Christian Staackmann

Background/Objectives: Patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with taxanes or platin derivates often develop peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Higher-grade CIPN generally affects the patient’s quality of life. Because the treatment options for CIPN are limited, early diagnosis is desirable to allow for timely modifications of the treatment. This may be facilitated with scoring tools that are ideally usable by the patients. A prospective study suggested that a recently developed self-assessment tool might be able to reveal the difference between the absence of CIPN and higher-grade CIPN. When CIPN has reached an advanced grade, alteration of the chemotherapy regimen may have only a limited effect. Therefore, it is important to know whether the new scoring tool can identify CIPN even when it is still mild. The current trial (NCT07604441) aims to identify the optimal cutoff point value for detecting mild CIPN. Given the limited sample size, the derived cutoff will be considered preliminary and will require validation in a larger independent cohort. Methods: The NEURO-BREAC-02 trial aims to identify the optimal cutoff point value of the new tool to distinguish between absent and mild CIPN after treatment with taxanes for breast cancer. Scores ranging between 0 and 44 points are reported via self-assessment supported by a neuropathy tracker. Secondly, the satisfaction of participants with the self-assessment tool is evaluated. Twenty-six participants (19 with mild CIPN and 7 without CIPN) are required, and 28 must be enrolled. Conclusions: The outcomes of the NEURO-BREAC-02 trial are considered crucial for the creation of a self-assessment tool to identify mild CIPN in patients with breast cancer and are a necessary addition to the preceding NEURO-BREAC study.

Background/Objectives: A considerable number of patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) and a longer expected lifespan do not receive upfront surgery but radiation therapy alone. These patients were suggested to benefit from radiation programs with total doses > 30 Gy in terms of better local progression-free survival (LPFS). A previous study compared such regimens, namely 15 × 2.633 Gy over three weeks (34 patients, prospective cohort) and 20 × 2.0 Gy over four weeks (239 patients, control), using a propensity score-adjusted approach. Both regimens were associated with similar rates of overall survival (OS) and LPFS. However, follow-up was limited to 12 months. For long-term survivors, a longer period of follow-up would be desirable. Therefore, the present study was initiated. Methods: Retrospective collection of additional data enabled us to provide OS- and LPFS-rates at 36 months following radiation therapy. Results: In the prospective cohort, 36-month rates of OS and LPFS were 27.0% and 89.7%, respectively. After application of the propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model, 36-month OS-rates (HR 1.454; 95% CI 0.748–2.828; p = 0.270) and LPFS-rates (HR 0.311; 95% CI 0.041–2.352; p = 0.258) appeared not considerably different. Late radiation myelopathy and pathologic vertebral fractures were not identified. Conclusions: The results of the current study suggest that the role of 15 × 2.633 Gy should be further investigated in selected patients with MSCC, particularly when considering its shorter overall treatment time in comparison to 20 × 2.0 Gy. Overall, our findings are hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.

Background/Objectives: Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive chemo- and/or immunotherapy, which can be associated with adverse events including fatigue. Affected patients may not be able to receive the complete chemo- and/or immunotherapy as planned. In this context, patients may benefit from maintaining their physical activity, which can be challenging. An app reminding patients to perform a certain number of steps may have a positive effect on physical activity during chemo- and/or immunotherapy. Such an app is under development and will be tested in a prospective trial. The current APACHIE-01 study (NCT06993896) is required for proper sample size calculation and design of the planned trial. Methods: The main goal of the APACHIE-01 study is to evaluate patterns and predictors of physical activity during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. The primary endpoint is the assessment of the mean number of steps per week during the first three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer. The baseline value is represented by the mean number of steps during the last week prior to chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Secondary endpoints include associations between mean number of steps per week and a pain score, a distress score, and a fatigue score. The recruitment of the required 38 patients should be completed within 4 months and the treatment period will be 9–10 weeks (three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy), resulting in a total running time of approximately 6 months. The APACHIE-01 study will contribute to the optimal design of a subsequent prospective trial.

Background: Radiotherapy of breast cancer can be associated with dermatitis. Grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis can be painful and impair the patients’ quality of life. To reduce the risk of this complication, patients have to perform skin care several times each day. This may require a considerable level of compliance. This randomized DAI-BREAC trial investigates whether a mobile application reminding the patients four times per day to perform skin care (reminder app) will contribute to reduction of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis. Methods: This multinational, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial compares standard skin care supported by a reminder app (Arm A) versus standard skin care alone (Arm B) regarding grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. The effect of the app will be considered clinically relevant, if the rate of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis is reduced from 25.4% (rate identified in a preceding study) to 15%. A total of 134 patients per arm including drop-outs are required. Secondary aims include pain (visual analogue scale), patient satisfaction with the app (questionnaire), impact of the app on the use of health technology (questionnaire), and benefit from support (coaching) by staff members regarding the use of the app (questionnaire). Discussion: If the reminder app contributes to a decrease of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated for breast cancer, it will likely become a useful instrument for these patients. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06483477; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT06483477). Registered on 1st of July, 2024. First patient was included in December 2024.

