Shlomit Zorani
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Shlomit Zorani has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Einat Peles
School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
3 shared publications- Olga Kreichman
School of Optometry and Vision Science, Bar-Ilan University 1 , Ramat Gan, Israel
1 shared publication - Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
School of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Life Science, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 March 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Imperfect Size Invariance in Face Discrimination
Multiple findings suggest that human visual perception exhibits extensive size invariance (i.e., insensitivity to retinal image size changes) for multiple object categories. This is often investigated when retinal image size changes following real-world image size changes, but viewing distance is kept constant, a situation that does not reflect daily vision where objects retain their real-world size and their image size on the retina changes as a function of viewing distance. Here, we measured face discrimination performance to parametrically growing face differences and assessed size invariance by examining whether performance was sensitive to retinal image size changes employing multiple methods (e.g., human performance deviation from that of the ideal observer). Importantly, retinal image size changes were applied either naturalistically (when faces kept their world size but were more distant) or lab-like (where faces changed their world size while viewing distance was constant). We found that (i) the difference detection threshold (DT) was not influenced by retinal size changes or viewing distances we manipulated, (ii) face discrimination was significantly worse for smaller retinal image sizes (for both naturalistic and for lab-like conditions), (iii) worse face discrimination performance at smaller retinal image sizes were significantly associated between naturalistic and lab-like conditions. Our results indicate that face discrimination shows imperfect invariance to retinal size and, importantly, this appears independent of viewing distance. Since face perception may rely on face-specific mechanisms, future work should examine whether these results generalize to additional object categories.
- 13 March 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Open AccessImperfect Size Invariance in Face Discrimination
Multiple findings suggest that human visual perception exhibits extensive size invariance (i.e., insensitivity to retinal image size changes) for multiple object categories. This is often investigated when retinal image size changes following real-world image size changes, but viewing distance is kept constant, a situation that does not reflect daily vision where objects retain their real-world size and their image size on the retina changes as a function of viewing distance. Here, we measured face discrimination performance to parametrically growing face differences and assessed size invariance by examining whether performance was sensitive to retinal image size changes employing multiple methods (e.g., human performance deviation from that of the ideal observer). Importantly, retinal image size changes were applied either naturalistically (when faces kept their world size but were more distant) or lab-like (where faces changed their world size while viewing distance was constant). We found that (i) the difference detection threshold (DT) was not influenced by retinal size changes or viewing distances we manipulated, (ii) face discrimination was significantly worse for smaller retinal image sizes (for both naturalistic and for lab-like conditions), (iii) worse face discrimination performance at smaller retinal image sizes were significantly associated between naturalistic and lab-like conditions. Our results indicate that face discrimination shows imperfect invariance to retinal size and, importantly, this appears independent of viewing distance. Since face perception may rely on face-specific mechanisms, future work should examine whether these results generalize to additional object categories.
- 23 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 172, 197
Corrigendum to: “Is pain empathy associated with pain indices and trauma history? A comparison between patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment and healthy controls” [J. Psychiatr. Res. 171 (2024) 286–295 37]
- 23 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 172, 197
Corrigendum to: “Is pain empathy associated with pain indices and trauma history? A comparison between patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment and healthy controls” [J. Psychiatr. Res. 171 (2024) 286–295 37]
- 2 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 171, 286-295
Is pain empathy associated with pain indices and trauma history? A comparison between patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment and healthy controls.
- 2 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 171, 286-295
Is pain empathy associated with pain indices and trauma history? A comparison between patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment and healthy controls.