Juan Du

Inhibition of the Embryonic Ectoderm Development (EED) subunit in Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) can inhibit tumor growth. In this paper, we selected six experimentally designed EED competitive Inhibitors of the triazolopyrimidine derivatives class. We investigated the difference in the binding mode of the natural substrate to the Inhibitors and the effects of differences in the parent nuclei, heads, and tails of the Inhibitors on the inhibitory capacity. The results showed that the binding free energy of this class of Inhibitors was close to or lower compared to the natural substrate, providing an energetic basis for competitive inhibition. For the Inhibitors, the presence of a strong negatively charged group at the 6-position of the parent nucleus or the 8′-position of the head would make the hydrogen atom on the head imino group prone to flip, resulting in the vertical movement of the parent nucleus, which significantly decreased the inhibitory ability. When the 6-position of the parent nucleus was a nonpolar group, the parent nucleus would move horizontally, slightly decreasing the inhibitory ability. When the 8′-position of the head was methylene, it formed an intramolecular hydrophobic interaction with the benzene ring on the tail, resulting in a significant increase in inhibition ability.

The overexpression of p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) is associated with a variety of cancers. In this paper, the binding modes and inhibitory mechanisms of four 7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine competitive inhibitors of PAK4 were investigated at the molecular level, mainly using molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations. The results show that the inhibitors had strong interactions with the hinge region, the β-sheets, and the residues with charged side chains around the 4-substituent. The terminal amino group of the inhibitor 5n was different from the other three, which could cause the enhancement of hydrogen bonds or electrostatic interactions formed with the surrounding residues. Thus, inhibitor 5n had the strongest inhibition capacity. The different halogen atoms on the 2-substituents of the inhibitors 5h, 5g, and 5e caused differences in the positions of the 2-benzene rings and affected the interactions of the hinge region. It also affected to some extent the orientations of the 4-imino groups and consequently their affinities for the surrounding charged residues. The combined results lead to the weakest inhibitory capacity of inhibitor 5e.

E. coli thioesterase ‘TesA is an important enzyme in fatty acid production. Medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs, C6-C10) are of great interest due to their similar physicochemical properties to petroleum-based oleo-chemicals. It has been shown that wild-type ‘TesA had better selectivity for long-chain acyl substrates (≥C16), while the two mutants ‘TesA^E142D/Y145G and ‘TesA^{M141L/E142D/Y145G} had better selectivity for medium-chain acyl substrates. However, it is difficult to obtain the selectivity mechanism of substrates for proteins by traditional experimental methods. In this study, in order to obtain more MCFAs, we analyzed the binding mode of proteins (‘TesA, ‘TesA^E142D/Y145G and ‘TesA^{M141L/E142D/Y145G}) and substrates (C16/C8-N-acetylcysteamine analogs, C16/C8-SNAC), the key residues and catalytic mechanisms through molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and the molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA). The results showed that several main residues related to catalysis, including Ser10, Asn73 and His157, had a strong hydrogen bond interaction with the substrates. The mutant region (Met141-Tyr146) and loop_107–113 were mainly dominated by Van der Waals contributions to the substrates. For C16-SNAC, except for ‘TesA^{M141L/E142D/Y145G} with large conformational changes, there were strong interactions at both head and tail ends that distorted the substrate into a more favorable high-energy conformation for the catalytic reaction. For C8-SNAC, the head and tail found it difficult to bind to the enzyme at the same time due to insufficient chain length, which made the substrate binding sites more variable, so ‘TesA^{M141L/E142D/Y145G} with better binding sites had the strongest activity, and ‘TesA had the weakest activity, conversely. In short, the matching substrate chain and binding pocket length are the key factors affecting selectivity. This will be helpful for the further improvement of thioesterases.