Background Radiotherapy of breast cancer can be associated with dermatitis. Grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis can be painful and impair the patients’ quality of life. To reduce the risk of this complication, patients have to perform skin care several times each day. This may require a considerable level of compliance. This randomized DAI-BREAC trial investigates whether a mobile application reminding the patients four times per day to perform skin care (reminder app) will contribute to reduction of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis. Methods This multinational, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial compares standard skin care supported by a reminder app (Arm A) versus standard skin care alone (Arm B) regarding grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. The effect of the app will be considered clinically relevant, if the rate of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis is reduced from 25.4% (rate identified in a preceding study) to 15%. A total of 134 patients per arm including drop-outs are required. Secondary aims include pain (visual analogue scale), patient satisfaction with the app (questionnaire), impact of the app on the use of health technology (questionnaire), and benefit from support (coaching) by staff members regarding the use of the app (questionnaire). Discussion If reminder app contributes to a decrease of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated for breast cancer, it will likely become a useful instrument for these patients. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06483477; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT06483477). Registered on 1st of July, 2024. First patient is planned to be included in September 2024.

Many patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) who are not candidates for neurosurgery receive radiotherapy alone. This study compared 15 × 2.633 Gy over three weeks to 20 × 2.0 Gy over four weeks in patients with favorable survival prognoses. The outcomes of 34 patients treated with 15 × 2.633 Gy (equivalent dose 41.6 Gy₁₀) in the RAMSES-01 trial were compared to 239 patients from an existing database receiving 20 × 2.0 Gy using propensity-score-adjusted Cox and logistic regression models. All patients had favorable survival prognoses. Endpoints included local progression-free survival (LPFS), improvement of motor function, post-treatment ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). After propensity score adjustment, the 12-month rates of LPFS and OS were 98.1% (RAMSES-01 cohort) vs. 91.6% (p = 0.265) and 79.1% vs. 82.2% (p = 0.704), respectively. Regarding improvement of motor function, 15 × 2.633 Gy appeared superior (p = 0.073). No significant difference was observed regarding ambulatory status (p = 0.822). The three-week regimen for MSCC has similar outcomes and reduces treatment time when compared to a four-week regimen.

Patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and favorable survival prognoses may benefit from radiation doses exceeding 10 × 3.0 Gy. In a multi-center phase 2 trial, patients receiving 15 × 2.633 Gy (41.6 Gy₁₀) or 18 × 2.333 Gy (43.2 Gy₁₀) were evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor/sensory functions, ambulatory status, pain, distress, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). They were compared (propensity score-adjusted Cox regression) to a historical control group (n = 266) receiving 10 × 3.0 Gy (32.5 Gy₁₀). In the phase 2 cohort, 50 (of 62 planned) patients were evaluated for LPFS. Twelve-month rates of LPFS and OS were 96.8% and 69.9%, respectively. Motor and sensory functions improved in 56% and 57.1% of patients, and 94.0% were ambulatory following radiotherapy. Pain and distress decreased in 84.4% and 78.0% of patients. Ten and two patients experienced grade 2 and 3 toxicities, respectively. Phase 2 patients showed significantly better LPFS than the control group (p = 0.039) and a trend for improved motor function (p = 0.057). Ambulatory and OS rates were not significantly different. Radiotherapy with 15 × 2.633 Gy or 18 × 2.333 Gy was well tolerated and appeared superior to 10 × 3.0 Gy.

Patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and favorable survival prognoses may benefit from radiation doses exceeding 10 x 3.0 Gy. In a multi-center phase 2 trial, patients receiving 15 x 2.633 Gy (41.6 Gy10) or 18 x 2.333 Gy (43.2 Gy10) were evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor/sensory functions, ambulatory status, pain, distress, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). They were compared (propensity score adjusted Cox regression) to a historical control group (N=266) receiving 10 x 3.0 Gy (32.5 Gy10). In the phase 2-cohort, 50 (of 62 planned) patients were evaluable for LPFS. Twelve-month rates of LPFS and OS were 96.8% and 69.9%, respectively. Motor and sensory functions improved in 56% and 57.1% of patients, and 94.0% were ambulatory following radiotherapy. Pain and distress decreased in 84.4% and 78.0% of patients. Ten and two patients experienced grade 2 and 3 toxicities, respectively. Phase 2 patients showed significantly better LPFS than the control group (p = 0.039) and a trend for improved motor function (p = 0.057). Ambulatory and OS rates were not significantly different. Radiotherapy with 15 x 2.633 Gy or 18 x 2.333 Gy was well tolerated and appeared superior to 10 x 3.0 Gy.

Estimating post-treatment ambulatory status can improve treatment personalization of patients irradiated for malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC). A new clinical score was developed from data of 283 patients treated with radiotherapy alone in prospective trials. Radiotherapy regimen, age, gender, tumor type, interval from tumor diagnosis to MSCC, number of affected vertebrae, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, time developing motor deficits, ambulatory status, performance score, sensory deficits, and sphincter dysfunction were evaluated. For factors with prognostic relevance in the multivariable logistic regression model after backward stepwise variable selection, scoring points were calculated (post-radiotherapy ambulatory rate in % divided by 10) and added for each patient. Four factors (primary tumor type, sensory deficits, sphincter dysfunction, ambulatory status) were used for the instrument that includes three prognostic groups (17–21, 22–31, and 32–37 points). Post-radiotherapy ambulatory rates were 10%, 65%, and 97%, respectively, and 2-year local control rates were 100%, 75%, and 88%, respectively. Positive predictive values to predict ambulatory and non-ambulatory status were 97% and 90% using the new score, and 98% and 79% using the previous instrument. The new score appeared more precise in predicting non-ambulatory status. Since patients with 32–37 points had high post-radiotherapy ambulatory and local control rates, they may not require surgery.