Changlong Zhou
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Changlong Zhou has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hongmei Cui
Institute of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
3 shared publications - Xiaxia Niu
Institute of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
3 shared publications - Xinsheng Gu
College of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China
3 shared publications Ting Wu
Institute of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
2 shared publicationsChengyun Li
Institute of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
1 shared publication- Gege Li
Institute of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Combination of Paclitaxel and PXR Antagonist SPA70 Reverses Paclitaxel-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Paclitaxel (PTX) is one of the most efficient drugs for late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, most patients gradually develop resistance to PTX with long-term treatments. The identification of new strategies to reverse PTX resistance in NSCLC is crucially important for the treatment. PTX is an agonist for the pregnane X receptor (PXR) which regulates PTX metabolism. Antagonizing PXR, therefore, may render the NSCLC more sensitive to the PTX treatment. In this study, we investigated the PXR antagonist SPA70 and its role in PTX treatment of NSCLC. In vitro, SPA70 and PTX synergistically inhibited cell growth, migration and invasion in both paclitaxel-sensitive and paclitaxel-resistant A549 and H460 lung cancer cells. Mechanistically, we found PTX and SPA70 cotreatment disassociated PXR from ABCB1 (MDR1, P-gp) promoter, thus inhibiting P-gp expression. Furthermore, the combination regimen synergistically enhanced the interaction between PXR and Tip60, which abrogated Tip60-mediated α-tubulin acetylation, leading to mitosis defect, S-phase arrest and necroptosis/apoptosis. Combination of PXT and SPA70 dramatically inhibited tumor growth in a paclitaxel-resistant A549/TR xenograft tumor model. Taken together, we showed that SPA70 reduced the paclitaxel resistance of NSCLC. The combination regimen of PTX and SPA70 could be potential novel candidates for the treatment of taxane-resistant lung cancer.
Open AccessCombination of Paclitaxel and PXR Antagonist SPA70 Reverses Paclitaxel-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Paclitaxel (PTX) is one of the most efficient drugs for late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, most patients gradually develop resistance to PTX with long-term treatments. The identification of new strategies to reverse PTX resistance in NSCLC is crucially important for the treatment. PTX is an agonist for the pregnane X receptor (PXR) which regulates PTX metabolism. Antagonizing PXR, therefore, may render the NSCLC more sensitive to the PTX treatment. In this study, we investigated the PXR antagonist SPA70 and its role in PTX treatment of NSCLC. In vitro, SPA70 and PTX synergistically inhibited cell growth, migration and invasion in both paclitaxel-sensitive and paclitaxel-resistant A549 and H460 lung cancer cells. Mechanistically, we found PTX and SPA70 cotreatment disassociated PXR from ABCB1 (MDR1, P-gp) promoter, thus inhibiting P-gp expression. Furthermore, the combination regimen synergistically enhanced the interaction between PXR and Tip60, which abrogated Tip60-mediated α-tubulin acetylation, leading to mitosis defect, S-phase arrest and necroptosis/apoptosis. Combination of PXT and SPA70 dramatically inhibited tumor growth in a paclitaxel-resistant A549/TR xenograft tumor model. Taken together, we showed that SPA70 reduced the paclitaxel resistance of NSCLC. The combination regimen of PTX and SPA70 could be potential novel candidates for the treatment of taxane-resistant lung cancer.
