Cristina Raluca Iorga

Background: There is an increasing number of synchronous tumor diagnoses, mainly due to new investigative techniques and diagnostic guidelines. While renal and colonic malignancies are common, synchronous cases remain rare. They are usually diagnosed during the staging work-up performed for the primary cancer. Case Presentation: We share our experience with two cases of synchronous colon adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. The surgical intervention was performed simultaneously and laparoscopically, with good results and prognosis. Reviewing the literature, we found few studies reporting these synchronous tumors, which reflects their low incidence. Renal tumors are often identified during imaging studies performed for staging colonic tumors, and performing surgical treatment during the same operation is widely accepted. We performed a search of the literature to identify similar cases and to look for associations that can lead to synchronous colonic and renal malignancies. We also wanted to highlight the potential for therapeutic management as a single step, thereby avoiding a second surgical procedure. Conclusions: Synchronous renal and colonic malignancies are rare and are generally sporadic. Due to their rarity, there are no established guidelines, and management can be challenging. Presently, the treatment needs to be individualized based on discussions from the tumor board.

Background and Clinical Significance: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a critical medical emergency, with upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurring approximately five times more frequently than lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). The incidence of LGIB tends to increase with age, likely due to a greater prevalence of vascular and diverticular diseases among older patients. However, there are rare or extremely rare causes of LGIB that demand significant diagnostic and therapeutic efforts, some of which may pose unexpected challenges during surgery. Case report: We present the case of a 75-year-old woman, previously treated for a cecal neoplasm 15 years ago, who was hospitalized due to intermittent lower gastrointestinal bleeding over the past three months. Initially, the patient declined a colonoscopic examination, and the bleeding stopped spontaneously. She was then discharged at her own request in stable condition. However, she returned with a recurrence of the bleeding. While preparing for a colonoscopy, she experienced subocclusive symptoms, abdominal distension, and vomiting. During emergency surgery, a floating coprolith, which was attached to one of the anastomosis sutures, was sensed through palpation and later confirmed via colotomy. The coprolith was removed, and hemostasis was achieved in situ, leading to a favorable postoperative recovery and normalization of intestinal transit. A literature review identified 24 articles that met the eligibility criteria concerning rare causes of LGIB. Appendiceal bleeding (due to erosions, arteriovenous malformations, or endometriosis) was the most common cause, whereas the rarest causes included jejunal hemangiomas and rectal ulcers resulting from mucormycosis. Diagnosing these conditions is often challenging, typically requiring CT scans, colonoscopy, and angiography, with surgical treatment being the primary method to ensure hemostasis. In conclusion, the diagnosis and management of LGIB present significant challenges for clinicians, and successful outcomes are usually achieved through a collaborative multidisciplinary team approach.

Background. Peritoneal dialysis is a form of kidney function replacement that is not as widespread as hemodialysis. However, it has recognized advantages, such as preservation of residual renal function, lack of vascular access, and the ability to be performed at home. On the other hand, it requires the correct insertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter and maintaining its patency. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis between January 2016 and December 2022. The study analyzed the frequency and type of complications registered within three months, in order to validate laparoscopy as a safe method of catheter insertion (with reduced periprocedural complications), as well as the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the care of patients with peritoneal dialysis. Results. In about 14% of patients, we encountered a total of 23 complications: 61% in the first month, 34.7% in the second month, and 4.3% in the third month. The most frequent complication was infection (peritonitis 35%, catheter exit site infection 30.4%), followed by peri-catheter leak (21.7% of total complications). Catheter migration, hernia, and significant bleeding were rare events (4.3% of total complications each). All complications were managed by medical treatment, except two cases which required replacement of the catheter. Conclusions. Laparoscopic catheter insertion is a safe procedure with low post-procedural complications in patients who are dependent on peritoneal dialysis.

