Tomoyoshi Sakaguchi

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Purpose: To determine whether preoperative trunk and lower limb muscle quality predicts achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) after lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery.Overview of Literature: LSS commonly causes intermittent claudication and reduced walking ability. Previous studies have suggested that muscle quality affects postoperative recovery, but its association with clinically meaningful improvements in the 6MWD remains unclear.Methods: This retrospective study included 150 patients aged ≥60 years who underwent decompression or fusion surgery for LSS at Okayama Rosai Hospital between April 2021 and April 2023. Preoperative assessments included demographic and surgical factors, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) scores, visual analog scale scores, the 6MWD, and computed tomography-based muscle quality. The functional cross-sectional areas of the psoas major, erector spinae (ES), multifidus, gluteus maximus, and gluteus medius were quantified in Hounsfield units. Muscle quality was expressed as the low-attenuation muscle area (LAMA) ratio. Patients were classified according to whether they achieved the MCID (80 m) in the postoperative 6MWD. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of the achievement of the MCID.Results: Among the 150 patients, 86 (57%) achieved the MCID. Univariate analysis showed that younger age, higher preoperative ZCQ scores, a shorter 6MWD, and lower LAMA ratios of all examined muscles were significantly associated with the achievement of the MCID in postoperative walking ability. In multivariate analysis, younger age (p <0.001), a shorter preoperative 6MWD (p =0.016), and a lower ES LAMA ratio (p <0.001) remained independent predictors. These results indicate that better preoperative ES muscle quality independently contributes to postoperative walking recovery in patients with LSS.Conclusions: Preoperative younger age, shorter 6MWD, and lower ES LAMA ratio independently predicted meaningful postoperative improvement in walking. Enhancing preoperative ES muscle quality is crucial for postoperative walking recovery in patients with LSS.

Study Design: Scoping review.Purpose: To map and summarize current evidence on acute-phase rehabilitation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs), with particular emphasis on intervention characteristics, safety, and clinical effectiveness.Overview of Literature: Existing reviews on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures have predominantly focused on pharmacological or bracing strategies, whereas evidence regarding rehabilitation in the acute phase remains limited.Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database to identify studies published between January 2015 and December 2025. Eligible studies included patients with vertebral compression fractures or OVFs who underwent rehabilitation or exercise-based interventions within 4 weeks of symptom onset. Extracted data were narratively synthesized.Results: This review identified 1,034 records and included seven studies. The included studies were heterogeneous in design and enrolled between 34 and 40,743 participants. In most studies, rehabilitation was initiated within 2 weeks of onset, with several studies reporting initiation within 3 days of admission. Early initiation of rehabilitation within 3 days was associated with greater improvements in the Barthel index (BI) (p <0.001). Longer daily rehabilitation duration was associated with BI gains of 7.28–10.24 points. Provision of rehabilitation through the week, including weekends, was linked to higher BI scores at discharge (B =3.92, p <0.001) and reduced readmission rates (odds ratio, 0.907; p =0.008). No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Acute-phase rehabilitation for patients with OVF appears to be safe and may contribute to improved functional recovery and favorable clinical outcomes, particularly when initiated within 2 weeks of onset and preferably within the first 3 days. Further prospective studies are warranted to establish the optimal rehabilitation program during the acute phase.

Prospective cohort study. To assess the responsiveness of the Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief B... Asian Spine Journal 2026;():-.

Retrospective cohort study. To identify factors predictive of a postoperative gain in thoracic kyphosis (TK)... Asian Spine Journal 2026;():-.

Background: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has become an invaluable tool for spinal deformity surgery. This study aims to present our experience of using transcranial motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) as an IONM tool in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing navigation-assisted deformity correction and explore the potential risk factors associated with false-positive and true-positive IONM findings. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 103 patients (mean age 16.2 ± 4.0 years) undergoing corrective surgery for spinal deformity. All pediatric spinal deformity correction surgeries at the center were performed by a single senior spine surgeon, utilizing navigation and Tc-MEP to enhance the neurological safety profile. The sensitivity and the specificity of Tc-MEP were calculated. Results: Of the total cases, 87 patients (84.5%) exhibited no IONM signal alert and did not experience any postoperative neurological deficits, representing true negatives. There were no false-negative cases, which gives a negative predictive value of 100%. Significant IONM signal alerts were observed in 16 patients (15.5%), but only two patients (1.9%) experienced a postoperative motor deficit, representing true positives, which yielded a positive predictive value of 12.5%. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of Tc-MEP to be 100% and 86.3%, respectively, with a false-positive rate of 13.7%. Blood loss was the only factor significantly associated with IONM alerts, while age, gender, surgical duration, and anesthetic modality showed no significant differences.

