Robert Ondrak

The present study focused on the Upper Cretaceous to Middle Miocene sequence in the Central Gulf of Suez, Egypt. The Upper Cretaceous to Middle Miocene sequence in the October field is thick and deeply buried, consisting mainly of brown limestone, chalk limestone, and reefal limestone intercalated with clastic shale. This study integrated various datasets, including total organic carbon (TOC), Rock-Eval pyrolysis, visual kerogen examination, vitrinite reflectance (%Ro), and bottom-hole temperature measurements. The main objective of this study is to delineate the source rock characteristics of these strata regarding organic richness, thermal maturity, kerogen type, timing of hydrocarbon transformation and generation. The Upper Cretaceous Brown Limestone Formation is represented by 135 samples from four wells and is considered to be a fair to excellent source rock, primarily containing type I and II kerogen. It is immature to early mature, generating oil with a low to intermediate level of hydrocarbon conversion. The Eocene Thebes Formation is represented by 105 samples from six wells and is considered to be a good to fair oil source rock with some potential for gas, primarily containing type II and II/III kerogen. Most samples are immature with a low level of hydrocarbon conversion while few are mature having an intermediate degree of hydrocarbon conversion. The Middle Miocene Lower Rudeis Formation is represented by 8 samples from two wells and considered to be a fair but immature source rock, primarily containing type III kerogen with a low level of conversion representing a potential source for gas. The Middle Miocene Belayim Formation is represented by 29 samples from three wells and is considered to be a poor to good source rock, primarily containing kerogen type II and III. Most samples are immature with a low level of hydrocarbon conversion while few are mature having an intermediate degree of hydrocarbon conversion. 1D basin model A-5 well shows that the Upper Cretaceous Brown Limestone source rock entered the early oil window at 39 Ma, progressed to the main oil window by 13 Ma, and remains in this stage today. The Eocene Thebes source rock began generating hydrocarbons at 21.3 Ma, advanced to the main oil window at 11 Ma, and has been in the late oil window since 1.6 Ma. The Middle Miocene Lower Rudeis source rock entered the early oil window at 12.6 Ma, transitioned to the main oil window at 5.7 Ma, where it remains active. In contrast, the Middle Miocene Belayim source rock has not yet reached the early oil window and remains immature, with values ranging from 0.00 to 0.55 % Ro. The transformation ratio plot shows that the Brown Limestone Formation began transforming into the Upper Cretaceous (73 Ma), reaching 29.84% by the Miocene (14.3 Ma). The Thebes Formation initiated transformation in the Late Eocene (52.3 Ma) and reached 6.42% by 16.4 Ma. The Lower Rudeis Formation began in the Middle Miocene (18.7 Ma), reaching 3.59% by 9.2 Ma. The Belayim Formation started its transformation at 11.2 Ma, reaching 0.63% by 6.8 Ma.

The Cameros Basin (North Spain) is a Late Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous extensional basin, which was inverted during the Cenozoic. It underwent a remarkable thermal evolution, as indicated by the record of anomalous high temperatures in its deposits. In this study, the subsidence and thermal history of the basin is reconstructed, using subsidence analysis and 2D thermal modelling. Tectonic subsidence curves provide evidence of the occurrence of two rapid subsidence phases during the syn‐extensional stage. In the first phase (Tithonian‐Early Berriasian), the largest accommodation space was formed in the central sector of the basin, whereas in the second (Early Barremian‐Early Albian), it was formed in the northern sector. These rapid subsidence phases could correspond to relevant tectonic events affecting the Iberian Plate at that time. By distinguishing between the initial and thermal subsidence and defining their relative magnitudes, Royden's (1986) method was used to estimate the heat flow at the end of the extensional stage. A maximum heat flow of 60–65 mW/m² is estimated, implying only a minor thermal disturbance associated with extension. In contrast with these data, very high vitrinite reflectance, anomalously distributed in some case with respect to the typical depth‐vitrinite reflectance relation, was measured in the central‐northern sector of the basin. Burial and thermal data are used to construct a 2D thermal basin model, to elucidate the role of the processes involved in sediment heating. Calibration of the thermal model with the vitrinite reflectance (%Ro) and fluid inclusion (FI) data indicates that in the central and northern sectors of the basin, an extra heat source, other than a typical rift, is required to explain the observed thermal anomalies. The distribution of the %Ro and FI values in these sectors suggests that the high temperatures and their distribution are related to the circulation of hot fluids. Hot fluids were attributed to the hydrothermal metamorphic events affecting the area during the early post‐extensional and inversion stages of the basin.