The incidence of breast and colorectal cancers is well established in studies, but the synchronous occurrence of the two types of tumors is a rarity. In general, they are discovered during screening investigations following the diagnosis of an initial tumor. Objective: Our aim is to describe the main diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for synchronous breast and colorectal tumors. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature for cases or case series, using established keywords (synchronous breast and colon tumor and synonyms) for the period of 1970–2023. Five reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. The results were processed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results: A total of 15 cases were included in the study, including 2 males (age 50 and 57) and 13 females (median age 60, with range from 40 to 79). In a vast majority of the cases, the diagnosis of synchronous tumor was prompted by the first tumor’s workup. The first diagnosed tumor was colorectal in nine cases and a breast tumor in six cases. The most common histopathological type of breast tumor was invasive ductal carcinoma, and the colon tumors were exclusively adenocarcinomas. All cases had a surgical indication for both breast and colorectal tumor, except one case, in which the breast tumor had multiple metastasis. In four cases, the surgery was performed concomitantly (colectomy and mastectomy). In three cases, surgery was initially carried out for the breast tumor, followed by colon surgery. Oncological treatment was indicated depending on the tumor stage. Conclusions: For the treatment of synchronous tumors, the Tumor Board (T.B) decision is mandatory and must be personalized for each patient. Developing new methods of treatment and investigation may play an important role in the future for understanding synchronous tumor development, incidence, and outcome.

Background/Objectives: The success of peritoneal dialysis is highly dependent on the integrity of the abdominal wall. Therefore, routine examination and treatment of abdominal hernias can prevent peritoneal dialysis (PD) failure, discontinuation, and conversion to hemodialysis. In this present study, we present our examination protocol for patients proposed for PD and our attitude in treating parietal defects in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Objectives: highlight whether PD is a risk factor for the occurrence of ventral hernias, the relationship between associated pathologies and the occurrence of hernias and the need for an HD switch in the postoperative period. Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2022, a group of 133 patients proposed for insertion of a PD catheter were evaluated according to the protocol established by our hospital. Routine examination for the diagnosis of abdominal hernias and repair before starting the DP is part of the procedure. We included patients with a 3 year minimum follow-up after insertion and evaluated the incidence of parietal defects that appeared during PD treatment. Results: Nine patients were diagnosed and operated on for abdominal hernia before starting peritoneal dialysis and none of them had a recurrence of hernia during PD. Twelve patients were diagnosed with abdominal hernias during dialysis treatment (9% incidence) and the median length of time at which parietal defects occur during PD is 12.5 months [range 2–48]. Median BMI is 27.12 [range 22.3–31.24], with a female–male ratio of 2:1 Five patients were transferred to HD, three permanently and two patients temporarily. No patient abandoned PD treatment due to the presence of an abdominal parietal defect. Conclusions: Diagnosis of ventral hernias prior to the time of catheterization for PD leads to a decrease in the incidence of parietal defects during PD and is mandatory in patients who are candidates for PD. Open alloplastic surgical procedures are safe procedures with a low recurrence rate in PD patients. The postoperative continuation of PD is feasible but the decision is to be made by the multidisciplinary team and individualized for each patient.

The COVID-19 pandemic struck unexpectedly; emergency services and chronic care institutions, including dialysis centers, were overloaded. A significant problem was the care of COVID-positive patients alongside the care of chronically dialyzed patients who presented emergencies. In our hospital, which became a COVID support center for dialysis patients with severe forms of the disease, we had to care for PD patients with dialysis-related emergencies. We present two cases of patients managed on an outpatient basis or 1-day hospitalization who were treated successfully without compromising the quality of the care provided. We used remote monitoring, worked in a multidisciplinary team, and shortened the duration of the patients’ hospitalization (and implicitly the risk of contact). In pandemic conditions, the advantage of PD was the possibility of patient isolation; in the first 6 months of the pandemic, we recorded no deaths in this category of patients. In hemodialysis patients, infection and mortality rates were high. Although we expected an increase in the number of peritoneal dialysis patients in the post-pandemic period, this did not happen. We continue to plead for the popularization of the PD method among patients and doctors, which has proven advantages in pandemic conditions.

The COVID-19 pandemic struck unexpectedly, emergency services and chronic care institutions, including dialysis centers, were overloaded. An important problem was the care of positive COVID patients, but also the care of chronically dialyzed patients who presented emergencies. In our Hospital, which has become a COVID support for dialysis patients with severe forms of the disease, we had to care for PD patients with dialysis-related emergencies. We presented 2 cases of patients managed on an outpatient basis or 1 day hospitalization, treated successfully and without compromising the quality of the care provided. We used remote monitoring, we worked in a multidiscipli-nary team, we shortened the hospitalization of patients (and implicitly the risk of contact). In pandemic conditions, the advantage of PD was represented by the possibility of patient isolation, so that in the first 6 months of the pandemic, we recorded no deaths in this category of patients. In case of hemodialysis patients, in-fection and mortality rates were high. Although we expected an increase in the number of peritoneal dialysis patients in the post-pandemic period, this did not happen. We continue to plead for the popularization of the PD method among patients and doctors, which has proven its advantages under the conditions of the pandemic.

