Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Devi D. Nelakurti has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Comprehensive Analysis of Human Colorectal Cancers Harboring Polymerase Epsilon Mutations

    by Louis M. Gibson, Phanithan Konda, Hunter J. Bliss, Devi D. Nelakurti, Golrokh Mirzaei, Renee A. Bouley, Jing J. Wang, Ruben C. Petreaca

    DNA polymerase epsilon (POLe) is the leading strand replicative polymerase. POLe mutations located primarily in the proofreading domain cause replication errors and increase mutation burden in cancer cells. Consequently, POLe has been classified as a cancer driver gene. Certain POLe frameshift mutations that affect the proofreading domain are purified in cancer cells, but point mutations in other domains have also been reported. Here we use an artificial intelligence algorithm to determine what other mutations co-occur with POLe mutations in colorectal cancers. We partitioned POLe mutations into driver, passenger, and WT (no mutation), then assessed mutations in other genes in these three groups. We found that a driver POLe mutation is not likely to associate with driver mutations in other genes. Thus, driver mutations in colorectal cancers appear to purify in a manner that is independent of POLe. Mutations that affect POLe function do not necessarily increase the frequency of driver mutations in other genes. Structural analysis shows that many POLe driver mutations affect coordination of the Mg2+ ion in the active site. Our data show that the accumulation of colorectal cancer mutations is driven by complex factors.

  • Open Access

    Virtual CT Myelography: A Patch-Based Machine Learning Model to Improve Intraspinal Soft Tissue Visualization on Unenhanced Dual-Energy Lumbar Spine CT

    by Xuan V. Nguyen, Devi D. Nelakurti, Engin Dikici, Sema Candemir, Daniel J. Boulter, Luciano M. Prevedello

    Background: Distinguishing between the spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) non-invasively on CT is challenging due to their similar mass densities. We hypothesize that patch-based machine learning applied to dual-energy CT can accurately distinguish CSF from neural or other tissues based on the center voxel and neighboring voxels. Methods: 88 regions of interest (ROIs) from 12 patients’ dual-energy (100 and 140 kVp) lumbar spine CT exams were manually labeled by a neuroradiologist as one of 4 major tissue types (water, fat, bone, and nonspecific soft tissue). Four-class classifier convolutional neural networks were trained, validated, and tested on thousands of nonoverlapping patches extracted from 82 ROIs among 11 CT exams, with each patch representing pixel values (at low and high energies) of small, rectangular, 3D CT volumes. Different patch sizes were evaluated, ranging from 3 × 3 × 3 × 2 to 7 × 7 × 7 × 2. A final ensemble model incorporating all patch sizes was tested on patches extracted from six ROIs in a holdout patient. Results: Individual models showed overall test accuracies ranging from 99.8% for 3 × 3 × 3 × 2 patches (N = 19,423) to 98.1% for 7 × 7 × 7 × 2 patches (N = 1298). The final ensemble model showed 99.4% test classification accuracy, with sensitivities and specificities of 90% and 99.6%, respectively, for the water class and 98.6% and 100% for the soft tissue class. Conclusions: Convolutional neural networks utilizing local low-level features on dual-energy spine CT can yield accurate tissue classification and enhance the visualization of intraspinal neural tissue.


  • Open Access

    Arginine Depletion in Human Cancers

    by Devi D. Nelakurti, Tiffany Rossetti, Aman Y. Husbands, Ruben C. Petreaca

    Arginine is encoded by six different codons. Base pair changes in any of these codons can have a broad spectrum of effects including substitutions to twelve different amino acids, eighteen synonymous changes, and two stop codons. Four amino acids (histidine, cysteine, glutamine, and tryptophan) account for over 75% of amino acid substitutions of arginine. This suggests that a mutational bias, or “purifying selection”, mechanism is at work. This bias appears to be driven by C > T and G > A transitions in four of the six arginine codons, a signature that is universal and independent of cancer tissue of origin or histology. Here, we provide a review of the available literature and reanalyze publicly available data from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). Our analysis identifies several genes with an arginine substitution bias. These include known factors such as IDH1, as well as previously unreported genes, including four cancer driver genes (FGFR3, PPP6C, MAX, GNAQ). We propose that base pair substitution bias and amino acid physiology both play a role in purifying selection. This model may explain the documented arginine substitution bias in cancers.


  • Open Access

    Comprehensive Analysis of MEN1 Mutations and Their Role in Cancer

    by Devi D. Nelakurti, Amrit L. Pappula, Swetha Rajasekaran, Wayne O. Miles, Ruben C. Petreaca

    MENIN is a scaffold protein encoded by the MEN1 gene that functions in multiple biological processes, including cell proliferation, migration, gene expression, and DNA damage repair. MEN1 is a tumor suppressor gene, and mutations that disrupts MEN1 function are common to many tumor types. Mutations within MEN1 may also be inherited (germline). Many of these inherited mutations are associated with a number of pathogenic syndromes of the parathyroid and pancreas, and some also predispose patients to hyperplasia. In this study, we cataloged the reported germline mutations from the ClinVar database and compared them with the somatic mutations detected in cancers from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database. We then used statistical software to determine the probability of mutations being pathogenic or driver. Our data show that many confirmed germline mutations do not appear in tumor samples. Thus, most mutations that disable MEN1 function in tumors are somatic in nature. Furthermore, of the germline mutations that do appear in tumors, only a fraction has the potential to be pathogenic or driver mutations.