Karolin Toompere
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Karolin Toompere has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Aet Elken
North Estonia Medical Centre Cardiology Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
1 shared publicationAlar Irs
Heart Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
1 shared publicationAnneli Uusküla
Affiliation Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
1 shared publication- Ave Voit
University of Tartu Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Tartu, Estonia
1 shared publication Elin Org
University of Tartu Institute of Genomics, Tartu, Estonia
1 shared publication- Ene-Ly Jõgeda
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 July 2026
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 21 (7) , e0353184
Identification of risk profiles among persons attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Estonia
Background: While generalized STI prevention guidelines exist, individuals present with diverse interconnecting risk behaviors and needs. This cross-sectional study used latent class analysis to identify distinct behavioural profiles among men and women undergoing STI testing and to examine their potential implications for STI prevention. Methods: Data was collected by questionnaire from 1171 individuals seeking STI testing at the North Estonia Medical Centre between August 2022 and October 2023. Latent class analysis was applied to identify subgroups based on eight relevant STI risk variables. Separate models were fitted to men and women. Results: We propose three latent classes for both sexes. Among men, three classes were identified: “multiple partners; elevated behavioural risk” (62.4%); “predominantly monogamous; fewer behavioural risk indicators” (21.9%); and, “multiple partners; previous STI history; concentrated co-occurring risk” (15.7%). Women were categorised as follows: “new sexual partners; inconsistent condom use” (41.6%); “multiple partners; previous STI history; concentrated behavioural risk” (30.2%); and, “predominantly monogamous; possible partner-related exposure” (28.2%). The identified profiles demonstrated heterogeneity in sexual behaviour, condom use, prior STI history, and substance use across STI clinic attendees. Conclusions: The identified behavioural profiles highlight how co-occurring risk factors cluster within STI clinic populations and may help contextualise prevention discussions alongside individualized clinical assessment. These findings may support prevention discussions addressing partner communication, condom use, substance use, IPV awareness, and partner notification.
- 13 July 2026
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 21 (7) , e0353184
Open AccessIdentification of risk profiles among persons attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Estonia
Background: While generalized STI prevention guidelines exist, individuals present with diverse interconnecting risk behaviors and needs. This cross-sectional study used latent class analysis to identify distinct behavioural profiles among men and women undergoing STI testing and to examine their potential implications for STI prevention. Methods: Data was collected by questionnaire from 1171 individuals seeking STI testing at the North Estonia Medical Centre between August 2022 and October 2023. Latent class analysis was applied to identify subgroups based on eight relevant STI risk variables. Separate models were fitted to men and women. Results: We propose three latent classes for both sexes. Among men, three classes were identified: “multiple partners; elevated behavioural risk” (62.4%); “predominantly monogamous; fewer behavioural risk indicators” (21.9%); and, “multiple partners; previous STI history; concentrated co-occurring risk” (15.7%). Women were categorised as follows: “new sexual partners; inconsistent condom use” (41.6%); “multiple partners; previous STI history; concentrated behavioural risk” (30.2%); and, “predominantly monogamous; possible partner-related exposure” (28.2%). The identified profiles demonstrated heterogeneity in sexual behaviour, condom use, prior STI history, and substance use across STI clinic attendees. Conclusions: The identified behavioural profiles highlight how co-occurring risk factors cluster within STI clinic populations and may help contextualise prevention discussions alongside individualized clinical assessment. These findings may support prevention discussions addressing partner communication, condom use, substance use, IPV awareness, and partner notification.
- Open Access
Pragmatic trial assessing polygenic risk driven statin therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention: study protocol for the EE-PRS trial
Introduction: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be a leading cause of preventable death globally. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a way to detect individuals at higher relative risk of developing ASCVD, but they have not yet been incorporated into routine clinical practice. Pragmatic trials offer a way to evaluate the integration of PRS into cardiovascular disease prevention in primary care, allowing for a more accurate assessment of their effectiveness in everyday clinical practice. Methods and analysis: This trial evaluates the effectiveness of preventive statin treatment on reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events and death over 5 years in women (aged 55–80) and men (aged 45–80) with a high coronary artery disease PRS. This is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, randomised clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio to intervention (n=1350), receiving preventive rosuvastatin 20 mg treatment or control (n=1350), receiving current standard of care. Following the intention-to-treat principle, all randomised participants are analysed according to their allocated group, with the primary outcome defined as time to first major adverse cardiovascular event, comprising ischaemic heart disease, stroke or transient ischaemia, peripheral vascular occlusion and stenosis, revascularisation or cardiovascular death. Ethics and dissemination: This trial has received ethical approval from the Estonian Committee on Bioethics and Human Research (13.06.2024 nr 1.1-12/1531) and the Estonian Ethics Committee for Medicinal Products (19.12.2024 nr RKU-4/92). Trial registration number: NCT06820086 .
