Shilin Gao

Shilin Gao

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Shilin Gao has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Ana Mendes

    MED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Evora, 7000-083 Evora, Portugal

    1 shared publication
  • Baiyin Baoligao

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China

    1 shared publication
  • Fengran Xu

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China

    1 shared publication
  • Ping Cao

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xiangdong Li

    Qinghai Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydro-Electric Power Design Co., Ltd., Xining 810001, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xiangpeng Mu

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Experimental Study on the Impact of Pulsed Flow Velocity on the Scouring of Benthic Algae from a Mountainous River

    by Ping Cao, Fengran Xu, Shilin Gao, Baiyin Baoligao, Xiangdong Li, Xiangpeng Mu, Ana Mendes, Xu Shang

    The decrease in periodic scouring of pulsed flows in regulated rivers can result in algal communities dominated by filamentous algae, not available as food sources for fish and macroinvertebrates. To study the pulsed flow velocity required to scour benthic algae from natural river beds, the removal effects on the algal biomass and resistances of different species were tested in a laboratory flume at different velocities of 0.8, 1.1, 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0 m/s. The removal of total algal biomass showed a significant positive relationship with increasing velocities, which reached 22% at 2.0 m/s. The biomass removal of green algae and diatoms was higher than that of blue–green algae. The flow velocity at 1.4 m/s had a clear removal effect on filamentous algae. The velocity higher than 1.7 m/s caused a significant increase in the removal percentage of total biomass dominated by diatoms and blue–green algae. To reduce the filamentous algae and retain the diatoms and blue–green algae, a range of near bed flow velocity was suggested to be 1.4–1.7 m/s. This range could serve as a reference for required pulsed flow velocity to reduce the growth of excessive or nuisance periphyton.