Nathan O. Conner

Nathan O. Conner

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Nathan O. Conner has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Influence of Virtual Reality on Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics During Overground Walking

    by Hunter Derby, Nathan Conner, Adam C. Knight, Harish Chander

    The inability to regain balance following a trip-induced event is one of the leading causes of falls and fall-related injuries in older adults. Virtual reality (VR) has the potential to expose individuals to realistic environments with minimal injury risk compared to real-world exposures. The purpose of this study was to compare lower extremity joint kinematics during overground walking when exposed to real and virtually generated trip obstacles. A total of 14 healthy participants [7 male, 7 female; age: 23.46 ± 3.31 years; height: 173.85 ± 8.46 cm; mass: 82.19 ± 11.41 kg; shoe size (men’s): 9.03 ± 2.71 s] were recruited for this study. Knee and ankle joint kinematics were recorded during obstacle negotiation when exposed to REAL and VR environments. Environmental exposure was assigned in a counterbalanced order to prevent an order effect. Knee and ankle joint kinematics were independently analyzed using a 2 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA to compare environmental conditions and gait type of the lead leg and trail leg at an alpha level of 0.05. No significant differences were observed between environmental conditions. However, significant differences were observed between gait types of the lead leg and trail leg. Current findings reveal similar gait kinematics during obstacle negotiation when exposed to real and virtually generated trip obstacles, suggesting the potential transfer of skill in fall prevention strategies to real-world conditions.


  • Open Access

    Impact of Sub-Clinical and Clinical Compression Socks on Postural Stability Tasks among Individuals with Ankle Instability

    by Hunter Derby, Nathan O. Conner, Amit Talukder, Aaron Griffith, Charles Freeman, Reuben Burch, Jeffrey D. Simpson, Daniel J. Goble, Adam C. Knight, Harish Chander

    Compression socks are used by a very diverse group of individuals and may potentially have a greater impact on physically diminished or impaired individuals as opposed to healthy individuals. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of sub-clinical (SC) and clinical (CL) compression socks among healthy (CON), copers (COP), and individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Postural stability was evaluated in 20 participants (11 males and 9 females) using Balance Tracking System Balance platform (BTrackS™) during the modified clinical test of sensory integration in balance (mCTSIB) and limits of stability (LOS) tests. Postural sway parameters were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance 3 (group: CON, COP, and CAI) by 3 (compression condition: BF, SC, and CL) × 4 (balance condition: EO, EC, EOF, and ECF) for mCTSIB and a 3 (group: CON, COP, and CAI) by 3 (compression condition: BF, SC, CL) × 4 (balance condition: FL, BL, BR, FR) for LOS. Results revealed significantly greater postural stability with both SC and CL compression socks when compared to barefoot conditions. However, no significant differences were observed among groups for compression socks grades. Both SC and CL compression socks may be effective in increasing postural stability.