Preeyaporn Vichaiwattana

SARS-CoV-2 continues to cause recurrent waves in the post-pandemic period, yet genomic data from Southeast Asia remain limited for several emerging Omicron lineages, including NB.1.8.1. In this study, routine acute respiratory infection (ARI) surveillance performed in Bangkok, Thailand, from January to December 2025 was integrated with real-time RT-PCR testing and complete spike-gene sequencing for lineage assignment and evolutionary analysis. Among 4756 ARI specimens, 473 (9.9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Positivity increased in late April, peaked in May (epidemiological week 21; 58.4%), and declined through late June. Lineage typing was successful for 165/473 positive samples (34.9%), identifying 16 Pango lineages. Early 2025 showed heterogeneous circulation, including XEC- and XEC.8-related lineages, whereas NB.1.8.1 predominated during the main wave, accounting for 92.4% of typed cases in May and 89.8% in June. No recombination signals meeting predefined criteria were detected in the spike dataset. The mean spike substitution rate was estimated at 1.11 × 10⁻³ substitutions/site/year (95% HPD, 9.13 × 10⁻⁴–1.31 × 10⁻³), and the major Thai-containing NB.1.8.1 clade had an estimated tMRCA of 17 July 2024. These findings show that routine ARI surveillance combined with spike-based genomics can provide timely insights into SARS-CoV-2 circulation, lineage replacement, and ongoing viral evolution in Thailand.

Since the emergence of COVID-19, the epidemiological and seasonal patterns of respiratory pathogens have shifted, highlighting the need for ongoing surveillance. This study investigated the epidemiology, seasonal trends, and age-specific detection of respiratory viruses among patients with acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in Thailand from January to December 2024. Eight respiratory viruses were detected using multiplex real-time RT-PCR. Of 7853 samples, 60.8% (4777) tested positive. The most frequently detected pathogens were influenza virus (IFV, 24.8%), SARS-CoV-2 (21.5%), and human rhinovirus (HRV, 20.8%). IFV showed biannual peaks during the cold and rainy seasons, SARS-CoV-2 peaked in the warm months, and HRV circulated year-round. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV) were primarily detected during the rainy season (July–November), reflecting a return toward pre–COVID-19 seasonal patterns. Age-specific differences were notable: HRV was most prevalent in children < 5 years, IFV predominated among those aged 6–18 years, and adults ≥ 19 years were mainly positive for IFV and SARS-CoV-2. Co-infections were most frequent in children aged 3–5 years, often involving HRV. These findings provide updated insights into post–COVID-19 viral epidemiology, emphasize the importance of age- and season-specific surveillance, and support the development of effective public health strategies for ARI control.

: Thailand’s Expanded Program on Immunization revised the timing of the second measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine dose to 2.5 years in 2014 and later to 1.5 years in 2020. These adjustments can temporarily reduce vaccine coverage as the population transitions to the new schedules. Combined with disruptions caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, these changes may have adversely affected vaccine uptake and overall population immunity. This study aimed to evaluate the age-specific seroprevalence of anti-measles, anti-mumps, and anti-rubella IgG in individuals across all age groups in Chonburi province, Thailand, following the COVID-19 pandemic. Between October 2022 and January 2023, 650 participants from Chonburi were included and categorized into nine age groups: 70 years. The levels of antibodies were analyzed using commercial ELISA kits. Overall, 77.5%, 55.1%, and 84.1% were seropositive for MMR antibodies, respectively. Adolescents aged 11–20 years had the lowest seropositivity rates for measles (47.0%) and mumps (27.6%), followed by young adults aged 21–30 years. Rubella seropositivity rates were similarly low in these groups. This study highlights immunity gaps for measles in adolescents and young adults. To address this gap and support ongoing measles elimination efforts, targeted interventions, such as supplementary immunization activities with a booster dose of measles-containing vaccines for this age group, are recommended to prevent the potential resurgence of measles in the near future.

