WXWu Ximei

Wu Ximei

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Wu Ximei has a total of 2 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Digital Economy and Environmental Sustainability: Do Information Communication and Technology (ICT) and Economic Complexity Matter?

    by Asif Khan, Wu Ximei

    In the current era of digital economy, the role of information communication and technology (ICT) and economic complexity are important for controlling environmental unsustainability and formulating policies to deal with ecological concerns. However, the relationship between digital economy and environment has been studied widely; nevertheless, the relationship between ICT-based digital economy, economic complexity, and ecological footprint has not been studied extensively. Therefore, the aim of current study is to fill the existing gap by investigating the relationship between ICT, economic complexity, and ecological footprint in the case of G-seven (digital) economies. Furthermore, the past research studies were usually based on carbon emissions to measure environmental sustainability, while this study fills the gap using ecological footprint as a proxy for environmental degradation. By using the panel data over the period of 2001–2018 for G-seven economies, this study performs first-generation as well as second-generation unit root testing methods. Findings of both Pesaran’s and B&P’s cross-sectional dependence testing approaches confirm the presence of cross-sectional dependence across all G-seven economies. The empirical findings of cointegration (Pedroni and Kao) tests verify a stable long-run association between ecological footprint, ICT import, ICT export, economic complexity, economic growth, and other control grouped variables. The empirical evidence obtained from the fully modified OLS model suggests that ICT export, economic complexity, and economic growth enhance the intensity of ecological footprint, while ICT import, research and development (RD), and trade are helpful in reducing ecological footprint in G-seven economies. These empirical findings obtained are verified by pooled mean group-ARDL (PMG-ARDL) methodologies and confirm that there is no inconsistency in the results. On the basis of these results, some policy implications for ecological footprint, ICT, and economic complexity are discussed.


  • Open Access

    Digital economy and environmental sustainability: How does ICT affect ecological footprint and what is the role of economic complexity?

    by Asif Khan, Wu Ximei

    In the current era of digital economy, the role of information communication and technology and economic complexity are important for controlling environmental unsustainability and formulating policies to deal with ecological concerns. To inspects the impact of ICT and economic complexity on ecological footprint in G-seven (digital economies) countries from 2001–2018, in the current study we perform first generation as well as second generation unit root testing methods. Findings of both Pesaran’s and B&P’s cross-sectional dependence testing approaches confirms the presence of cross-sectional dependence across all G-seven economies. The empirical findings of cointegration (Pedroni and Kao) tests verify and stable long-run association between ecological footprint, ICT-import, ICT-export, economic complexity, economic growth and other control grouped variables. The empirical evidence obtained from Fully-Modified OLS model suggests that ICT export economic complexity, and economic growth enhance the intensity of ecological footprint, while ICT import, research and development (RD), and trade are helpful to reducing ecological footprint in G-seven economies. These empirical findings obtained from Fully-modified OLS models are also verified by Pooled Mean Group-ARDL(PMG-ARDL) methodologies and confirm that there is no inconsistency in the results. On the basis of these results, some policy implications for ecological footprint, ICT, and economic complexity are discussed.