Study Design: Prospective observational study. Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) impairs balance and gait function, increasing fall risk and limiting quality of life. Although postoperative recovery of balance is clinically important, longitudinal data using multidimensional balance assessments are limited. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 101 patients (mean age 74.9 ± 6.9 years) undergoing surgery for LSS. The Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief BESTest), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain/numbness were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Changes over time and correlations between Brief BESTest and PROMs were analyzed. Results: The total Brief BESTest score significantly improved from 13.3 ± 5.3 preoperatively to 16.1 ± 5.1 at 6 months and 16.0 ± 5.1 at 12 months (p < 0.01). Subdomains including Anticipatory Adjustments, Postural Responses, Sensory Orientation, and Stability in Gait improved significantly, while Stability Limits did not. At 12 months postoperatively, ODI decreased by 19.1%, ZCQ symptom and function scores improved by 0.8 and 0.9 points, respectively, and VAS scores improved by 17.1 mm for low back pain, 26.5 mm for lower limb pain, and 19.5 mm for numbness, all showing marked improvements from baseline. MFES also increased significantly postoperatively. The Brief BESTest score correlated significantly with MFES and ZCQ-PFS at baseline, and with ODI, ZCQ, and VAS scores at 12 months. Conclusions: Balance ability in LSS patients improved after surgery, as measured by the Brief BESTest, with clinically meaningful changes maintained for 12 months. Improvements in balance were significantly associated with reductions in pain, disability, and fear of falling, suggesting the Brief BESTest is a comprehensive indicator of postoperative recovery.

Background and Objectives: We conducted a retrospective observational study. Background: While traditional rehabilitation approaches emphasize trunk muscle conditioning, emerging evidence suggests that leg muscle strength plays a critical role in postoperative functional mobility. Previous studies have focused on trunk muscle rehabilitation in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, recent findings suggest that leg muscle conditioning may be a better predictor of postoperative improvement. Strengthening the gluteal and iliopsoas muscles has been linked to improved sagittal balance, gait stability, and mobility, ultimately leading to enhanced surgical outcomes. This study examines the relationship between the preoperative functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) of trunk and leg muscles and postoperative improvement in mobility, as assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, in patients undergoing surgery for ASD. Materials and Methods: Sixty-two patients (57 women, mean age 71.2 ± 7.1 years) who underwent ASD surgery between April 2017 and April 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The FCSA of key muscles—psoas major (PM), erector spinae (ES), multifidus (MF), gluteus maximus (GM), and gluteus medius (GMed)—was measured using CT images. Patients were categorized into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on whether they achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of −2 s in the TUG test 12 months after surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to adjust for baseline differences between the groups. A significance level of 5% was used for all comparisons. Results: Thirty-three patients achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in TUG, while 29 did not. Before PSM, patients with worse preoperative TUG and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores showed greater improvements (p < 0.01). After PSM, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age, sex, or BMI. However, the improvement group showed significantly greater FCSA values in PM (6.1 ± 2.3 mm² vs. 3.9 ± 1.5 mm², p = 0.021) and GM (19.9 ± 5.9 mm² vs. 15.3 ± 3.9 mm², p = 0.019). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that leg muscle quality, particularly that of the gluteus maximus and psoas major, is a significant predictor of postoperative mobility improvement in patients with ASD. These findings challenge the conventional focus on trunk muscles and suggest the inclusion of leg muscle training in preoperative rehabilitation strategies to enhance surgical outcomes.

