Briga Hynes

There is an increasing public, societal and policy imperative for effective integration of healthcare delivery systems. Central to integration in healthcare is a focus on people-centred health, access, patient empowerment, interprofessional teamwork and collaboration between all healthcare stakeholders – difficult to achieve in current silo-driven bureaucratic health organisations. Therefore, actor-network theory (ANT) offers a theoretical approach to understanding the complexities of healthcare delivery by unpacking the type of actor’s interplay between social elements and immaterial objects, their interactions, interdependencies and power dynamics. The first of its type, this systematic review aims to identify, synthesise, and appraise extant literature on the use and application of ANT in healthcare contexts. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. The authors generated a search strategy utilising 31 Boolean terms, conducting electronic searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, SCOPUS, PubMed, APA PsycINFO, Business Source Complete and Academic Search Complete. The studies obtained were evaluated for inclusion based on their alignment with the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were independently evaluated by the authors, with all data synthesised using a thematic analysis. From an initial 2,533 studies, the systematic review included 103 studies which utilised ANT within a healthcare context. The analysis of the studies identified trends in the application of ANT across healthcare which we categorised into four themes: healthcare delivery systems, technology and data, integrated care, and innovation management. The findings demonstrated variability and fragmentation in the application of ANT, often diverging from its fundamental principles. Decluttering the literature suggests three dimensions for understanding the relationships of actors, unidimensional ANT – based on single actors, bi-dimensional ANT, the relationship between two actors and multi-dimensional ANT, where human and non-human actors interact to impact healthcare outcomes. The limited number of studies on the use of ANT for integrated healthcare research highlights both its importance to the topic and the considerable research gap that must be addressed.

There is an increasing emphasis on educational institutions to measure research impact beyond publications in areas such as research commercialization. Likewise, policymakers are keen to increase the impact of publicly funded research in fostering commercial innovation, spin outs and industry linkages particularly in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) arena. Despite the importance of research commercialization, the frequency, extent, and quality varies significantly across universities This research investigates the challenges of research commercialisation and proposes a range of entrepreneurship training programmes to overcome these challenges. The results highlight the importance of the process applied in developing such programmes and the role of collaboration and cross departmental partnerships as a means of complementing discipline-specific domains to address the needs of groups who fit between domains. Request access from your librarian to read this chapter's full text.

Introduction Patient and public involvement (PPI) has not been used to its full potential when examining the organisational science and management principles side of healthcare. With more and more acknowledgement of the relationship between management tools and patient outcomes, having meaningful engagement with the patient and the public in conducting research with the potential to enhance the patient experience, has never been more important. This study aims to outline the process in identifying members for a PPI for the organisational science and management principles side of healthcare, as well as providing guidelines for the establishment of PPIs in this nascent field. In addition, it aims to produce a charter for the panel, by and with the panel members, ensuring they are involved at every stage of research. Methods and analysis A hybrid of both a priority-setting and partnership approach to PPI will provide guidance on identifying, recruiting and establishing a PPI for research on the organisational science and management principles in healthcare. The panel will consist of approximately 20 members including patients, members of the public and researchers. A World Café approach to panel workshops will be adopted to produce a charter for the group. An assessment of panel engagement will be conducted through analysis of records of the meetings/workshops, as well as one-to-one interviews with all panel members at key points in time. Assessment criteria will be agreed with all members of the PPI panel. Data will be transcribed and managed using NVivo through a thematic analysis. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the evaluation of the PPI has been received from the Kemmy Business School’s Ethics Committee. Papers outlining the process in establishing a PPI in the area of organisational science and management principles of healthcare, and the results of the assessment of the panel’s engagement will be published in journals.