Aaron P. Jones
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Aaron P. Jones has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bradley M. Robert
Sandia National Laboratories
2 shared publications - Michael C. Trumbo
Sandia National Laboratories
2 shared publications Allen Bagwell
Sandia National Laboratories
1 shared publicationAndrew Mcfarland
Sandia National Laboratories
1 shared publicationAundre J. Marzulli
Sandia National Laboratories
1 shared publicationBradley M. Robert
Sandia National Laboratories
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Cognitive Sciences
- Vol. 1 (1) , 2
Using Eye Tracking to Elucidate the Mechanisms Underlying Stimulation-Enhanced Visual Target Detection
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive form of brain stimulation that involves passing a weak electrical current between electrodes on the scalp to modulate underlying neural tissue. TDCS has been shown to modulate cognition in a variety of domains, including memory, attention, and visual processing. Prior work from our laboratory has shown positive effects of tDCS on learning to detect target objects hidden in complex naturalistic visual scenes and learn rules for categorizing images, though the mechanism for these benefits remains unknown. One possibility is that tDCS optimizes visual search by modulating visual attention or via the reduction in search errors. One method of quantifying visual attention is to use eye tracking to record search patterns to determine if and how visual search is adjusted under verum stimulation conditions. Eye tracking data allows classification of errors into error types, including sampling errors (failing to look in the relevant region), recognition errors (looking at the critical portion of a scene, but failing to recognize it as such as evidenced by visual fixation), and decision-making errors (fixating on the relevant portion of a scene, but making the wrong determination). Our results indicate that the benefit tDCS confers on visual search for targets stems from the reduction in decision-making errors when targets are present (Cohen’s d = 0.86). Also reported is a replication of previous findings showing a tDCS-dependent improvement in learning this task, learning score (Cohen’s d = 0.88); d’ (Cohen’s d = 1.00). This provides support for moving tDCS into the application space by pairing it with analysts who are concerned with the type of search error that is corrected via stimulation.
- 18 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Cognitive Sciences
- Vol. 1 (1) , 2
Open AccessUsing Eye Tracking to Elucidate the Mechanisms Underlying Stimulation-Enhanced Visual Target Detection
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive form of brain stimulation that involves passing a weak electrical current between electrodes on the scalp to modulate underlying neural tissue. TDCS has been shown to modulate cognition in a variety of domains, including memory, attention, and visual processing. Prior work from our laboratory has shown positive effects of tDCS on learning to detect target objects hidden in complex naturalistic visual scenes and learn rules for categorizing images, though the mechanism for these benefits remains unknown. One possibility is that tDCS optimizes visual search by modulating visual attention or via the reduction in search errors. One method of quantifying visual attention is to use eye tracking to record search patterns to determine if and how visual search is adjusted under verum stimulation conditions. Eye tracking data allows classification of errors into error types, including sampling errors (failing to look in the relevant region), recognition errors (looking at the critical portion of a scene, but failing to recognize it as such as evidenced by visual fixation), and decision-making errors (fixating on the relevant portion of a scene, but making the wrong determination). Our results indicate that the benefit tDCS confers on visual search for targets stems from the reduction in decision-making errors when targets are present (Cohen’s d = 0.86). Also reported is a replication of previous findings showing a tDCS-dependent improvement in learning this task, learning score (Cohen’s d = 0.88); d’ (Cohen’s d = 1.00). This provides support for moving tDCS into the application space by pairing it with analysts who are concerned with the type of search error that is corrected via stimulation.
- 15 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 79-98
Effects of Avatar Design on Alarm Resolution in a Virtual Reality Physical Security Scenario
- 15 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 79-98
Effects of Avatar Design on Alarm Resolution in a Virtual Reality Physical Security Scenario
- 16 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 183-201
A Method of Developing Video Stimuli that Are Amenable to Neuroimaging Analysis: An EEG Pilot Study
- 16 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 183-201
A Method of Developing Video Stimuli that Are Amenable to Neuroimaging Analysis: An EEG Pilot Study