Carl J. Nelson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Carl J. Nelson has a total of 28 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Christopher J. Anker
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
2 shared publications- Christopher J. Anker
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
2 shared publications - David J. Seward
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, USA
2 shared publications H. James Wallace
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
2 shared publicationsHavaleh Gagne
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
2 shared publicationsMatthew A. Deeley
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 June 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Advances in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 7 (5) , 100897
Impact of and Response to Cyberattacks in Radiation Oncology
- 18 June 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Advances in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 7 (5) , 100897
Open AccessImpact of and Response to Cyberattacks in Radiation Oncology
- Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Advances in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 6 (1) , 100613
Development of Rapid Response Plan for Radiation Oncology in Response to Cyberattack
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Advances in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 6 (1) , 100613
Open AccessDevelopment of Rapid Response Plan for Radiation Oncology in Response to Cyberattack
- Open Access
- 22 October 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 10 (10) , e3472
Active Surveillance for Medically Inoperable Stage IA Lung Cancer in the Elderly
Treatment for stage IA lung cancer may be too aggressive an approach in elderly patients with competing co-morbidities. We report outcomes for those electing active surveillance (AS) and investigate factors that may predict indolent disease. Retrospective review was performed for 12 consecutive patients, ≥70 years old, with medically inoperable stage IA, T1N0M0 lung cancer and significant co-morbidities, who chose AS with radiation therapy (RT) reserved for clear disease progression. Collected data included Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CDCI) grades, histology, and tumor size changes. Volume doubling time (VDT) calculations used a modified Schwartz equation. Fifteen nodules underwent AS in 12 patients; three patients had more than one nodule. Median age of all patients was 78 (range, 71–85). All patients’ CDCI grades were ≥1, 7 were ≥2. Eleven of 12 patients were deemed to be at high-risk for falls. Twelve nodules in 12 patients were biopsied; adenocarcinoma the prevailing common (47%) histology. The median, one, two and three year patient freedom-from-RT values were 21.4 months (95% CI: 11.6-not reached), 81%, 43%, and 29%, respectively. Median VDT of treated vs. untreated nodules was 189 days (range, 62-infinite) vs. 1153 days (range, 504-infinite), respectively. No patient progressed regionally or distantly, and there have been no cancer-related deaths. Due to cardiovascular events, two patients died and one remains on hospice. Median duration of AS for those still continuing computed tomography (CT) surveillance is 35.1 months. Selected elderly patients with stage IA lung cancer and significant co-morbidities may undergo AS without detriment in outcome. Prospective AS studies are warranted.
- 22 October 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 10 (10) , e3472
Open AccessActive Surveillance for Medically Inoperable Stage IA Lung Cancer in the Elderly
Treatment for stage IA lung cancer may be too aggressive an approach in elderly patients with competing co-morbidities. We report outcomes for those electing active surveillance (AS) and investigate factors that may predict indolent disease. Retrospective review was performed for 12 consecutive patients, ≥70 years old, with medically inoperable stage IA, T1N0M0 lung cancer and significant co-morbidities, who chose AS with radiation therapy (RT) reserved for clear disease progression. Collected data included Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CDCI) grades, histology, and tumor size changes. Volume doubling time (VDT) calculations used a modified Schwartz equation. Fifteen nodules underwent AS in 12 patients; three patients had more than one nodule. Median age of all patients was 78 (range, 71–85). All patients’ CDCI grades were ≥1, 7 were ≥2. Eleven of 12 patients were deemed to be at high-risk for falls. Twelve nodules in 12 patients were biopsied; adenocarcinoma the prevailing common (47%) histology. The median, one, two and three year patient freedom-from-RT values were 21.4 months (95% CI: 11.6-not reached), 81%, 43%, and 29%, respectively. Median VDT of treated vs. untreated nodules was 189 days (range, 62-infinite) vs. 1153 days (range, 504-infinite), respectively. No patient progressed regionally or distantly, and there have been no cancer-related deaths. Due to cardiovascular events, two patients died and one remains on hospice. Median duration of AS for those still continuing computed tomography (CT) surveillance is 35.1 months. Selected elderly patients with stage IA lung cancer and significant co-morbidities may undergo AS without detriment in outcome. Prospective AS studies are warranted.
- Open Access
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
- Vol. 99 (2) , E487
Effect of Tumor Volume Doubling Time on Prognosis for Stage I Non–small Cell Lung Cancers
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
- Vol. 99 (2) , E487
Open AccessEffect of Tumor Volume Doubling Time on Prognosis for Stage I Non–small Cell Lung Cancers