Chunxiao Liu

The optical saturation problem is one of the main factors causing uncertainty in aboveground biomass (AGB) estimations using optical remote sensing data. It is critical for the improvement in AGB estimation accuracy to clarify the relationships between environmental factors and the variations in optical saturation values (OSVs). In this study, we obtained the OSVs for 20 districts and clarified the individual, interactive, and comprehensive effects of climate, soil, and topographical factors on the OSV variations. The results are as follows: (1) the range of the OSVs was from 104 t/hm² to 182 t/hm² for the 20 districts; (2) the soil factor had the greatest (−0.635) influence on the OSVs compared to climate and topography; (3) the highest interaction effect (−0.833) was between climate and soil; (4) the comprehensive effect of the three environmental factors on the OSVs was obvious, and the correlation coefficient was 0.436. Moreover, the mean temperature of the coldest quarter (MCQMean) had the highest effect on the OSVs. The results indicate that environmental factors significantly affect the variation in OSVs through their individual, interactive, and comprehensive effects. Our findings provide a valuable reference for reducing the uncertainty caused by spectral saturation in AGB estimations using optical remote sensing data.

To enhance forest carbon sequestration capacity, it is important to optimize forest structure by revealing the spatial effects of the aboveground biomass of individual trees, with particular emphasis on stand origin and tree size. Here, 0.3 ha clear-cut plots of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis forest were selected in a typical plantation and natural stand. Then, the ordinary least squares model and spatial regression models were used to analyze the different responses between spatial position and individual tree biomass based on the stand origin and diameter at breast height (DBH) of the tree. Our study shows the following: (1) The spatial effect produced a stronger response in the natural stand than in the plantation. The amount of change in the adjusted R-squared (Δ_Radj²) of tree component totaled 0.34 and 0.57 for Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis and other trees in the natural stand, compared to only 0.2 and 0.42 in the plantation; (2) Spatial effects had a stronger impact on the accuracy of the fit for the crown (ΔR_adj² = 0.52) compared to the wood and bark (ΔR_adj² = 0.03) in the plantation, and there were no significant differences in the natural stand (ΔR_adj² = 0.42, ΔR_adj² = 0.43); (3) When DBH reached a certain size, the impact of spatial effect for the crown showed a significant change from positive to negative. The sizes of DBH were 19.5 cm, 14 cm and 34.6 cm, 19 cm for branches of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis and other tree species in the plantation and natural stand, and were 20.3 cm and 31.4 cm for the foliage of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis. Differences in stand structure led to varied responses in the biomass of tree components to spatial effects.

Using various biomass factors, such as biomass expansion factor (BEF) and biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), yields different results for estimating forest biomass. Therefore, ensuring compatibility between total biomass and its components when employing different biomass factors is crucial for developing a set of rapid and efficient models for large-scale biomass calculation. In this study, allometric equations were utilized to construct independent models and the proportional values (root-to-shoot ratio (R_ra), crown-to-stem ratio (R_cs), bark-to-wood ratio (R_bw), foliage-to-bark ratio (R_fb), and wood biomass-to-wood volume (ρ)) by using the mean height (H_m) and the mean diameter at breast height (D_g) of 98 Pinus densata plots in Shangri-La, Yunnan province, China. The compatible methods were applied to reveal the compatibility between the total biomass and each component’s biomass. The results showed the following: (1) Both the independent model and compatible model had a higher accuracy. The values were greater than 0.7 overall, but the foliage biomass accuracy was only 0.2. The total biomass and the component biomass showed compatibility. (2) The accuracy of BEF and BCEF exceeded 0.87 and the total error was less than 0.1 for most components. (3) The mean BEF (1.6) was greater than that of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (M = 1.3), and the mean BCEF was smaller than that of the IPCC; the values were 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. The range of BEF (1.4–2.1) and BCEF (0.44–0.89) were all within the range of the IPCC (1.15–3.2, 0.4–1.0). This study provides a more convenient and accurate method for calculating conversion coefficients (BEF and BCEF), especially when only R_cs data is available.

It is essential to analyze the spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity of aboveground biomass (AGB). But it is difficult to accurately describe due to the lack of data in clear-cutting plots. Thus, measuring the AGB directly in a clear-cutting plot can provide a reference for accurately describing the spatial variation. Therefore, a 0.3-hectare clear-cutting sample plot of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis natural forest was selected, and the AGB was calculated by each component. The intra-group variance was quantitatively described in terms of spatial heterogeneity, and the spatial autocorrelation was explored by global and local Moran’s I. The results indicated that (1) there was different spatial heterogeneity for the different trees and organs. The intra-group variance tended to be stable after 20 m for P. kesiya var. langbianensis (PK) and other upper trees (UPs) and after 10 m for the other lower trees (LTs). (2) The spatial autocorrelation of AGB and wood biomass was similar, while the bark biomass and foliage biomass were consistent. PK and other UPs also exhibited strong spatial autocorrelation, with maximum Moran’s I values of 0.1537 and 0.1644, respectively. (3) There was spatial heterogeneity in the different components except for the bark of PK. The lowest spatial heterogeneity was found for LT.

Forest biomass measurement or estimation is critical for forest monitoring at the stand scale, but errors among different estimations in stand investigation are unclear. Thus, the Pinus densata natural forest in Shangri-La City, southwestern China, was selected as the research object to investigate the biomass of 84 plots and 100 samples of P. densata. The stand biomass was calculated using five methods: stand biomass growth with age (SBA), stem biomass combined with the biomass expansion factors (SB+BEF), stand volume combined with biomass conversion and expansion factors (SV+BCEF), individual tree biomass combined with stand diameter structure (IB+SDS), and individual tree biomass combined with stand density (IB+SD). The estimation errors of the five methods were then analyzed. The results showed that the suitable methods for estimating stand biomass are SB+BEF, M+BCEF, and IB+SDS. When using these three methods (SB+BEF, SV+BCEF, and IB+SDS) to estimate the biomass of different components, wood biomass estimation using SB+BEF is unsuitable, and root biomass estimation employing the IB+SDS method was not preferred. The SV+BCEF method was better for biomass estimation. Except for the branches, the mean relative error (MRE) of the other components presented minor errors in the estimation, while MRE was lower than other components in the range from −0.11%–28.93%. The SB+BEF was more appealing for branches biomass estimation, and its MRE is only 0.31% lower than SV+BCEF. The stand biomass strongly correlated with BEF, BCEF, stand structure, stand age, and other factors. Hence, the stand biomass growth model system established in this study effectively predicted the stand biomass dynamics and provided a theoretical basis and practical support for accurately estimating forest biomass growth.