Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz has a total of 407 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Erik S. Knudsen
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
154 shared publications - Jianxin Wang
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
54 shared publications - Thomas N. O'COnnor
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
45 shared publications - Sidney Mahan
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center 9 Buffalo, NY
30 shared publications - Vishnu Kumarasamy
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
30 shared publications - Ana Paula Delgado
Graduate Program in Genetics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York. 3
27 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 28 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Research
- p. OF1-OF20
Targeting Distinct Cell-Cycle Nodes Overcomes RAS Inhibitor Resistance
Activating mutations in KRAS drive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although mutant-selective KRAS inhibitors and pan-RAS inhibitors provide clinical benefits, the development of resistance limits durable responses. In this study, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed that, despite effective suppression of mutant KRAS signaling, resistant cells sustain cell-cycle progression. Distinct orthogonal mitogenic pathways were engaged in a context-dependent manner to bypass KRAS inhibition. Although these pathways could be broadly inhibited using the pan–RAS-ON inhibitor RMC-6236, cells remained capable of developing acquired resistance, in which cell proliferation was uncoupled from RAS signaling. Combinatorial drug screens and genome-wide CRISPR–Cas9 screens showed that perturbing cell-cycle nodes via targeting cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4/6 and CDK2 restored sensitivity to KRAS/RAS inhibitors. Cotargeting CDK4/6 induced G1 arrest and suppressed E2F-regulated proteins across all resistant models. In contrast, cotargeting CDK2 exerted a broader effect by impairing DNA replication, inducing G2 arrest, preventing mitotic entry, and yielding a more durable cytostatic response that delayed cellular outgrowth after drug withdrawal. Finally, concurrent inhibition of KRAS with either CDK4/6 or CDK2 yielded durable tumor control in vivo in xenografts derived from models with acquired resistance. In conclusion, these findings identify sustained cell-cycle activity as a defining feature of resistance to KRAS-directed therapies and establish cell-cycle cotargeting as an effective strategy to overcome KRAS/RAS inhibitor resistance. Significance: Acquired resistance to KRAS/RAS inhibitors limits clinical benefit. We identify active cell cycle machinery as a defining feature of resistance and demonstrate distinct combinatorial strategies to target cell cycle progression.
- 28 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Research
- p. OF1-OF20
Targeting Distinct Cell-Cycle Nodes Overcomes RAS Inhibitor Resistance
Activating mutations in KRAS drive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although mutant-selective KRAS inhibitors and pan-RAS inhibitors provide clinical benefits, the development of resistance limits durable responses. In this study, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed that, despite effective suppression of mutant KRAS signaling, resistant cells sustain cell-cycle progression. Distinct orthogonal mitogenic pathways were engaged in a context-dependent manner to bypass KRAS inhibition. Although these pathways could be broadly inhibited using the pan–RAS-ON inhibitor RMC-6236, cells remained capable of developing acquired resistance, in which cell proliferation was uncoupled from RAS signaling. Combinatorial drug screens and genome-wide CRISPR–Cas9 screens showed that perturbing cell-cycle nodes via targeting cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4/6 and CDK2 restored sensitivity to KRAS/RAS inhibitors. Cotargeting CDK4/6 induced G1 arrest and suppressed E2F-regulated proteins across all resistant models. In contrast, cotargeting CDK2 exerted a broader effect by impairing DNA replication, inducing G2 arrest, preventing mitotic entry, and yielding a more durable cytostatic response that delayed cellular outgrowth after drug withdrawal. Finally, concurrent inhibition of KRAS with either CDK4/6 or CDK2 yielded durable tumor control in vivo in xenografts derived from models with acquired resistance. In conclusion, these findings identify sustained cell-cycle activity as a defining feature of resistance to KRAS-directed therapies and establish cell-cycle cotargeting as an effective strategy to overcome KRAS/RAS inhibitor resistance. Significance: Acquired resistance to KRAS/RAS inhibitors limits clinical benefit. We identify active cell cycle machinery as a defining feature of resistance and demonstrate distinct combinatorial strategies to target cell cycle progression.
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S3 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
RB-independent activity of CDK2 inhibition in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant models
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S3 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
RB-independent activity of CDK2 inhibition in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant models
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Quantitative imaging analysis of tumor biopsies
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Quantitative imaging analysis of tumor biopsies
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S2 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
CDK2 inhibition does not activate RB
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S2 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
CDK2 inhibition does not activate RB
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S5 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Phosphoproteomic analysis after CDK2 inhibitor treatment
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S5 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Phosphoproteomic analysis after CDK2 inhibitor treatment
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S6 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
On-target and p53-dependent activity of CDK2 inhibition
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S6 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
On-target and p53-dependent activity of CDK2 inhibition
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S4 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Efficacy of CDK2 inhibition in patient-derived CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant cell lines
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S4 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Efficacy of CDK2 inhibition in patient-derived CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant cell lines
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S3 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Gene amplification profile of the MGH321.4 model
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S3 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Gene amplification profile of the MGH321.4 model
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S1 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Genomic alterations in models with acquired resistance to CDK4/6i
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S1 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Genomic alterations in models with acquired resistance to CDK4/6i
- Open Access
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S2 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Expression of cell cycle genes in paired CDK4/6i-sensitive and -resistant models
- 2 October 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S2 from CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor–Resistant HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer
Expression of cell cycle genes in paired CDK4/6i-sensitive and -resistant models