IEIsabel Galicia Ernst

Isabel Galicia Ernst

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Isabel Galicia Ernst has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    EffectS of Lifestyle Interventions in Older PEople With Obesity (Effective SLOPE): a Systematic Review With Network Meta‐Analyses

    by Gabriel Torbahn, Daniel Schoene, Isabel Galicia Ernst, Lukas Schwingshackl, Gerta Rücker, Helge Knüttel, Wolfgang Kemmler, Cornel C. Sieber, John A. Batsis, Dennis T. Villareal, et al.

    Background/Aim: We conducted a systematic review with network meta‐analyses (NMA) summarizing the effects and safety of lifestyle interventions containing nutrition (NUT; e.g., calorie restriction), exercise (EX; e.g., aerobic/resistance exercise) and behavior change interventions (BCI; e.g., behavioral therapy) on physical function, body composition, quality of life, psychosocial outcomes, health and adverse events in community‐dwelling older adults with obesity. Methods: We used the methodology proposed by Cochrane and searched six databases and one trial registry for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs; intervention duration ≥ 12 weeks) up to May 2022 with a full new search in MEDLINE and a re‐assessment of previously identified eligible trial registry entries in October 2025. Random‐effects NMA ((standardized) mean difference ((S)MD), 95% confidence intervals) were conducted if possible. Results: We included 72 RCTs ( n = 6716) for descriptive summaries and 54 RCTs ( n = 4249) for NMA. NUT+EX+BCI improved physical function (performance batteries) compared to control (SMD 3.37 [1.76;4.97]; high certainty of evidence). NUT+EX+BCI may reduce body (MD −8.69 [−13.14;−4.25]) and fat mass (MD −6.58 [−10.44;−2.73]) while not negatively affecting fat‐free mass (MD −1.38 [−3.52;0.76]) or bone mineral density (MD −0.01 [−0.05;0.02]) (evidence very uncertain). Other interventions (single/combined) may also be effective; however, effects were often imprecise. For psychosocial outcomes, quality of life, and health events, data were insufficient or too heterogeneous to derive clear results. Conclusion: The evidence suggests that NUT+EX+BCI interventions are most suitable for the management of obesity in older adults. Nevertheless, further RCTs—especially in frail populations and on patient‐relevant outcomes—are needed.


  • Open Access

    Malnutrition in nursing home residents: A nutritionDay analysis of staff judgment of residents’ nutritional status and a validated tool

    by Isabel Galicia Ernst, Hanna Siebentritt, Silvia Tarantino, Michael Hiesmayr, Dorothee Volkert

  • Open Access

    Obesity in European nursing homes participating in nutritionDay 2016–2021—Prevalence and resident characteristics

    by Isabel Galicia Ernst, Isabella Worf, Silvia Tarantino, Michael Hiesmayr, Dorothee Volkert

    Summary: The objective of this study is to assess obesity prevalence and characterize European nursing home (NH) residents with obesity comprehensively. Cross‐sectional nutritionDay data from 2016 to 2021. Descriptive characterization of European NH residents ≥65 years with and without obesity. Binomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with obesity. A total of 11 327 residents (73.8% female, 86.4 ± 7.9 years, mean body mass index 25.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2) from 12 countries were analysed. Obesity prevalence was 17.7%, mostly class I (13.0%). Taking ≥5 drugs/day (OR 1.633; 95% confidence intervals 1.358–1.972), female sex (1.591; 1.385–1.832), being bed/chair‐bound (1.357; 1.146–1.606), and having heart/circulation/lung disease (1.276; 1.124–1.448) was associated with increased obesity risk, older age (0.951; 0.944–0.958), mild (0.696; 0.601–0.805) and severe (0.591; 0.488–0.715) dementia, eating less than ¾ of lunch on nutritionDay (0.669; 0.563–0.793), needing assistance for eating (0.686; 0.569–0.825), and being identified by NH staff at risk for (0.312; 0.255–0.380) or with malnutrition (0.392; 0.236–0.619) decreased obesity risk. Almost one in five residents in European NH participating in nutritionDay is affected by obesity. Through a wide exploratory analysis, including data from 12 European countries, we confirmed previous findings and identified additional factors associated with obesity that should be considered in the daily care of affected residents.


  • Open Access

    Outcomes addressed in randomized controlled lifestyle intervention trials in community‐dwelling older people with (sarcopenic) obesity—An evidence map

    by Isabel Galicia Ernst, Gabriel Torbahn, Lukas Schwingshackl, Helge Knüttel, Robert Kob, Wolfgang Kemmler, Cornel C. Sieber, John A. Batsis, Dennis T. Villareal, Nanette Stroebele‐Benschop, et al.

    Summary: Obesity and sarcopenic obesity (SO) are characterized by excess body fat with or without low muscle mass affecting bio‐psycho‐social health, functioning, and subsequently quality of life in older adults. We mapped outcomes addressed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on lifestyle interventions in community‐dwelling older people with (sarcopenic) obesity. Systematic searches in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science were conducted. Two reviewers independently performed screening and extracted data on outcomes, outcome domains, assessment methods, units, and measurement time. A bubble chart and heat maps were generated to visually display results. Fifty‐four RCTs (7 in SO) reporting 464 outcomes in the outcome domains: physical function (n = 42), body composition/anthropometry (n = 120), biomarkers (n = 190), physiological (n = 30), psychological (n = 47), quality of life (n = 14), pain (n = 4), sleep (n = 2), medications (n = 3), and risk of adverse health events (n = 5) were included. Heterogeneity in terms of outcome definition, assessment methods, measurement units, and measurement times was found. Psychological and quality of life domains were investigated in a minority of studies. There is almost no information beyond 52 weeks. This evidence map is the first step of a harmonization process to improve comparability of RCTs in older people with (sarcopenic) obesity and facilitate the derivation of evidence‐based clinical decisions.