Juan Leoni

Introduction: The 2018 revision of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation system has shifted clinical practice toward increased use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) as a bridge to transplantation (BTT). However, comparative outcomes between temporary and durable MCS strategies remain incompletely defined, particularly from a strategy-level perspective. We aim to compare clinical and peri-transplant outcomes between temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support strategies in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between October 2018 and October 2020. Patients were categorized according to MCS strategy as temporary (Impella 5.5 or axillary intra-aortic balloon pump) or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Primary outcomes included device-to-transplant time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and post-transplant ICU length of stay (LOS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to evaluate outcomes and predictors. Results: A total of 26 patients were included, of whom 17 (65.4%) received tMCS and 9 (34.6%) durable LVAD support. Temporary MCS was associated with significantly shorter waitlist time (median 27.5–34 vs. 606 days, p = 0.002) and device-to-transplant time (7–13 vs. 572 days, p = 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly shorter time to transplantation with tMCS (log-rank χ² = 18.98, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, tMCS remained independently associated with shorter device-to-transplant time (B = −495.23; 95% CI −714.38 to −276.08; p = 0.001) and shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (B = −88.85; 95% CI −126.32 to −51.38; p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences in post-transplant ICU LOS or other early post-transplant outcomes were detected between groups. Conclusions: In this single-center cohort, temporary MCS was associated with significantly shorter time to transplantation and shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times compared with durable LVAD support, while no statistically significant differences in early post-transplant outcomes were detected between groups.

Background: We report a case to demonstrate that targeted eosinophil depletion with Benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor α therapy) can induce the complete functional and structural reversal of advanced EGPA-associated cardiomyopathy. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old woman with a decade-long history of EGPA presented with progressive nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and a nadir ejection fraction of 25–30%. Cardiac MRI demonstrated diffuse nonischemic late gadolinium enhancement consistent with eosinophil-mediated myocardial injury. Despite the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy, complete recovery was not achieved until benralizumab was initiated. Following biologic therapy, the ejection fraction recovered to 50% and severe mitral regurgitation regressed to mild. The exercise capacity was preserved throughout, with a peak VO₂ of 117% and 111% of predicted before and after biologic therapy, respectively. The patient remains in NYHA Class I at the one-year follow-up. Discussion: We describe a case with EGPA-associated non-ischemic cardiomyopathy treated with benralizumab achieving the complete recovery of ventricular function and achieving the complete independence of steroid therapy. Conclusions: This case emphasizes the importance of identifying the inflammatory etiology of cardiomyopathy, optimizing GDMT systematically, and considering targeted biologic therapy directed at the underlying disease.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) involving the central nervous system (CNS) is a rare but serious life-threatening complication seen in recipients of solid organ transplant. Primary CNS encompasses 5–15% of all types of PTLD diagnoses, and heart transplant recipients represent 3–5% of those reported cases. Diagnosis is often delayed due to the highly variable presentation, with some cases remaining undiagnosed for years. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial for early diagnosis and management. A 53-year-old woman patient presented with altered mental status. MRI revealed nodular ventriculitis and bilateral periventricular hyperdense infiltrates. CSF studies demonstrated lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, and EBV-PCR-positive results. A stereotactic brain needle biopsy confirmed the presence of EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, consistent with primary CNS PTLD, 14 months after her heart transplant. Despite appropriate management, the patient experienced progressive neurological decline and ultimately suffered a fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. We demonstrate the importance of the early diagnosis and variable presentation of post-heart-transplant PTLD. The importance of surveillance regardless of EBV status and close monitoring of disease progression due to potential life-threatening complications, such as fatal hemorrhages. Therefore, primary CNS-PTLD remains a challenging disease and is being increasingly recognized with improved transplant recipient survival and prolonged exposure to chronic immunosuppression.

Background: Progressive heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) often requires escalation to temporary or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to transplant (BTT). Following the 2018 UNOS allocation changes, our center revised its BTT strategy to optimize support and shorten wait times. At our institution, the Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist via the axillary approach was selectively used for patients who remained refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy, failed single-inotrope therapy, and were not considered suitable durable LVAD candidates by our multidisciplinary heart team. We compared transplant-related outcomes of BTT patients supported with Impella 5.5 versus durable LVAD. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all heart and heart/kidney transplant candidates at Mayo Clinic Florida from October 2018 to February 2021. INTERMACS profile, baseline characteristics, and perioperative data were collected at the time of device implantation and throughout the transplant hospitalization. Results: A total of 87 heart and 4 heart–kidney transplants were completed. Forty-five patients (49%) required MCS as BTT: 27 (60%) with a durable LVAD and 18 (40%) with an Impella 5.5. All eighteen patients with Impella 5.5 as BTT (100%) were transplanted compared to nineteen patients with durable LVAD (70%), p = 0.001. The median time from listing to transplant was substantially shorter with Impella (32 vs. 696 days, p < 0.001), and this difference persisted across INTERMACS profiles. UNOS status at transplant was more urgent for Impella than LVAD (p < 0.001). Transplant surgery following Impella support required shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (181 vs. 219 min, p < 0.001) and resulted in lower postoperative vasoactive-inotropic requirements (7.9 vs. 13, p = 0.003). No patients in the Impella group died or were delisted while awaiting transplant, whereas 5 LVAD patients (26%) died or were removed due to LVAD complications (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that the use of the Impella 5.5 as BTT was associated with significantly shorter waitlist time, higher transplantation rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and lower postoperative vasoactive support compared with durable LVAD as BTT. These benefits were achieved despite a higher severity of illness at transplantation in the Impella cohort.