Background/Objectives: Peritoneal dialysis as a form of renal function sub-stitution is not as widespread as hemodialysis. However, it has recognized advantages such as preservation of the residual renal func-tion, no need for vascular access , can be performed at home, but requires a proper in-sertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter and maintaining its patency. Methods: We presented a 10-year retrospective study on a group of 133 patients hos-pitalized for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion/replacement. We routinely implant the catheter laparoscopically, but there were cases in which the insertion was performed open route. We analyzed the patient group by age and gender criteria, number of complications and time when they appeared, duration of surgical intervention and the surgical technique used (126 were performed laparoscopically and 7 were inserted via open route). The open technique was performed mainly in patients with contraindications of general anesthesia. Results: We encountered a number of 23 complications in 18 patients, in only 1 case the patient was switched to permanent hemodialysis (at his own wish). We highlighted in the study the indisputable advantages of laparoscopy, supported by the results obtained: correct placement of the catheter, the possibility of adhesiolysis, preservation of the peritoneal surface through minor op-erative trauma, low number of complications(bleeding, migration, hernia 0,8%, leakage 4%, lower than those found in the literature). Even if infection was the most frequent complication (peritonitis 35%, catheter exit site infection 30.4%), only 1 case appered in the pretraining period. All complications were managed by medical treatment or by temporary cessation of peritoneal lavage, except of two cases that required reimplantation of the catheter. Conclusions: Laparoscopic catheter insertion for PD is a safe method, with reduced post-procedural complications, thus ensuring a long duration of the functionality of the catheter.

Background: Peritoneal sclerosis (PS) and its most severe form, encapsulating PS (EPS), are rare entities that can occur in various procedures (liver transplantation, intraperitoneal chemotherapy) or secondary to medications (beta-blockers); however, PS or EPS typically occur in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis as a form of renal function substitution. Medical or surgical treatments can be applied, but morbidity and mortality have high rates. This condition typically presents clinically as an intestinal obstruction caused by the inclusion of the intestinal loops in the peritoneal fibrous membrane. Methods: Herein, we present data from a single tertiary surgery center that has dedicated teams for patients receiving dialysis. Over 12 years, we analyzed a group of 63 patients admitted for catheter replacement/removal or for acute surgical pathology. In five cases (7.9%), we diagnosed EPS. Two patients with EPS presented with atypical abdominal pathologies requiring emergency surgery: one case of hemoperitoneum caused by a ruptured ovarian cyst and one case of uterine fibroids and metrorrhagia. Results: The definitive diagnoses were established intraoperatively and by analyzing the morpho-pathological changes in the peritoneum. The possible intraoperative challenges included laborious dissection, difficulties in restoring the correct anatomical landmarks, an increased duration of the surgical intervention and a high rate of incidents and accidents. Conclusions: The aim of the present study was to emphasize the possibility of other surgical pathologies overlapping with EPS, increasing the complexity of the surgical intervention.

Background: Peritoneal sclerosis (PS) and its most severe form, encapsulating PS (EPS), are rare entities that can occur in various procedures (liver transplantation, intraperitoneal chemotherapy), secondary to medications ( beta-blockers); however, PS or EPS typically occur in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis as a form of renal function substitution. Medical or surgical treatments can be applied, but morbidity and mortality have high rates . This condition typically presents clinically as an intestinal obstruction caused by the inclusion of the intestinal loops in the peritoneal fibrous membrane. Methods: Herein we present data from a single tertiary surgery center that has dedicated teams for patients receiving dialysis. In 12 years we analyzed a group of 63 patients admitted for catheter replacement/removal or for acute surgical pathology. In 5 cases (7,9%) we diagnosed EPS . Two patients with EPS presented with atypical abdominal pathologies requiring emergency surgery: one case of hemoperitoneum caused by a ruptured ovarian cyst and one case of uterine fibroids and metrorrhagia. Results: The definitive diagnoses were established intraoperatively and by analyzing the morpho-pathological changes of the peritoneum. The possible intraoperative challenges included laborious dissection, difficulties in restoring the correct anatomical landmarks, increased duration of the surgical intervention and a high rate of incidents and accidents Conclusions: The aim of the present study was to emphasize the possibility of other surgical pathologies overlapping with EPS, increasing the complexity of the surgical intervention. Also, we sought to determine whether there is a correlation between the morpho-pathological results of these patients who underwent emergency surgery and the common EPS morpho-pathological changes.