Miriam A. Osei

Problem: Approximately 100,000 individuals in the United States have sickle cell disease (SCD). These individuals face multiple barriers to equitable care. At Brigham and Women’s Hospital, existing health inequities for these patients were compounded by admitting, rounding, and team structures that assigned patients with SCD to multiple medicine teams with a hematologist attending, leading to delays in patient care and gaps in residents’ hematology knowledge. Approach: A hematology–general medicine hybrid team was created in September 2021 to enhance trainee knowledge, skill, and confidence in managing hematology conditions and improve the quality of care delivered to individuals with SCD. This allowed for regionalization of patients with classical hematology conditions to specific hospital floors under the care of one team with a hematologist as the attending of record. Outcomes: From October 1, 2021, to January 11, 2022, the majority (745/824, 90%) of in-hospital days for patients with a primary hematology diagnosis were under the care of the hematology–general medicine hybrid team. Regionalization to the home floor of the hybrid team was achieved on 331 (40%) of these 824 hospital days, consistent with regionalization rates for other teams. From October 1, 2021, to September 30, 2022, there were 128 unique patients with SCD admitted over 511 encounters and cared for by approximately 78 residents and 12 medical students. Feedback from residents reported improved knowledge in the management of hematology conditions, especially SCD. Next Steps: The authors are working on a comprehensive analysis of the hybrid team’s impact on trainee skill and confidence in managing SCD. The authors believe that this model can be replicated at other institutions to optimize trainee education, consolidate care, and address implicit bias against patients with SCD, even with the hematology attending as a consultant instead of as the attending of record.

Background: Unequal access to telemedicine services exacerbates health inequities and was evident at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to explore whether unequal access persisted within a classical hematology division beyond the peak of COVID-19. Methods: Patient demographics by virtual visit type (telephone only [TO] or video only [VO]) between March 2020 and December 2021 were analyzed using adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Results: Of 8,207 patients, 18.4% had TO and 28.4% had VO visits. Fewer Black (21.8%; aOR 0.5 [0.4–0.62]), Hispanic or Latino (18.8%; 0.45 [0.34–0.59]), Spanish-speaking (7.6%; 0.32 [0.19–0.54]), high school (21.2%; 0.64 [0.52–0.78]), and older (24.2%) patients used VO compared with White (30.6%), English-speaking (29.5%), college (31%), postgraduate (34.9%), and younger (35.4%) patients. Conclusions: Groups that historically experience health inequities had fewer VO visits during and beyond the pandemic peak. Thus, there is a need to continue digital inclusion efforts to promote video access equity.

This study establishes a Duffy null phenotype–specific absolute neutrophil count reference range to optimize care and improve health equity.

Many people of African ancestry have lower absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) without increased risk for infection. This is associated with the Duffy-null phenotype (nonexpression of the Duffy antigen on red blood cells), which is commonly found in those of African descent. Currently, there are no studies that compare the ANC of individuals with Duffy-null phenotype to those with Duffy non-null phenotypes within a self-identified Black population. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Duffy status on ANCs based on complete blood counts with differential and Duffy testing in a healthy population of self-identified Black individuals at a single primary care center. This study found that 66.7% (80 of 120) of Black individuals have the Duffy-null phenotype and that there is a significant difference in ANCs between Duffy-null and Duffy non-null individuals (median, 2820 cells per μL vs 5005 cells per μL; P < .001). Additionally, 19 of 80 (23.8%) Duffy-null individuals had an ANC of <2000 cells per μL compared with no (0) Duffy non-null individuals. The Duffy-null phenotype is clinically insignificant; however, inappropriate reference ranges can propagate systemic racism. Therefore, we advocate for the development of Duffy-null–specific ANC reference ranges as well as replacing the term benign ethnic neutropenia with Duffy-nullassociated neutrophil count.