- 1 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Cell Biology and Toxicology
- Vol. 39 (5) , 2381-2399
Inhibition of USP14 enhances anti-tumor effect in vemurafenib-resistant melanoma by regulation of Skp2
Background The mutation of BRAF V600E often occurred in melanoma and results in tumorigenesis. BRAF mutation drives hyperactivation of the RAF-MAPK-ERK pathway. The acquired drug resistance upon prolonged use of BRAF inhibitors (such as vemurafenib) still remains the main obstacle. Previously, we have found that E3 ligase Skp2 over-expresses vemurafenib-resistant melanoma cells, and knockdown of Skp2 enhances the anti-tumor effect of vemurafenib. Interestingly, the literature has reported that the selective USP14/UCHL5 inhibitor b-AP15 displays great potential in melanoma therapy; however, the molecular mechanism still remains unknown. Methods In vitro, the effect of the combination regimen of vemurafenib (Vem, PLX4032) and b-AP15 on vem-sensitive and vem-resistant melanoma has been investigated by wound healing, colony formation, transwell invasion assay, flow cytometry, lysosome staining, and ROS detection. In vivo, the combination effect on vem-resistant melanoma has been evaluated with a nude mice xenograft tumor model. GST-pulldown and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays have been applied to investigate the interactions between USP14, UCHL5, and Skp2. Cycloheximide (CHX) assay and ubiquitination assays have been used to explore the effect of USP14 on Skp2 protein half-life and ubiquitination status. Results In the present study, we have revealed that repression of USP14 sensitizes vemurafenib resistance in melanoma through a previously unappreciated mechanism that USP14 but not UCHL5 stabilizes Skp2, blocking its ubiquitination. K119 on Skp2 is required for USP14-mediated deubiquitination and stabilization of Skp2. Furthermore, the mutated catalytic activity amino acid cysteine (C) 114 on USP14 abrogates stabilization of Skp2. Stabilization of Skp2 is required for USP14 to negatively regulate autophagy. The combination regimen of Skp2 inhibitor vemurafenib and USP14/UCHL5 inhibitor b-AP15 dramatically inhibits cell viability, migration, invasion, and colony formation in vemurafenib-sensitive and vemurafenib-resistant melanoma. Vemurafenib and b-AP15 hold cells in the S phase thus leading to apoptosis as well as the formation of the autophagic vacuole in vemurafenib-resistant SKMEL28 cells. The enhanced proliferation effect of USP14 and Skp2 is mainly due to a more effective reduction of cell apoptosis and autophagy. Further evaluation of various protein alterations has revealed that the increased expression of cleaved-PARP, LC3, and decreased Ki67 are more obvious in the combination of vemurafenib and b-AP15 treatment than those in single-drug treatment. Moreover, the co-treatment of vemurafenib and b-AP15 dramatically inhibits the growth of vemurafenib-resistant melanoma xenograft in vivo. Collectively, our findings have demonstrated that the combination of Skp2 inhibitor and USP14 inhibitor provides a new solution for the treatment of BRAF inhibitor resistance melanoma.
- 1 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Cell Biology and Toxicology
- Vol. 39 (5) , 2381-2399
Inhibition of USP14 enhances anti-tumor effect in vemurafenib-resistant melanoma by regulation of Skp2
Background The mutation of BRAF V600E often occurred in melanoma and results in tumorigenesis. BRAF mutation drives hyperactivation of the RAF-MAPK-ERK pathway. The acquired drug resistance upon prolonged use of BRAF inhibitors (such as vemurafenib) still remains the main obstacle. Previously, we have found that E3 ligase Skp2 over-expresses vemurafenib-resistant melanoma cells, and knockdown of Skp2 enhances the anti-tumor effect of vemurafenib. Interestingly, the literature has reported that the selective USP14/UCHL5 inhibitor b-AP15 displays great potential in melanoma therapy; however, the molecular mechanism still remains unknown. Methods In vitro, the effect of the combination regimen of vemurafenib (Vem, PLX4032) and b-AP15 on vem-sensitive and vem-resistant melanoma has been investigated by wound healing, colony formation, transwell invasion assay, flow cytometry, lysosome staining, and ROS detection. In vivo, the combination effect on vem-resistant melanoma has been evaluated with a nude mice xenograft tumor model. GST-pulldown and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays have been applied to investigate the interactions between USP14, UCHL5, and Skp2. Cycloheximide (CHX) assay and ubiquitination assays have been used to explore the effect of USP14 on Skp2 protein half-life and ubiquitination status. Results In the present study, we have revealed that repression of USP14 sensitizes vemurafenib resistance in melanoma through a previously unappreciated mechanism that USP14 but not UCHL5 stabilizes Skp2, blocking its ubiquitination. K119 on Skp2 is required for USP14-mediated deubiquitination and stabilization of Skp2. Furthermore, the mutated catalytic activity amino acid cysteine (C) 114 on USP14 abrogates stabilization of Skp2. Stabilization of Skp2 is required for USP14 to negatively regulate autophagy. The combination regimen of Skp2 inhibitor vemurafenib and USP14/UCHL5 inhibitor b-AP15 dramatically inhibits cell viability, migration, invasion, and colony formation in vemurafenib-sensitive and vemurafenib-resistant melanoma. Vemurafenib and b-AP15 hold cells in the S phase thus leading to apoptosis as well as the formation of the autophagic vacuole in vemurafenib-resistant SKMEL28 cells. The enhanced proliferation effect of USP14 and Skp2 is mainly due to a more effective reduction of cell apoptosis and autophagy. Further evaluation of various protein alterations has revealed that the increased expression of cleaved-PARP, LC3, and decreased Ki67 are more obvious in the combination of vemurafenib and b-AP15 treatment than those in single-drug treatment. Moreover, the co-treatment of vemurafenib and b-AP15 dramatically inhibits the growth of vemurafenib-resistant melanoma xenograft in vivo. Collectively, our findings have demonstrated that the combination of Skp2 inhibitor and USP14 inhibitor provides a new solution for the treatment of BRAF inhibitor resistance melanoma.
