Suniya Sadullah Khan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Suniya Sadullah Khan has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ihtzaz Qamar
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Muhammad Azeem Ahmad
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Muhammad Umer Sohail
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Raees Fida Swati
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Saad Riffat Qureshi
Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 October 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 12 (20) , 10462
Comparison of Optimization Techniques and Objective Functions Using Gas Generator and Staged Combustion LPRE Cycles
This paper compares various optimization techniques and objective functions to obtain optimum rocket engine performances. This research proposes a modular optimization framework that provides an optimum design for Gas Generator (GG) and Staged Combustion (SC) Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines. This process calculates the ideal rocket engine performance by applying seven different optimization techniques: Simulated Annealing (SA), Nelder Mead (NM), Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Pigeon-Inspired Optimization (PIO), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and a novel hybrid GA-PSO technique named GA-Swarm. This new technique combines the superior search capability of GA with the efficient constraint matching capability of PSO. This research also compares objective functions to determine the most suitable function for GG and SC cycle rocket engines. Three single objective functions are used to minimize the Gross Lift-Off Weight and to maximize Specific Impulse and the Thrust-to-Weight ratio. A fourth multiobjective function is used to simultaneously maximize both Specific Impulse and Thrust-to-Weight ratio. This framework is validated against a pump-fed rocket, and results are within 1% of the actual rocket engine mass. The results of this research indicate that PSO and GA-Swarm produce optimum results for all objective functions. Finally, the most suitable objective function to use while comparing these two cycles is the Gross Lift-Off Weight.
- 17 October 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 12 (20) , 10462
Open AccessComparison of Optimization Techniques and Objective Functions Using Gas Generator and Staged Combustion LPRE Cycles
This paper compares various optimization techniques and objective functions to obtain optimum rocket engine performances. This research proposes a modular optimization framework that provides an optimum design for Gas Generator (GG) and Staged Combustion (SC) Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines. This process calculates the ideal rocket engine performance by applying seven different optimization techniques: Simulated Annealing (SA), Nelder Mead (NM), Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Pigeon-Inspired Optimization (PIO), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and a novel hybrid GA-PSO technique named GA-Swarm. This new technique combines the superior search capability of GA with the efficient constraint matching capability of PSO. This research also compares objective functions to determine the most suitable function for GG and SC cycle rocket engines. Three single objective functions are used to minimize the Gross Lift-Off Weight and to maximize Specific Impulse and the Thrust-to-Weight ratio. A fourth multiobjective function is used to simultaneously maximize both Specific Impulse and Thrust-to-Weight ratio. This framework is validated against a pump-fed rocket, and results are within 1% of the actual rocket engine mass. The results of this research indicate that PSO and GA-Swarm produce optimum results for all objective functions. Finally, the most suitable objective function to use while comparing these two cycles is the Gross Lift-Off Weight.