HyeJeong Jeong

Background: The incidence of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection during pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing in clinical practice. This study investigated the clinical significance of preoperative PV/SMV assessment and intraoperative resection and their correlation with pathological results and long-term survival outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 443 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at a tertiary center from 2012 to 2017 based on PV/SMV resection. Subgroup analyses were performed based on preoperative PV/SMV involvement, resection, and margin status. Results: Total of 441 patients were analyzed; 175 had PV/SMV involvement on preoperative radiological assessments and 128 underwent PV/SMV resection. True pathological invasion was observed in 78 patients (60.9%), with 34.3% showing no invasion and negative margins. The positive predictive value for preoperative PV/SMV involvement was 61.7%, with a false-negative value of 28.9%. Overall survival of patients who underwent PV/SMV resection was worse than those who did not (2-year survival rate, 38.1% vs 54.9%, P < 0.001). Patients without PV/SMV resection with an rR1/R1 margin showed no decrease in survival compared to those with PV/SMV resection and R0 margins (54.9% vs 40.3%, P = 0.029). Prognostic factors included hypertension, PV/SMV resection, PV/SMV R2 margin, T stage, N stage, cell differentiation, adjuvant treatment, and recurrence. Conclusion: PV/SMV resection could ensure R0 resection but may lead to unnecessary resection. Careful consideration is essential in determining the need for PV/SMV resection. Poor survival in such patients highlights the need for tailored treatments, including neoadjuvant therapy, for those who are expected to undergo PV/SMV resections.

Jeong H, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Aug;109(2):71-80. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.109.2.71

Jeong HJ, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Apr;108(4):231-239. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.231

Background: Margin status is one of the most significant prognostic factors after curative surgery for middle bile duct (MBD) cancer. Bile duct resection (BDR) is commonly converted to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) to achieve R0 resection. Additionally, adjuvant treatment is actively performed after surgery to improve survival. However, the wider the range of surgery, the higher the chance of complications; this, in turn, makes adjuvant treatment impossible. Nevertheless, no definitive surgical strategy considers the possible complication rates and subsequent adjuvant treatment. We aimed to investigate the appropriate surgical type considering the margin status, complications, and adjuvant treatment in MBD cancer. Materials and Methods: From 2008 to 2017, 520 patients diagnosed with MBD cancer at the Samsung Medical Center were analyzed retrospectively according to the operation type, margin status, complications, and adjuvant treatment. The R1 group was defined as having a carcinoma margin. Results: The 5-year survival rate for patients who underwent R0 and R1 resection was 54.4% and 33.3%, respectively (p = 0.131). Prognostic factors affecting the overall survival were the age, preoperative CA19-9 level, T stage, and N stage, but not the operation type, margin status, complications, or adjuvant treatment. The complication rates were 11.5% and 29.8% in the BDR and PD groups, respectively (p < 0.001). We observed no significant difference in the adjuvant treatment ratio according to complications (p = 0.675). Patients with PD who underwent R0 resection and could not undergo chemotherapy because of complications reported better survival rates than those with BDR who underwent R1 resection after adjuvant treatment (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The survival outcome of patients with R1 margins who underwent BDR did not match those with R0 margins after PD, even after adjuvant treatment. Due to improvements in surgical techniques and the ability to resolve complications, surgical complications exert a marginal effect on survival. Therefore, surgeons should secure R0 margins to achieve the best survival outcomes.

Margin positivity after hilar resection (HR) for bile duct cancer is commonly observed due to its longitudinal spread along the subepithelial plane; nevertheless, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the prognostic effects of margins with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or carcinoma. We aimed to investigate the oncologic effect according to the margin status after HR, particularly between the R1 HGD and the R1 carcinoma. From 2008 to 2017, 149 patients diagnosed with mid-bile duct cancer in Samsung Medical Center, South Korea, were divided according to margin status after HR and retrospectively analyzed. Recurrence patterns were also analyzed between the groups. There were 126 patients with R0 margins, nine with R1 HGD, and 14 with R1 carcinoma. The mean age of the patients was 68.3 (±8.1); most patients were male. The mean age was higher in R1 carcinoma patients than in R1 HGD and R0 patients (p = 0.014). The R1 HGD and R1 carcinoma groups had more patients with a higher T-stage than R0 (p = 0.079). In univariate analysis, the prognostic factors affecting overall survival were age, T- and N-stage, CA19-9, and margin status. The survival rate of R0 was comparable to that of R1 HGD, but the survival rate of R0 was significantly better compared to R1 carcinoma (R0 vs. R1 HGD, p = 0.215, R0 vs. R1 carcinoma, p = 0.042, respectively). The recurrence pattern between the margin groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.604). Extended surgery should be considered for R1 carcinoma; however, in R1 HGD, extended operation may not be necessary, as it may achieve oncologic outcomes similar to R0 margins with HR.

