mixed discussions on these topics, which were ostensibly held among ethnic minority or majority users. We find that when ethnic minority users are exposed to discussions among the ethnic majority (i.e., outgroup) with which they disagree, they are less likely to express their opinions and more likely to deviate from their personal opinions. Among ethnic majority users, we find the opposite: when confronted with a discussion among the ethnic minority with which they disagree, they are more likely to voice their opinion and less likely to deviate from their personal opinions. This shows that group membership can affect online polarization.
- Open Access
- 13 April 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science Research
- Vol. 106, 102726
The motherhood wage gap and trade-offs between family and work: A test of compensating wage differentials
- 13 April 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science Research
- Vol. 106, 102726
Open AccessThe motherhood wage gap and trade-offs between family and work: A test of compensating wage differentials