Background: Patients with end-stage heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) are conclusively associated with a poor health-related quality of life (HRQL). Axillary mechanical circulatory support (aMCS), such as the Impella 5.5, is increasingly used in this population and may improve HRQL during hospitalization by providing enhanced left ventricular unloading. We aimed to assess changes in HRQL between admission and two weeks after Impella 5.5 placement in patients with HF-CS, using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Methods: We conducted a prospective longitudinal analysis on patients with the Impella 5.5 between May 2023 and July 2023. Participants completed the condensed KCCQ-12 at admission and again two weeks post-implantation. Changes in the scores were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (50–63), and the median ejection fraction at implantation was 20% (15–30). On admission, most patients reported an overall HRQL of poor-to-fair (46.7%) according to the summary KCCQ-12 score. The median overall summary score increased significantly after Impella 5.5 support (50.52 vs. 28.13, p = 0.005). Symptom frequency (70.83 vs. 43.75, p = 0.009) and quality-of-life (50.00 vs. 12.50, p = 0.023) domains improved significantly, while physical limitation showed a positive trend and social limitation remained unchanged. These HRQL improvements occurred alongside a significant shift toward lower SCAI shock stages, marked increases in cardiac output and cardiac index, and no escalation in vasoactive-inotropic requirements. Conclusions: Impella 5.5 support in HF-CS patients was associated with early and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQL, particularly in symptom frequency and quality of life, during the critical pre-transplant or recovery period. These findings suggest that the Impella 5.5 may provide both physiological and patient-perceived benefits in this high-risk population.

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in refractory heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) has risen, leading to potential complications. Post-Cardiac Injury Syndrome (PCIS) from Impella insertion is rare but may result from subclavian artery manipulation and aortic irritation. We report the first case of pericarditis (PCIS) caused by Impella 5.5 insertion in an HFCS patient awaiting heart transplantation. The patient developed chest pain, tachycardia, and hypotension post-Impella insertion. Laboratory results and electrocardiograms confirmed PCIS. Treatment with Ibuprofen and Colchicine was successful. He received a heart transplant 14 days later. This case emphasizes recognizing iatrogenic pericarditis after Impella insertion and the need to avoid additional myocardial strain.

Klippel–Trenaunay (KT) syndrome and Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS) are two distinct medical conditions that rarely coexist, each presenting unique challenges in diagnosis and management. Here, we present a rare case of a 30-year-old male with a history of KT syndrome complicated by recurrent deep vein thrombosis, who presented with symptoms of acute heart failure including shortness of breath, fatigue, dizziness, palpitations, and chest pain and was subsequently diagnosed with isolated CS. We discuss the importance of thorough clinical evaluation and multimodal diagnostic approaches in this complex scenario with overlapping symptoms and diagnostic dilemmas.

Catheter ablation has emerged as a significant treatment approach to treat symptoms and regulate heart rate or rhythm. This review highlights the evolution of catheter ablation, focusing on its applications in atrial fibrillation (AF). Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has become a primary treatment option due to its high success rate and minimal adverse effects. Using three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and mapping systems enhances precision in targeting arrhythmogenic substrates.

Background: Stiff left atrial syndrome is a well-established cause of heart failure symptoms. A parallel entity involving the right atrium (RA) has not previously been described. We present a case of refractory right heart failure (RHF) 12 years following orthotopic heart transplantation. Case summary: Patient underwent annuloplasty ring placement for severe tricuspid regurgitation in 2018 and kidney transplantation in 2020. The use of multimodality imaging and a multidisciplinary approach suggested a stiff RA as a potential etiology to refractory symptoms. Redo-heart and kidney transplantation in March 2021 led to the resolution of symptoms without recurrence. Discussion: We propose stiff right atrial syndrome that may need to be considered in the setting of refractory RHF primarily suggested by significant right atrial enlargement and restrictive physiology.

Introduction: The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of heart transplant patients whose donor hearts were preserved with the SherpaPak controlled cold organ system versus the conventional ice storage technique.Methods: All patients undergoing heart transplantation at our center between January 2019 and April 2021 were divided into two groups according to the technique used during donor heart preservation and transport. The first group consisted of 34 SherpaPak controlled temperature preservation patients, and the second group consisted of 47 patients where the conventional three bags and ice technique was utilized during organ transportation. The two groups were compared based on demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.Results: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS), Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD), and the need for a transient pacer. However, the VIS, PGD, and pacing trends were lower in the SherpaPak patients even though the total ischemic and cardiopulmonary bypass times were significantly longer. Furthermore, SherpaPak patients exhibited a shorter stay in the ICU with no severe PGD and mortality.Conclusion: The SherpaPak donor heart preservation provides safe outcomes in heart transplant patients. Further research is needed to utilize this method for longer durations of ischemic time and expand travel distances for organ transportation.