- Open Access
- 16 March 2022
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Oncology
- Vol. 12, 837980
Nuclear Receptor PXR Confers Irradiation Resistance by Promoting DNA Damage Response Through Stabilization of ATF3
Low response rate to radiotherapy remains a problem for liver and colorectal cancer patients due to inappropriate DNA damage response in tumors. Here, we report that pregnane X receptor (PXR) contributes to irradiation (IR) resistance by promoting activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3)-mediated ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated protein (ATM) activation. PXR stabilized ATF3 protein by blocking its ubiquitination. PXR–ATF3 interaction is required for regulating ATF3, as one mutant of lysine (K) 42R of ATF3 lost binding with PXR and abolished PXR-reduced ubiquitination of ATF3. On the other hand, threonine (T) 432A of PXR lost binding with ATF3 and further compromised ATM activation. Moreover, the PXR–ATF3 interaction increases ATF3 stabilization through disrupting ATF3–murine double minute 2 (MDM2) interaction and negatively regulating MDM2 protein expression. PXR enhanced MDM2 auto-ubiquitination and shortened its half-life, therefore compromising the MDM2-mediated degradation of ATF3 protein. Structurally, both ATF3 and PXR bind to the RING domain of MDM2, and on the other hand, MDM2 binds with PXR on the DNA-binding domain (DBD), which contains zinc finger sequence. Zinc finger sequence is well known for nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) playing E3 ligase activity to degrade nuclear factor κB (NFκB)/p65. However, whether zinc-RING sequence grants E3 ligase activity to PXR remains elusive. Taken together, these results provide a novel mechanism that PXR contributes to IR resistance by promoting ATF3-mediated ATM activation through stabilization of ATF3. Our result suggests that targeting PXR may sensitize liver and colon cancer cells to IR therapy.
- 16 March 2022
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Oncology
- Vol. 12, 837980
Open AccessNuclear Receptor PXR Confers Irradiation Resistance by Promoting DNA Damage Response Through Stabilization of ATF3
Low response rate to radiotherapy remains a problem for liver and colorectal cancer patients due to inappropriate DNA damage response in tumors. Here, we report that pregnane X receptor (PXR) contributes to irradiation (IR) resistance by promoting activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3)-mediated ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated protein (ATM) activation. PXR stabilized ATF3 protein by blocking its ubiquitination. PXR–ATF3 interaction is required for regulating ATF3, as one mutant of lysine (K) 42R of ATF3 lost binding with PXR and abolished PXR-reduced ubiquitination of ATF3. On the other hand, threonine (T) 432A of PXR lost binding with ATF3 and further compromised ATM activation. Moreover, the PXR–ATF3 interaction increases ATF3 stabilization through disrupting ATF3–murine double minute 2 (MDM2) interaction and negatively regulating MDM2 protein expression. PXR enhanced MDM2 auto-ubiquitination and shortened its half-life, therefore compromising the MDM2-mediated degradation of ATF3 protein. Structurally, both ATF3 and PXR bind to the RING domain of MDM2, and on the other hand, MDM2 binds with PXR on the DNA-binding domain (DBD), which contains zinc finger sequence. Zinc finger sequence is well known for nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) playing E3 ligase activity to degrade nuclear factor κB (NFκB)/p65. However, whether zinc-RING sequence grants E3 ligase activity to PXR remains elusive. Taken together, these results provide a novel mechanism that PXR contributes to IR resistance by promoting ATF3-mediated ATM activation through stabilization of ATF3. Our result suggests that targeting PXR may sensitize liver and colon cancer cells to IR therapy.