Purpose: The increasing elderly patient population is contributing to the rising worldwide load of cervical spinal disorders, which is expected to result in a global increase in the number of surgical procedures in the foreseeable future. Cervical rehabilitation plays a crucial role in optimal recovery after cervical spine surgeries. Nevertheless, there is no agreement in the existing research regarding the most suitable postsurgical rehabilitation program. Consequently, this review assesses the ideal rehabilitation approach for adult patients following cervical spine operations. Materials and Methods: This review covers activities of daily living and encompasses diverse treatment methods, including physiotherapy, specialized tools, and guidance for everyday activities. The review is organized under three headings: (1) historical perspectives, (2) patient-reported functional outcomes, and (3) general and disease-specific rehabilitation. Results: Rehabilitation programs are determined on the basis of patient-reported outcomes, performance tests, and disease prognosis. CSM requires strengthening of the neck and shoulder muscles that have been surgically invaded. In contrast, the CCI requires mobility according to the severity of the spinal cord injury and functional prognosis. The goal of rehabilitation for CCTs, as for CCIs, is to achieve ambulation, but the prognosis and impact of cancer treatment must be considered. Conclusions: Rehabilitation of the cervical spine after surgery is essential for improving physical function and the ability to perform daily activities and enhancing overall quality of life. The rehabilitation process should encompass general as well as disease-specific exercises. While current rehabilitation protocols heavily focus on strengthening muscles, they often neglect the crucial aspect of spinal balance. Therefore, giving equal attention to muscle reinforcement and the enhancement of spinal balance following surgery on the cervical spine is vital.

Purpose: With an increase in the proportion of elderly patients, the global burden of spinal disease is on the rise. This is gradually expected to increase the number of surgical procedures all over the world in the near future. As we know, rehabilitation following spine surgery is critical for optimal recovery. However, the current literature lacks consensus regarding the appropriate post-operative rehabilitation protocol. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the optimal protocol for rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults. Materials and Methods: The goals of rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery are to improve physical and psychosocial function and may include multiple modalities such as physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, specialized instruments, and instructions to be followed during activities of daily living. In recent years, not only are a greater number of spine surgeries being performed, but various different techniques of lumbar spine surgery and spinal fusion have also emerged. (1) Our review summarizes post-operative rehabilitation under the following headings—1. Historical aspects, 2. Subjective functional outcomes, and (3) Actual rehabilitation measures, including balance. Results: Physical therapy programs need to be patient-specific and surgery-specific, such that they consider patient-reported outcome measures and take into consideration the technique of spinal fusion used and the muscle groups involved in these surgeries. By doing so, it is possible to assess the level of functional impairment and then specifically target the strengthening of those muscle groups affected by surgery whilst also improving impaired balance and allowing a return to daily activities. Conclusions: Rehabilitation is a multi-faceted journey to restore mobility, function, and quality of life. The current rehabilitation practice focuses on muscle strengthening, but the importance of spinal balance is less elaborated. We thus equally emphasize muscle strengthening and balance improvement post-lumbar spine surgery.

With an increase in proportion of elderly patients, the global burden of spinal disease is on the rise. Likewise, there has been an increasing trend in the number of spine surgeries being performed worldwide. As we know, rehabilitation following spine surgery is critical for optimal recovery. However, current literature lacks consensus regarding the appropriate post operative rehabilitation protocol. The goals of rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery are to improve physical and psychosocial function and may include multiple modalities such as physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, specialized instruments, and instruction to be followed during activities of daily living. In recent years, not only are a greater number of spine surgeries being performed, various different techniques of lumbar spine surgery and spinal fusion have emerged. Physical therapy programs need to be curated after assessing the functional status of the patient by using various patient reported outcome measures and taking into consideration the technique of spinal fusion used and the muscle groups involved in these surgeries. By doing so it is possible to assess the level of functional impairment and then specifically target strengthening of those muscle groups affected by surgery whilst also improving impaired balance and allowing return to activities of daily living. We reviewed available literature pertaining to the history of spinal rehabilitation, the popular patient reported outcome measures used and different rehabilitation methods with the purpose of summarizing the current guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation after spine surgery and to introduce the rehabilitation after lumbar surgeries that we provide at our hospital.