Heather M. Christiansen

Recognized limitations of fishery-dependent data under rapidly changing management regimes have resulted in significant effort during recent years to improve the availability of fishery-independent data in the southeastern United States. These fishery-independent surveys target numerous species and habitats with various sampling methods, including the use of trawls, longlines, gill nets, traps, and visual surveys. Although passively fished hooked gear (e.g., longlines) are often used to assess the abundance and life history of managed reef fishes, such types of gear are often limited by the habitats they can fish effectively and are species selective. To address these shortcomings, we developed and implemented an actively fished approach to provide fishery-independent data: the repetitive timed-drop hooked-gear method (RTD method). Despite the high degree of standardization applied to the RTD method, important questions remain as to whether active fishing imparts strong angler variability that may reduce the utility of survey data. Accordingly, we analyzed data from 2014 to 2018 to evaluate potential angler bias and how angler-associated variability compares to other factors often thought to be important predictors of reef fish abundance and community structure. During this study, 962 stations were sampled, representing a variety of artificial and natural reef habitats. In total, 5,770 fish were caught, representing 92 taxa. Sampling was conducted by 103 unique anglers, including 42 commercial or charter fishers and 61 scientists. Results from both population- and assemblage-level analyses found that most of the variability in the catch could be explained by hook size, habitat, water depth, and year. Angler type was rarely correlated with reef fish abundance or assemblages. Our analyses suggest that the RTD method is effective in gathering fishery-independent abundance and life history data for reef fishes in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and that the resulting data are not strongly biased by an angler effect.

Data provided by the Southeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program (SEAMAP) shrimp/groundfish trawl survey have long been used in assessing diverse managed taxa, including several reef fishes; however, there are rising concerns over the impacts of trawling on live-bottom habitats. Using data collected from summer SEAMAP trawl surveys (2009–2016; N = 1,103), we examined how avoiding areas of live-bottom habitat might affect the survey's ability to assess interannual changes in abundance of managed reef fish taxa. Trawl samples at 48% of sampling sites contained <50 kg of sponge, and 12% of sampling sites contained at least 50 kg of sponge, while 40% of sites had zero sponge bycatch. Mean number of taxa, taxonomic richness, and taxonomic diversity were significantly higher as sponge bycatch increased, while the total number of individuals remained the same. To examine interannual variability of managed reef fish taxa, annual indices of relative abundance were calculated on different subsets of data (all data, data excluding sites with sponge bycatch ≥50 kg, and data excluding all sites with sponge bycatch). For Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus and pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum, indices and general trends were largely unaffected by excluding sites with sponge, but for most selected taxa (e.g., Gray Triggerfish Balistes capriscus and Red Grouper Epinephelus morio), overall trends were affected by excluding sites that contained sponge bycatch, and in some cases the frequency of occurrence did not meet the requirement to calculate an index of abundance (i.e., <5%) when sponge sites were excluded (e.g., Hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus). Efforts to mitigate survey interactions with live-bottom habitats will likely alter the utility of survey data and the ability to assess managed species, so careful consideration is needed to evaluate any trade-offs between the benefits of the trawl survey for fishery assessments and the benefits of protecting the habitat.