Kartik V. Sastry
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kartik V. Sastry has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David G. Taylor
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
2 shared publications - Michael Joseph Leamy
Georgia Institute of Technology
2 shared publications - Aravind B. Balasubramanian
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1 shared publication Christian E. Viteri
1 shared publicationDavid G. Taylor
1 shared publicationDavid P. Magee
Kilby Labs, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 August 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
- Vol. 181
Two-stage smart charging of commercial electric vehicle fleets to benefit fleet and grid operators
- 17 August 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
- Vol. 181
Open AccessTwo-stage smart charging of commercial electric vehicle fleets to benefit fleet and grid operators
- 21 August 2023
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Vol. 15 (2) , 1926-1938
Decentralized Smart Charging of Electric Vehicles in Residential Settings: Algorithms and Predicted Grid Impact
Unrestricted charging of electric vehicles (EVs) can result in violations of the grid’s operating limits, and/or equipment damage or failure. To address this, we propose a two-stage smart charging (SC) algorithm for EVs in single-family residences. In the first stage, we pose an SC optimization problem considering only the EV owner’s interests. In the second stage, we leverage the existence of multiple optimal (or near-optimal) solutions to this optimization problem to reduce the grid impact of EV charging at no (or negligible) cost to the EV owner. We then assess the grid impact of our SC strategy in a residential area, where all EVs are controlled in a decentralized manner (i.e., independently of one another). For comparison, we also assess the grid impact of rapid charging and other known SC strategies. Our assessment utilizes Monte-Carlo simulation techniques and a physics-based distribution feeder model. Focusing only on the price-minimization SC problem, we show that (i) if existing SC strategies are employed, then SC can have the same undesirable effects as unrestricted, rapid charging, and (ii) if our proposed SC strategies are employed, then SC can significantly lower the grid impact of EV adoption at no additional cost to the EV owner.
- 21 August 2023
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Vol. 15 (2) , 1926-1938
Decentralized Smart Charging of Electric Vehicles in Residential Settings: Algorithms and Predicted Grid Impact
Unrestricted charging of electric vehicles (EVs) can result in violations of the grid’s operating limits, and/or equipment damage or failure. To address this, we propose a two-stage smart charging (SC) algorithm for EVs in single-family residences. In the first stage, we pose an SC optimization problem considering only the EV owner’s interests. In the second stage, we leverage the existence of multiple optimal (or near-optimal) solutions to this optimization problem to reduce the grid impact of EV charging at no (or negligible) cost to the EV owner. We then assess the grid impact of our SC strategy in a residential area, where all EVs are controlled in a decentralized manner (i.e., independently of one another). For comparison, we also assess the grid impact of rapid charging and other known SC strategies. Our assessment utilizes Monte-Carlo simulation techniques and a physics-based distribution feeder model. Focusing only on the price-minimization SC problem, we show that (i) if existing SC strategies are employed, then SC can have the same undesirable effects as unrestricted, rapid charging, and (ii) if our proposed SC strategies are employed, then SC can significantly lower the grid impact of EV adoption at no additional cost to the EV owner.
- 13 April 2022
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Sensors Journal
- Vol. 22 (11) , 10692-10698
Transmitter and Receiver Enhancements for Ultrasonic Distance Sensing Systems
Flexural ultrasonic transducers experience sustained residual vibrations after their excitation has ended. This behavior limits both the minimum range and the range resolution of single-transducer distance sensors operating in pulse-echo mode. Two methods are presented to address residual vibration issues without reducing the intensity of the transmitted pressure waves. The first method is a transmitter enhancement; a number of out-of-phase damping cycles is appended to the desired number of excitation cycles, thereby hastening the decay of the pulse-imposed transducer voltage. The second method is a receiver enhancement; the echo-induced transducer voltage is isolated from the pulse-imposed transducer voltage by subtracting a stored masking signal from the acquired receiver signal. The proposed methods rely on a simple learning procedure that does not require a mathematical model of the system. Because this procedure is executed on an embedded microcontroller, the proposed methods are insensitive to variations in components or parameters. Experiments demonstrate improvements in both minimum range and range resolution.
- 13 April 2022
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Sensors Journal
- Vol. 22 (11) , 10692-10698
Transmitter and Receiver Enhancements for Ultrasonic Distance Sensing Systems
Flexural ultrasonic transducers experience sustained residual vibrations after their excitation has ended. This behavior limits both the minimum range and the range resolution of single-transducer distance sensors operating in pulse-echo mode. Two methods are presented to address residual vibration issues without reducing the intensity of the transmitted pressure waves. The first method is a transmitter enhancement; a number of out-of-phase damping cycles is appended to the desired number of excitation cycles, thereby hastening the decay of the pulse-imposed transducer voltage. The second method is a receiver enhancement; the echo-induced transducer voltage is isolated from the pulse-imposed transducer voltage by subtracting a stored masking signal from the acquired receiver signal. The proposed methods rely on a simple learning procedure that does not require a mathematical model of the system. Because this procedure is executed on an embedded microcontroller, the proposed methods are insensitive to variations in components or parameters. Experiments demonstrate improvements in both minimum range and range resolution.