Lisa S. Peterson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Lisa S. Peterson has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Victor Villarreal
The University of Texas at San Antonio
3 shared publications - Anna C. J. Long
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University
1 shared publication - Antoinette Halsell Miranda
The Ohio State University
1 shared publication - Cixin Wang
Department of Counseling, Higher Education, & Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
1 shared publication Daniela M. Cortes
University of Texas at San Antonio
1 shared publication- Elisa Steele Shernoff
School Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 December 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in School Psychology Review
- p. 1-17
Applying the Critical School Psychology Framework to Address the Leaky Student-to-Faculty Pipeline in School Psychology
- 8 December 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in School Psychology Review
- p. 1-17
Open AccessApplying the Critical School Psychology Framework to Address the Leaky Student-to-Faculty Pipeline in School Psychology
- 21 October 2024
- Published by Wiley in Journal of School Health
- Vol. 94 (12) , 1196-1199
Ethical Considerations in School‐Based Mental Health Screening and Service Provision—A Commentary
- 21 October 2024
- Published by Wiley in Journal of School Health
- Vol. 94 (12) , 1196-1199
Ethical Considerations in School‐Based Mental Health Screening and Service Provision—A Commentary
- 2 May 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Contemporary School Psychology
- p. 1-11
Mental Health Screening: Recommendations from an Integrated Literature Review
- 2 May 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Contemporary School Psychology
- p. 1-11
Mental Health Screening: Recommendations from an Integrated Literature Review
- 23 August 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in School Psychology Review
- Vol. 52 (2) , 130-143
Meta-Analysis of Proportions of Students Screened and Identified in Mental Health Multiple-Gate Screening Research
We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.
- 23 August 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in School Psychology Review
- Vol. 52 (2) , 130-143
Meta-Analysis of Proportions of Students Screened and Identified in Mental Health Multiple-Gate Screening Research
We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.