Petru Cioata

Decentralized databases have gained popularity in the last few years in different areas, such as: traceability, supply chains or finance. Leveraging this type of emerging technology will improve knowledge sharing, as well as the transparency and traceability of the data for digital systems. In a similar way, the characteristics are advertised by the centralized ledger technologies, which are manufactured by large cloud service providers such as Amazon. The present study analyzes the performance of two ledger technologies: BigchainDB (i.e., the decentralized blockchain database) and Amazon QLDB (i.e., the centralized ledger database with transparent and immutable characteristics). For the purposes of comparison, we have integrated these technologies into our traceability platform, which is called the Smart Tracking Platform (STP), and performed a series of experiments enabling us to acquire data for different metrics, such as CPU or memory usage for both the reading and writing operations. The findings of the present study show that QLDB has an overall better performance compared to BigchainDB, based on the metrics that have been considered. From the perspective of database ledger implementation, Amazon QLDB proved to be an integrated solution, easier to use, while BigchainDB comprises a more complex system to be implemented and developed, but is more flexible. Although both systems are almost ready to use solutions for local environments, when it comes to configuration and setting up the communication between nodes within a production environment, BigchainDB adds a layer of complexity from a DevOps perspective, while Amazon QLDB completely overcomes it. Depending on the area considered and the identified needs, both BigchainDB and Amazon QLDB can be considered as suitable solutions for a ledger database.

As the policies and regulations currently in place concentrate on environmental protection and greenhouse gas reduction, we are steadily witnessing a shift in the transportation industry towards electromobility. There are, though, several issues that need to be addressed to encourage the adoption of EVs on a larger scale, starting from enhancing the network interoperability and accessibility and removing the uncertainty associated with the availability of charging stations. Another issue is of particular interest for EV drivers travelling longer distances and is related to scheduling a recharging operation at the estimated time of arrival, without long queuing times. To this end, we propose a solution capable of addressing multiple EV charging scheduling issues, such as congestion management, scheduling a charging station in advance, and allowing EV drivers to plan optimized long trips using their EVs. The smart charging scheduling system we propose considers a variety of factors such as battery charge level, trip distance, nearby charging stations, other appointments, and average speed. Given the scarcity of data sets required to train the Reinforcement Learning algorithms, the novelty of the recommended solution lies in the scenario simulator, which generates the labelled datasets needed to train the algorithm. Based on the generated scenarios, we created and trained a neural network that uses a history of previous situations to identify the optimal charging station and time interval for recharging. The results are promising and for future work we are planning to train the DQN model using real-world data.

As the policies and regulations currently in place concentrate on environmental protection and greenhouse gas reduction, we are steadily witnessing a shift in the transportation industry towards electromobility. There are, though, several issues that need to be addressed to encourage the adoption of EVs at a larger scale. To this end, we propose a solution capable of addressing multiple EV charging scheduling issues, such as congestion management, scheduling a charging station in advance, and allowing EV drivers to plan optimized long trips using their EVs. The smart charging scheduling system we propose considers a variety of factors such as battery charge level, trip distance, nearby charging stations, other appointments, and average speed. Given the scarcity of data sets required to train the Reinforcement Learning algorithms, the novelty of the recommended solution lies in the scenario simulator, which generates the labelled datasets needed to train the algorithm. Based on the generated scenarios, we created and trained a neural network that uses a history of previous situations to identify the optimal charging station and time interval for recharging. The results are promising and for future work we are planning to train the DQN model using real-world data.