Lorenzo Cifarelli

Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility of SIMPLE (Single field Image Multi Parameters defined Lesions Extent), a new Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) classification for screening of 45° single field fundus pictures of patients with diabetes (PwDM), assessing DR, Diabetic Maculopathy (DMac) and referral rate agreement and comparing it to current Italian Guidelines (IG). Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, multicentre study, collecting 1000 retinal 45° single field images of PwDM obtained during routine visits in two diabetes clinics. Three ophthalmologists evaluated each image, determining the presence and number of specific DR lesions and then assigning a stage according to the current IG for screening. SIMPLE staging was performed automatically via Excel software, based on the pre-specified DR characteristics observed by the graders. We analysed intra-centre, inter-centre and total inter-grader agreement for DR and DMac stage and referral rate of the two classifications. Results: Agreement amongst the three graders was consistently higher when using SIMPLE classification than when using current IG classification. For DR, kappa (k) was 0.86 with IG and 0.95 with SIMPLE classification; for DMac, k-IG was 0.78, while k-SIMPLE was 0.96; concordance on the referral rate was 0.91 with IG and 0.99 with SIMPLE. Similar results were obtained in sub-analyses for the evaluation of intra-centre and inter-centre concordance. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the new SIMPLE classification has an excellent reproducibility amongst graders, comparable or superior to the current IG for DR screening proposed in 2015, improving the standardisation of the decision on referability.

Background: The aim of this research was to see if a refractive enhanced monofocal IOL (Eyhance IOL, IOL Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA, USA) can provide better intermediate vision in patients undergoing phaco-vitrectomy due to cataract and epiretinal macular membrane (ERM). Methods: A nonrandomized prospective observational comparative study enrolled patients affected by cataract and ERM undergoing phaco-vitrectomy. A follow up of 6 months was established. Corrected and uncorrected visual acuity of both monocular and binocular types were assessed regarding intermediate and far distances. The CATQUEST 9-SF questionnaire was administered preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Results: Twenty-three eyes of twenty-three patients were enrolled, with 11 in the enhanced monofocal group. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity after 6 months was not statistically different. Both monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity after 6 months were higher in the enhanced monofocal group (p < 0.001). The corrected intermediate visual acuity after 6 months was higher in the enhanced monofocal group (p = 0.01). The CATQUEST-9SF questionnaire showed significant differences in the variation between the preoperative condition and six-month postoperative results (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This refractive enhanced monofocal IOL can provide better intermediate vision compared to a standard monofocal IOL in patients undergoing phaco-vitrectomy due to cataracts and ERM. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results.