According to the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) should receive chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. This study examined the real-world survival benefits of modifying BRPC treatment guidelines. Patients treated for BRPC at a single institution from 2013 to 2015 (pre-guideline group) and 2017 to 2019 (post-guideline group) were retrospectively reviewed. According to the treatment method used, patients were classified into upfront surgery (US), surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), and chemotherapy only (CO) groups. Overall survival (OS) was compared according to period and treatment type. Factors associated with OS were analyzed using a Cox regression model. Among the 165 patients, 63 were in the pre-guideline group and 102 patients were in the post-guideline group. The median OS was significantly improved in the post-guideline group compared to the pre-guideline group (29 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). According to the treatment method, the median OS of the NAT group was significantly longer than that of the US and CO groups (40 vs. 16 vs. 15 months, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, differentiation, NAT, and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors. NAT is an important treatment option for BRPC and increased patient survival in the real world.

HyeJeong JEONG, Soo Yeun LIM, Hyun Jeong JEON, So Jeong YOON, Hongbeom KIM, In Woong HAN, Jin Seok HEO, Sang Hyun SHIN*. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023;27:S346. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2023S1.EP-79

HyeJeong JEONG, Soo Yeun LIM, Hyun Jeong JEON, So Jeong YOON, Hongbeom KIM, In Woong HAN, Jin Seok HEO, Sang Hyun SHIN*. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023;27:S252. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2023S1.BP-PP-6-4

Background: The clinical course of complete pathologic response (cPR) in pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not well known. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical course of patients according to pathological response, including cPR, who received only FOLIFIRNOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy after FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. cPR was defined as an absence of residual tumor on pathologic report. A nearly complete pathologic response (ncPR) was defined as a tumor confined to pancreas parenchyma, less than 1 cm without lymph-node metastasis. cPR and ncPR were assigned into a favorable pathologic response group (fPR). Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis. Results: Of a total 64 patients, 8 (12.5%) had a cPR and 8 (12.5%) had a ncPR. In the fPR group, median OS and DFS were superior to those of non-pathologic response group (more than 60 months vs. 38 months, p < 0.001; more than 42 months vs. 10 months, p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, fPR and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for OS (HR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02–0.96, p = 0.05; HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09–0.74, p = 0.01) and DFS (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.12–0.86, p = 0.02; HR:0.31; 95% CI: 0.13–0.72, p = 0.01). Conclusions: pathologic response predicts survival after pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant treatment might be beneficial for OS and DFS.

(1) Background: This study identified the clinical outcome and prognostic factors of resected non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma (NADA) in a single tertiary cancer center. (2) Methods: The medical records of 109 patients with NADA who underwent curative surgery between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. (3) Results: The mean age was 62.4 years with a male predominance (70.6%). The majority of tumors were located at the 2nd portion (58.7%). Fifty-seven patients (52.3%) had symptoms at diagnosis. CA19-9 was elevated in 32 patients (29.4%). Of this cohort, most patients were diagnosed as stage III (64.2%). The median overall survival was 92.9 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 84.4%, 71.6%, and 53.7%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, age, symptoms, CA19-9, and margin status were associated with overall survival and symptoms, CA19-9 and margin status were also associated with recurrence. When correlating symptoms with stages, patients with symptoms at diagnosis had more advanced stages (all p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Old age, elevated CA19-9, symptoms, and margin status were independent prognostic factors of NADA, and the patients with symptoms at diagnosis tend to have more advanced stages and a poor prognosis.