Yahia Osman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Yahia Osman has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Isameldin Abakar Atiem
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nyala, Nyala 63311, Sudan
2 shared publications - Magdi S. A. Siddig
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2 shared publications - Mazahir M. M. Taha
Civil Engineering Department, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum 1432, Sudan
2 shared publications - Salma Ibrahim
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2 shared publications - Shindume Lomboleni Hamukwaya
University of Namibia
2 shared publications - Abdelmula Abdalla
Ministry of Transport and Logistic Services (MOTLS), Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 12 (7) , 1069
Assessment of Seasonal Rainfall Drought Indices, Nyala City Sudan
Drought is an unpredictable hydrological phenomenon, and climate change has made it difficult to predict and analyze droughts. Nyala city airport metrological station rainfall records from 1943 to 2017 (75 years) were investigated. Four statistical drought indices were used; the standardized precipitation index (SPI), the rainfall anomaly index (RAI), the rainfall decile percent index (RDI), and the percent normal precipitation index (PNI). The study analyzes, assesses, compares, and determines the proper drought index. Results show that annual normal drought class (DC4) percentages for PNI, RDI, and RAI are not significantly different at an average of 42% and 65.3% for SPI at a frequency of 49 years. In comparing the average monthly and yearly drought frequency values and considering the historical dry and wet droughts, results showed the indices performance rank as: SPI, RAI, RDI, and PNI. Result reveals that the SPI was superior in all analyses, but it had some defects in detecting monthly dry drought when precipitation is dominated by rare or zero values (start and end of the rainy season). This was concluded and revealed by conducting a zone chart showing the deviations of standard deviation about the mean. Thus, the SPI index outperforms the other three indices.
- 21 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 12 (7) , 1069
Open AccessAssessment of Seasonal Rainfall Drought Indices, Nyala City Sudan
Drought is an unpredictable hydrological phenomenon, and climate change has made it difficult to predict and analyze droughts. Nyala city airport metrological station rainfall records from 1943 to 2017 (75 years) were investigated. Four statistical drought indices were used; the standardized precipitation index (SPI), the rainfall anomaly index (RAI), the rainfall decile percent index (RDI), and the percent normal precipitation index (PNI). The study analyzes, assesses, compares, and determines the proper drought index. Results show that annual normal drought class (DC4) percentages for PNI, RDI, and RAI are not significantly different at an average of 42% and 65.3% for SPI at a frequency of 49 years. In comparing the average monthly and yearly drought frequency values and considering the historical dry and wet droughts, results showed the indices performance rank as: SPI, RAI, RDI, and PNI. Result reveals that the SPI was superior in all analyses, but it had some defects in detecting monthly dry drought when precipitation is dominated by rare or zero values (start and end of the rainy season). This was concluded and revealed by conducting a zone chart showing the deviations of standard deviation about the mean. Thus, the SPI index outperforms the other three indices.
- Open Access
Bias Adjustment of Four Satellite-Based Rainfall Products Using Ground-Based Measurements over Sudan
Satellite-based rainfall estimates (SREs) represent a promising alternative dataset for climate and hydrological studies, where gauge observations are insufficient. However, these datasets are accompanied by significant uncertainties. Therefore, this study aims to minimize the systematic bias of Artificial Neural Networks–Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS), Artificial Neural Networks-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR), Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), and Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) rainfall estimates using a quantile mapping (QM) method with climatic zones (CZs). The adjusted rainfall estimates were evaluated for the period from 2003–2017; data from 2003 to 2016 were used for calibration, and data from 2017 were used for validation. The results revealed significant improvements for the adjusted PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-CDR, CHIRPS, and GPCP monthly time series in terms of all statistical measures and evaluation of overall CZs. In terms of Root Mean Square Errors (RMSEs), the adjusted CHIRPS did not show an improvement. This method successfully removed the mean bias of the daily time series for all SREs. The findings suggest that this method can be applied to correct the systematic bias of all SREs in the monthly time series in the future without the need for further gauge measurements over Sudan.
Open AccessBias Adjustment of Four Satellite-Based Rainfall Products Using Ground-Based Measurements over Sudan
Satellite-based rainfall estimates (SREs) represent a promising alternative dataset for climate and hydrological studies, where gauge observations are insufficient. However, these datasets are accompanied by significant uncertainties. Therefore, this study aims to minimize the systematic bias of Artificial Neural Networks–Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS), Artificial Neural Networks-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR), Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), and Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) rainfall estimates using a quantile mapping (QM) method with climatic zones (CZs). The adjusted rainfall estimates were evaluated for the period from 2003–2017; data from 2003 to 2016 were used for calibration, and data from 2017 were used for validation. The results revealed significant improvements for the adjusted PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-CDR, CHIRPS, and GPCP monthly time series in terms of all statistical measures and evaluation of overall CZs. In terms of Root Mean Square Errors (RMSEs), the adjusted CHIRPS did not show an improvement. This method successfully removed the mean bias of the daily time series for all SREs. The findings suggest that this method can be applied to correct the systematic bias of all SREs in the monthly time series in the future without the need for further gauge measurements over Sudan.