Jyrki Mustonen

Aims: The use of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is associated with improved glycaemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). However, AID systems are more expensive than other treatment modalities for T1DM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long‐term cost‐effectiveness of AID compared to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals with T1DM at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. Materials and Methods: The study included 336 individuals (mean age: 26.7 years, SD: 15.9 years), with a mean duration of diabetes of 16.6 years. Outcomes were projected in the base case of 50 years using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (v10.0). Clinical data were sourced from electronic health records (EHRs), including changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and events of hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis. Costs were expressed in 2023 Euros (EUR). Results: The AID system was associated with an improvement in quality‐adjusted life expectancy of 2.3 quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) compared to CSII plus CGM. These benefits came from the delayed and reduced incidence of diabetes‐related complications. The mean HbA1c improvement was 12.1 ± 11.7 mmol/mol (3.3% ± 3.2%) in the AID group. Direct costs were estimated to be 26 076 EUR higher for AID than for CSII plus CGM, and AID was associated with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 11 184 EUR per QALY gained. Conclusions: Based on the results of this first cost‐effectiveness study conducted in Finland, a willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold of 50 000 EUR per QALY gained suggests that AID is more cost‐effective than CSII plus CGM for the treatment of T1DM in a real‐world setting.

B: ackground and Aims: There has been an evolving trend in the use of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among individuals with type 1 diabetes. Although isCGM is proven to be beneficial in the treatment of individuals with type 1 diabetes, its use leads to increasing device costs. This study aimed to investigate the long-term cost-effectiveness of isCGM. Methods: Long-term clinical outcomes and costs were projected using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (v10.0) based on the observed real-world outcomes of isCGM. The clinical input data for the analysis were sourced from a real-world patient cohort from Eastern Finland, including 877 adult individuals with type 1 diabetes with isCGM (i.e., Freestyle Libre 1 and 2). At the baseline, the patients’ mean age was 48 years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 25.8 years. The mean baseline HbA1c was 8.6%, and the mean 12-month change from baseline in HbA1c was −0.37% after the initiation of isCGM. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed over a lifetime time horizon. A discount rate of 3% was used for the future costs and health outcomes. Results: The projected use of isCGM was associated with improved quality-adjusted life year (QALY) expectancy of 0.84 QALYs after the start of isCGM. The direct lifetime costs were 7861 EUR higher with the use of isCGM, which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 9396 EUR per QALY gained. Conclusions: According to the present analysis, the use of isCGM is considered cost-effective in adult individuals with type 1 diabetes in a real-world setting in Finland.

Aims: To determine the effect of the use of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) on acute diabetes-related complications in adult type 1 diabetes patients. Methods: Six hundred and forty-two adult type 1 diabetes patients with isCGM were identified from electronic health records in Siun sote region in Eastern Finland. A retrospective real-world analysis was conducted combining hospital admission and prehospital emergency service data to compare incidences of hypoglycemia requiring emergency medical support (EMS) involvement or hospital admission and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) before and after the start of isCGM. Data were collected from January 2015 to April 2020. Primary outcome was the rate of hypoglycemia requiring EMS involvement or hospital admission and DKA events. HbA1c was recorded at the start of isCGM and was compared with the last known HbA1c during the use of isCGM. The isCGM used in the study did not contain alarm functions. Results: Altogether 220 hypoglycemic events were identified during the study period. Incidence rate of hypoglycemic events decreased after the start of isCGM (72 events, incidence rate 50 events/1000 person-years) compared with the time before the start (148 events, incidence rate 76 events/1000 person-years) (p = 0.043). The incidence rate of DKA decreased after the start of isCGM compared with time before isCGM use (4 and 15 events/1000 person-years, respectively; p = 0.002). The change in mean HbA1c was − 0.28% (− 3.1 mmol/mol) between baseline and the last HbA1c measurement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In addition to lowering HbA1c in type 1 diabetes patients, isCGM is also effective in preventing acute diabetes-related complications such as hypoglycemia requiring EMS involvement or hospital admission and DKA.

Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of long-term use of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.Design and methods: In this retrospective real-world study, 689 patients with type 1 diabetes who were >18 years of age and using isCGM were identified from the electronic patient records in North Karelia, Finland. A1C data were collected before and after the initiation of isCGM. The primary outcome was a change in the mean A1C over time after isCGM started.Results: The greatest reductions in the mean A1C levels were observed 6 months (−0.54% [−5.9 mmol/mol], P <0.001) and 12 months (−0.42% [−4.6 mmol/mol], P 9% (75 mmol/mol) benefited the most from initiation of isCGM (reduction −0.97% [−10.6 mmol/mol], P <0.001, at 12 months and −0.92% [−10.1 mmol/mol], P <0.001, at 48 months). Neither sex nor age at the start of isCGM were correlated with A1C reduction.Conclusion: Use of isCGM improves A1C levels significantly in adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Significant reduction in A1C persisted over 4 years of use, although the effect diminished over time.