Numerous studies have largely focused on short-term immunogenicity in recovered individuals post mRNA vaccination. However, understanding the long-term durability, particularly in inactivated and adenoviral vectored vaccines, remains limited. We evaluated antibody responses, omicron variant neutralization, and IFN-γ responses in 119 previously infected individuals vaccinated with CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 up to six months post-vaccination. Both vaccines elicited robust immune responses in recovered individuals, surpassing those who were infection-naïve, and these persisted above pre-vaccination levels for six months. However, antibody levels declined over time (geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 0.52 for both vaccines). Notably, neutralizing activities against omicron declined faster in ChAdOx1 (GMR = 0.6) compared to CoronaVac recipients (GMR = 1.03). While the first dose of ChAdOx1 adequately induced immune responses in recovered individuals, a second dose demonstrated advantages in omicron variant neutralization and slower decline. Although both vaccines induced T cell responses, the median IFN-γ level at six months returned to pre-vaccination levels. However, more individuals exhibited reactive T cell responses. Extending the interval (13–15 months) between infection and vaccination could enhance antibody levels and broaden neutralization. Together, these findings demonstrate a robust humoral and cellular response that was sustained for at least six months after vaccination, thus guiding optimal vaccination strategies based on prior infection and vaccine platforms.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious illness worldwide. While guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19 have been established, the understanding of the relationship among neutralizing antibodies, cytokines, and the combined use of antiviral medications, steroid drugs, and convalescent plasma therapy remains limited. Here, we investigated the connection between the immunological response and the efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe pneumonia. The study included a retrospective analysis of 49 patients aged 35 to 57. We conducted clinical assessments to determine antibody levels, biochemical markers, and cytokine levels. Among the patients, 48 (98%) were discharged, while one died. We observed significantly higher levels of anti-nucleocapsid, anti-spike, and neutralizing antibodies on days 3, 7, and 14 after the transfusion compared to before treatment. Serum CRP and D-dimer levels varied significantly across these four time points. Moreover, convalescent plasma therapy demonstrated an immunoregulatory effect on cytokine parameters, with significant differences in IFN-β, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-α levels observed at different sampling times. Evaluating the cytokine signature, along with standard clinical and laboratory parameters, may help to identify the onset of a cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients and determine the appropriate indication for anti-cytokine treatment.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continues to surge despite the widespread use of vaccination. In Thailand, more than 77% and 39% of the population received two doses and three doses of COVID-19 vaccines as of December 2022, respectively. In addition, during the Omicron predominant period in 2022, more than 70% of Thai individuals have been infected. To gain comprehensive insight into SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics following vaccination or following vaccination and infection (hybrid immunity), we performed a cross-sectional analysis of sera samples from individuals who received COVID-19 vaccination and/or have been infected with COVID-19 in Thailand between January 2021 and December 2022. A total of 4126 samples were collected. Humoral immunity was evaluated by quantifying the immunoglobulin (including IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes) specific to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) or Ig anti-RBD. The results showed that individuals who received two-dose vaccination alone had lower levels of Ig anti-RBD, which rapidly waned over time. To restore the waning antibody, a third dose vaccination is recommended for uninfected individuals who have only received 2 doses.

Background: Impaired immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines have been observed in autoimmune rheumatic disease patients. Determining the most effective and safe vaccine regimen is critically needed in such a population. We aim to compare the immunogenicity and safety of three COVID-19 vaccine regimens in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: SLE and RA patients aged 18–65 years who received inactivated (CoronaVac or COVILO), adenovirus-vectored (AZD1222), or heterogeneous (AZD1222/BNT162b2) vaccines were enrolled. Humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed at day 28 after the second vaccination. This was performed using the serum binding antibody level against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-RBD Ig) and IFNy-ELISpot assay (ELISpot), respectively. Reactogenicity was reviewed on day 7 following each vaccination. Disease activity was assessed before and on day 28 after the second vaccination. Results: The cohort consisted of 94 patients (64 SLE and 30 RA). Inactivated, AZD1222, and AZD1222/BNT162b2 vaccines were administered to 23, 43, and 28 patients, respectively. Anti-RBD titers were lowest in the inactivated vaccine group (2.84 AU/mL; 95% CI 0.96–8.44), followed by AZD1222 (233.7 AU/mL; 95% CI 99.0–505.5), and AZD1222/BNT162b2 (688.6 AU/mL; 95% CI 271–1745), p < 0.0001. After adjusting for relevant factors, the inactivated vaccine was associated with the lowest humoral response, while adenovirus-vectored/mRNA vaccine was the highest. The proportion of positive ELISpot test was also lowest in the inactivated vaccine group (27%), followed by the adenovirus-vectored vaccine (67%), and the adenovirus-vectored/mRNA vaccine (73%) (p = 0.03). All types of vaccine were well-tolerated. There was no flare of autoimmune disease post-vaccination. Conclusion: Adenovirus-vectored and adenovirus-vectored/mRNA vaccines elicited a stronger humoral and cellular immune response than inactivated vaccines, suggesting that they may be more suitable in SLE and RA patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.