Linda Legzdiņa
Research Subjects
Linda Legzdiņa has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Aija Vaivode
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Priekuļi Research Centre
1 shared publication- Arturs Viksna
University of Latvia
1 shared publication - Dace Piliksere
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Priekuļi Research Centre
1 shared publication - Dace Piliksere
Crop Research Department, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Zinātnes 2, LV-4126 Priekuļi, Latvia
1 shared publication Elga Ivdre
Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Riga Technical University
1 shared publication- Gunita Celma
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Latvia, 1004 Riga, Latvia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 November 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Proceedings
- Vol. 92 (1) , 19
Variation of Carbon- and Nitrogen-Stable Isotope Ratios in Conventionally and Organically Fertilized Cereals at Different Growth Stages
Over recent decades, the cereal grain market has experienced notable changes
- 21 November 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Proceedings
- Vol. 92 (1) , 19
Open AccessVariation of Carbon- and Nitrogen-Stable Isotope Ratios in Conventionally and Organically Fertilized Cereals at Different Growth Stages
Over recent decades, the cereal grain market has experienced notable changes
- Open Access
- 6 August 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 14 (15) , 9697
Agronomic Performance of Heterogeneous Spring Barley Populations Compared with Mixtures of Their Parents and Homogeneous Varieties
Diversity within a crop of self-pollinating species can provide advantages in sustainable farming, including the ability to adapt to environments. However, few results proving the benefits in various species and climatic conditions are available. Our aim was to find the differences between heterogeneous and homogeneous materials and determine if crossing has advantage over mixing. We compared essential traits of twelve heterogeneous spring barley composite cross populations (CCPs) to those of seven mixtures representing similar genetic backgrounds and five homogeneous varieties in nine organic and three conventional environments over the course of three years. We found significant advantages for heterogeneous materials, particularly CCPs, for yield in organic and stress environments as well as yield stability, N utilisation efficiency, protein content, 1000-grain weight, and net blotch severity and observed positive trends for N uptake efficiency and weed competitiveness. CCPs’ advantages over mixtures were for protein content and 1000-grain weight, a nonsignificant yield gain in low-yield and stress environments, higher yield stability, and minor positive trends for net blotch, NUE, and weed competitiveness. We suggest heterogeneous populations as valuable alternatives to uniform varieties for organic and poor cultivation environments. Although multi-component mixtures could provide a performance similar to CCPs, considering the adaptation potential, populations would be more advantageous overall.
- 6 August 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 14 (15) , 9697
Open AccessAgronomic Performance of Heterogeneous Spring Barley Populations Compared with Mixtures of Their Parents and Homogeneous Varieties
Diversity within a crop of self-pollinating species can provide advantages in sustainable farming, including the ability to adapt to environments. However, few results proving the benefits in various species and climatic conditions are available. Our aim was to find the differences between heterogeneous and homogeneous materials and determine if crossing has advantage over mixing. We compared essential traits of twelve heterogeneous spring barley composite cross populations (CCPs) to those of seven mixtures representing similar genetic backgrounds and five homogeneous varieties in nine organic and three conventional environments over the course of three years. We found significant advantages for heterogeneous materials, particularly CCPs, for yield in organic and stress environments as well as yield stability, N utilisation efficiency, protein content, 1000-grain weight, and net blotch severity and observed positive trends for N uptake efficiency and weed competitiveness. CCPs’ advantages over mixtures were for protein content and 1000-grain weight, a nonsignificant yield gain in low-yield and stress environments, higher yield stability, and minor positive trends for net blotch, NUE, and weed competitiveness. We suggest heterogeneous populations as valuable alternatives to uniform varieties for organic and poor cultivation environments. Although multi-component mixtures could provide a performance similar to CCPs, considering the adaptation potential, populations would be more advantageous overall.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry in Zemdirbyste-Agriculture
- Vol. 105 (4) , 315-322
Effect of genotype and crop management systems on the content of antioxidants in hulless and covered spring barley
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry in Zemdirbyste-Agriculture
- Vol. 105 (4) , 315-322
Open AccessEffect of genotype and crop management systems on the content of antioxidants in hulless and covered spring barley