Benedetta Bollato
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Benedetta Bollato has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alberto De Stefani
Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
1 shared publication - Antonio Gracco
Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35122 Padova, Italy
1 shared publication - Giorgia Crivellin
Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy
1 shared publication - Giovanni Bruno
Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy
1 shared publication - Martina Barone
Department of Neurosciences, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
1 shared publication - Ugo Baciliero
Maxillofacial Surgery Complex Unit of San Bortolo Hospital of Vicenza, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 May 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (9) , 2675
The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Compared to Non-Syndromic Skeletal Class III Patients
Background: The present study aims to compare the accuracy of jaw repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using digital surgical planning in cleft lip and palate patients and in non-syndromic skeletal class III patients in order to investigate if orthognathic surgery achieves different results in the first group of patients. Method: This study included 32 class III adult patients divided into 2 groups: cleft lip and palate (A, n = 16) and non-cleft (B, n = 16). For each patient, a 2D pre-surgical visual treatment objective was performed by the surgeon to predict hard tissue changes, and the surgical outcome was compared with that planned by using cephalometric measurement (ANB, SNA, SNB, Ar-Go-Me, S-Ar-Go). The statistical analysis showed equivalence between obtained and planned results for each measurement both in group A and in group B, but the difference between the planned and the obtained result was smaller in group B regarding ANB angle. Conclusions: Digital surgical planning ensures better predictability of the surgical results and higher accuracy of surgery in complex patients, such as those with cleft lip and palate.
- 9 May 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (9) , 2675
Open AccessThe Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Compared to Non-Syndromic Skeletal Class III Patients
Background: The present study aims to compare the accuracy of jaw repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using digital surgical planning in cleft lip and palate patients and in non-syndromic skeletal class III patients in order to investigate if orthognathic surgery achieves different results in the first group of patients. Method: This study included 32 class III adult patients divided into 2 groups: cleft lip and palate (A, n = 16) and non-cleft (B, n = 16). For each patient, a 2D pre-surgical visual treatment objective was performed by the surgeon to predict hard tissue changes, and the surgical outcome was compared with that planned by using cephalometric measurement (ANB, SNA, SNB, Ar-Go-Me, S-Ar-Go). The statistical analysis showed equivalence between obtained and planned results for each measurement both in group A and in group B, but the difference between the planned and the obtained result was smaller in group B regarding ANB angle. Conclusions: Digital surgical planning ensures better predictability of the surgical results and higher accuracy of surgery in complex patients, such as those with cleft lip and palate.