Sara Jane Ward

This study demonstrates the utility of a rat model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) to assess the ability of the non-psychoactive cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) to modulate the development of this syndrome in vivo. The method utilizes the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel to generate an allodynic phenotype in the animals. This study describes how to handle and solubilize CBD, administer the chemotherapeutic agent, assess mechanical and cold sensitivity, and apply high-speed videography to measure nocifensive behavior in animals. Using the procedures outlined, the data support that CBD prevents the allodynic phenotype from developing in the treated animals. No difference was observed in the CBD-treated animals from day 0 (pre-paclitaxel baseline) to day 7 (post-sensitization) in mechanical or thermal sensitivity, while the vehicle-treated animals became significantly more sensitive. This response to treatment is durable up to the latest time point where data were collected (7 weeks). The addition of high-speed videography allows for a more granular and unbiased assessment of this behavioral phenotype (e.g., classification of analgesia and anti-allodynia). This demonstrates both the utility of this model for cannabinoid drug characterization and the potential role of CBD in mitigating neuropathic pain.

This study demonstrates the utility of a rat model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) to assess the ability of the non-psychoactive cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) to modulate the development of this syndrome in vivo. The method utilizes the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel to generate an allodynic phenotype in the animals. This study describes how to handle and solubilize CBD, administer the chemotherapeutic agent, assess mechanical and cold sensitivity, and apply high-speed videography to measure nocifensive behavior in animals. Using the procedures outlined, the data support that CBD prevents the allodynic phenotype from developing in the treated animals. No difference was observed in the CBD-treated animals from day 0 (pre-paclitaxel baseline) to day 7 (post-sensitization) in mechanical or thermal sensitivity, while the vehicle-treated animals became significantly more sensitive. This response to treatment is durable up to the latest time point where data were collected (7 weeks). The addition of high-speed videography allows for a more granular and unbiased assessment of this behavioral phenotype (e.g., classification of analgesia and anti-allodynia). This demonstrates both the utility of this model for cannabinoid drug characterization and the potential role of CBD in mitigating neuropathic pain.

In recent years, there has been increased accessibility to cannabis for recreational and medicinal use. Incidentally, there has been an increase in reports describing allergic reactions to cannabis including exacerbation of underlying asthma. Recently, multiple protein allergens were discovered in cannabis, yet these fail to explain allergic sensitization in many patients, particularly urticaria and angioedema. Cannabis has a rich chemical profile including cannabinoids and terpenes that possess immunomodulatory potential. We examined whether major cannabinoids of cannabis such as cannabidiol (CBD) and the bicyclic sesquiterpene beta-caryophyllene (β-CP) act as contact sensitizers. The repeated topical application of mice skin with β-CP at 10 mg/mL (50 µL) induced an itch response and dermatitis at 2 weeks in mice, which were sustained for the period of study. Histopathological analysis of skin tissues revealed significant edema and desquamation for β-CP at 10 mg/mL. For CBD and β-CP, we observed a dose-dependent increase in epidermal thickening with profound thickening observed for β-CP at 10 mg/mL. Significant trafficking of CD11b cells was observed in various compartments of the skin in response to treatment with β-CP in a concentration-dependent manner. Mast cell trafficking was restricted to β-CP (10 mg/mL). Mouse proteome profiler cytokine/chemokine array revealed upregulation of complement C5/5a (anaphylatoxin), soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) in animals dosed with β-CP (10 mg/mL). Moreover, we observed a dose-dependent increase in serum IgE in animals dosed with β-CP. Treatment with β-CP (10 mg/mL) significantly reduced filaggrin expression, an indicator of barrier disruption. In contrast, treatment with CBD at all concentrations failed to evoke scratching and dermatitis in mice and did not result in increased serum IgE. Further, skin tissues were devoid of any remarkable features, although at 10 mg/mL CBD we did observe the accumulation of dermal CD11b cells in skin tissue sections. We also observed increased filaggrin staining in mice repeatedly dosed with CBD (10 mg/mL). Collectively, our studies indicate that repeated exposure to high concentrations of β-CP can induce dermatitis-like pathological outcomes in mice.

Acutely, non-selective cannabinoid (CB) agonists have been shown to increase morphine antinociceptive effects, and we and others have also demonstrated that non-selective CB agonists attenuate morphine antinociceptive tolerance. Activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors reverses allodynia and hyperalgesia in models of chronic pain, and co-administration of morphine with CB2 receptor selective agonists has been shown to be synergistic. CB2 receptor activation has also been shown to reduce morphine-induced hyperalgesia in rodents, an effect attributed to CB2 receptor modulation of inflammation. In the present set of experiments, we tested both the acute and chronic interactions between morphine and the CB2 receptor selective agonist O-1966 treatments on antinociception and antinociceptive tolerance in C57Bl6 mice. Co-administration of morphine and O-1966 was tested under three dosing regimens: simultaneous administration, morphine pre-treated with O-1966, and O-1966 pre-treated with morphine. The effects of O-1966 on mu-opioid receptor binding were determined using [3H]DAMGO and [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assays, and these interactions were further examined by FRET analysis linked to flow cytometry. Results yielded surprising evidence of interactions between the CB2 receptor selective agonist O-1966 and morphine that were dependent upon the order of administration. When O-1966 was administered prior to or simultaneous with morphine, morphine antinociception was attenuated and antinociceptive tolerance was exacerbated. When O-1966 was administered following morphine, morphine antinociception was not affected and antinociceptive tolerance was attenuated. The [³⁵S]GTPγS results suggest that O-1966 interrupts functional activity of morphine at the mu-opioid receptor, leading to decreased potency of morphine to produce acute thermal antinociceptive effects and potentiation of morphine antinociceptive tolerance. However, O-1966 administered after morphine blocked morphine hyperalgesia and led to an attenuation of morphine tolerance, perhaps due to well-documented anti-inflammatory effects of CB2 receptor agonism.