Open AccessPragmatic trial assessing polygenic risk driven statin therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention: study protocol for the EE-PRS trial
Introduction: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be a leading cause of preventable death globally. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a way to detect individuals at higher relative risk of developing ASCVD, but they have not yet been incorporated into routine clinical practice. Pragmatic trials offer a way to evaluate the integration of PRS into cardiovascular disease prevention in primary care, allowing for a more accurate assessment of their effectiveness in everyday clinical practice. Methods and analysis: This trial evaluates the effectiveness of preventive statin treatment on reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events and death over 5 years in women (aged 55–80) and men (aged 45–80) with a high coronary artery disease PRS. This is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, randomised clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio to intervention (n=1350), receiving preventive rosuvastatin 20 mg treatment or control (n=1350), receiving current standard of care. Following the intention-to-treat principle, all randomised participants are analysed according to their allocated group, with the primary outcome defined as time to first major adverse cardiovascular event, comprising ischaemic heart disease, stroke or transient ischaemia, peripheral vascular occlusion and stenosis, revascularisation or cardiovascular death. Ethics and dissemination: This trial has received ethical approval from the Estonian Committee on Bioethics and Human Research (13.06.2024 nr 1.1-12/1531) and the Estonian Ethics Committee for Medicinal Products (19.12.2024 nr RKU-4/92). Trial registration number: NCT06820086 .
- 2 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 94 (6) , 2632-2639
Norovirus strains among children aged 0–18 years hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in Estonia 2015–2016
Norovirus (NoV) is the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in many countries that have introduced universal rotavirus mass vaccination. This is the first study to report data on NoV strains in Estonia. We recruited 2249 children aged 0–18 years hospitalized for AGE in Estonian hospitals from February 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016. Norovirus gastroenteritis (NoVGE) was diagnosed in 14.5% (n = 325) cases. Stool sample for RNA extraction and genotyping was available in 86% (n = 280) of NoVGE cases (2015, n = 91; 2016, n = 189). Dominant capsid types detected in 75% (n = 210) samples were, GII.4 (63.8%, n = 134), GII.3 (15.2%, n = 32), GII.17 (6.7%, n = 14), and GII.6 (5.2%, n = 11). Prevailing RNA polymerase types found in 77% (n = 215) samples were GII.P31 (51.1%, n = 110), GII.P21 (17.7%, n = 38), GII.P4 (11.2%, n = 24), and GII.P7 (6.5%, n = 14). Both regions were typeable for 67% (n = 189) of samples. Most prevalent strains were GII.4Sydney_2012[P31] (48.7%, n = 92), GII.3[P21] (15.3%, n = 29), GII.4Sydney_2012[P4] (5.8%, n = 11) and GII.17[P17] (5.8%, n = 11). Simpson's diversity index showed a significant difference between the age groups 1–4 and 5–9 years: D 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.73) versus 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81–0.86), respectively (p = 0.03). An accurate understanding of NoV strain diversity is important for control and preventive measures, especially in the postrotavirus vaccine era.
- 2 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 94 (6) , 2632-2639
Norovirus strains among children aged 0–18 years hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in Estonia 2015–2016
Norovirus (NoV) is the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in many countries that have introduced universal rotavirus mass vaccination. This is the first study to report data on NoV strains in Estonia. We recruited 2249 children aged 0–18 years hospitalized for AGE in Estonian hospitals from February 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016. Norovirus gastroenteritis (NoVGE) was diagnosed in 14.5% (n = 325) cases. Stool sample for RNA extraction and genotyping was available in 86% (n = 280) of NoVGE cases (2015, n = 91; 2016, n = 189). Dominant capsid types detected in 75% (n = 210) samples were, GII.4 (63.8%, n = 134), GII.3 (15.2%, n = 32), GII.17 (6.7%, n = 14), and GII.6 (5.2%, n = 11). Prevailing RNA polymerase types found in 77% (n = 215) samples were GII.P31 (51.1%, n = 110), GII.P21 (17.7%, n = 38), GII.P4 (11.2%, n = 24), and GII.P7 (6.5%, n = 14). Both regions were typeable for 67% (n = 189) of samples. Most prevalent strains were GII.4Sydney_2012[P31] (48.7%, n = 92), GII.3[P21] (15.3%, n = 29), GII.4Sydney_2012[P4] (5.8%, n = 11) and GII.17[P17] (5.8%, n = 11). Simpson's diversity index showed a significant difference between the age groups 1–4 and 5–9 years: D 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.73) versus 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81–0.86), respectively (p = 0.03). An accurate understanding of NoV strain diversity is important for control and preventive measures, especially in the postrotavirus vaccine era.