Rumesa Batul
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Rumesa Batul has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mohmed Isaqali Karobari
Department of conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
3 shared publications - Alexander Maniangat Luke
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
2 shared publications - Ali Ahmed Assiry
Department of Preventive Dental Science, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia
2 shared publications - Galvin Sim Siang Lin
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus
1 shared publication - Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina
Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
1 shared publication - Krishna Prasad Shetty
Department of Clinical Science, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Al-Jruf, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 April 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 13 (7) , 4517
Microstructural and Elemental Characterization of Root Canal Sealers Using FTIR, SEM, and EDS Analysis
Background: Root canal sealers and repair materials should have the desirable physical, chemical, and biological characteristics, and an antibacterial effect if possible. There is little information available on the biocompatibility of new sealers on the market. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) can offer trustworthy data to examine chemical structures; another technique for revealing the elements in the constituents that may contribute to the cytotoxicity of these sealers is scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with the goal of elemental mapping utilizing energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Methodology: All the root canal sealers were mixed as per the manufacturers’ instructions and allowed to set in molds for 24 h. Then, the samples were placed into an incubator (Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany for 72 h, in a moist environment to allow complete chemical setting of the sealers. The organic and inorganic components of the sample were identified using FTIR with the wavelength length in the infra-red region measuring 400–450 nm. The finely crushed samples were coated with gold metal; following that, the sealer samples were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 5000×, 10,000×, and 20,000× magnification, followed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Results: The surfaces of BioRoot and DiaRoot sealers revealed a relatively uniform distribution of irregular micro-sized particles aggregated in clusters, with the particle size ranging from 1 to 65 µm and 0.4 to 55 µm, respectively. OneFill, iRoot, and CeraSeal demonstrated irregularly shaped particles with particle sizes of 0.5 to 105 µm, 0.5 to 195 µm, and 0.3 to 68 µm, respectively. The EDX microanalysis revealed that oxygen, calcium, and carbon were found in all the tested sealer materials. Silicone and zirconium were absent in DiaRoot, but DiaRoot contained fluoride and ytterbium. Moreover, aluminum was noted in DiaRoot, One Fill, and CeraSeal, and chloride was only observed in BioRoot. FTIR analysis revealed strong absorption bands at 666 cm−1 and 709 cm−1 in BioRoot. Bands at 739 cm−1, 804 cm−1, 863 cm−1, 898 cm−1, and 1455 cm−1 were observed in DiaRoot. Bands at 736 cm−1 and 873 cm−1 in OneFill suggested the presence of C-H bending. Similarly, bands were observed at 937 cm−1, 885 cm−1, 743 cm−1, and 1455 cm−1 in iRoot, representing C-H stretching. Conclusions: All root canal sealers had diverse surface morphologies that contained irregular, micro-sized particles that were uniformly distributed, and they lacked heavy metals. All the experimental sealers comprised mainly calcium, oxygen, and carbon.
- 2 April 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 13 (7) , 4517
Open AccessMicrostructural and Elemental Characterization of Root Canal Sealers Using FTIR, SEM, and EDS Analysis
Background: Root canal sealers and repair materials should have the desirable physical, chemical, and biological characteristics, and an antibacterial effect if possible. There is little information available on the biocompatibility of new sealers on the market. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) can offer trustworthy data to examine chemical structures; another technique for revealing the elements in the constituents that may contribute to the cytotoxicity of these sealers is scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with the goal of elemental mapping utilizing energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Methodology: All the root canal sealers were mixed as per the manufacturers’ instructions and allowed to set in molds for 24 h. Then, the samples were placed into an incubator (Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany for 72 h, in a moist environment to allow complete chemical setting of the sealers. The organic and inorganic components of the sample were identified using FTIR with the wavelength length in the infra-red region measuring 400–450 nm. The finely crushed samples were coated with gold metal; following that, the sealer samples were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 5000×, 10,000×, and 20,000× magnification, followed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Results: The surfaces of BioRoot and DiaRoot sealers revealed a relatively uniform distribution of irregular micro-sized particles aggregated in clusters, with the particle size ranging from 1 to 65 µm and 0.4 to 55 µm, respectively. OneFill, iRoot, and CeraSeal demonstrated irregularly shaped particles with particle sizes of 0.5 to 105 µm, 0.5 to 195 µm, and 0.3 to 68 µm, respectively. The EDX microanalysis revealed that oxygen, calcium, and carbon were found in all the tested sealer materials. Silicone and zirconium were absent in DiaRoot, but DiaRoot contained fluoride and ytterbium. Moreover, aluminum was noted in DiaRoot, One Fill, and CeraSeal, and chloride was only observed in BioRoot. FTIR analysis revealed strong absorption bands at 666 cm−1 and 709 cm−1 in BioRoot. Bands at 739 cm−1, 804 cm−1, 863 cm−1, 898 cm−1, and 1455 cm−1 were observed in DiaRoot. Bands at 736 cm−1 and 873 cm−1 in OneFill suggested the presence of C-H bending. Similarly, bands were observed at 937 cm−1, 885 cm−1, 743 cm−1, and 1455 cm−1 in iRoot, representing C-H stretching. Conclusions: All root canal sealers had diverse surface morphologies that contained irregular, micro-sized particles that were uniformly distributed, and they lacked heavy metals. All the experimental sealers comprised mainly calcium, oxygen, and carbon.
- Open Access
- 30 January 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 13 (3) , 1758
Comparative Evaluation of Microhardness, Water Sorption and Solubility of Biodentin and Nano-Zirconia-Modified Biodentin and FTIR Analysis
Aim: This study compares the microhardness, water sorption and solubility of nano-zirconia-reinforced biodentin groups to commercially available biodentine. Materials and Methods: Samples were prepared by adding different percentages of nano zirconia to biodentin. Four groups were categorized as follows: group 1 used Biodentin as the control group, group 2 used 10% nano zirconia and 90% Biodentine, group 3 used 20% nano zirconia and 80% Biodentine, and group 4 used 30% nano zirconia and 70% Biodentine. A Vickers microhardness tester was used to measure the microhardness of the groups according to ISO 4049/2000. The water sorption and solubility of the divided groups were assessed using disk-shaped molds. The second weight was measured on an electronic weight machine after two weeks, and values were recorded. FTIR analysis was performed. Vickers microhardness, water sorption and solubility were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, and for multiple comparisons, a post hoc Tukey’s HSD test with a significance level of p < 0.05 was performed. Group 3 had the highest mean microhardness measurement among all groups. The microhardness values for all groups in descending order are as follows: group 3, group 2, group 1 and group 4 (p = 0.008). Group 2 showed the lowest mean of water sorption compared among all groups. Group 2 has the lowest mean of water sorption, followed by group 3, group 1 and group 4 (p = 0.002). Group 4 showed the highest water sorption among all groups. Group 4 exhibited the highest solubility mean among all groups. Group 1 had the lowest mean of solubility, followed by group 2, group 3 and group 4 (p = 0.000). The FTIR spectra of different types of biodentin showed the absorbance peaks of the precipitates of each modified biodentin. The absorbance peaks fell between 474.63 cm−1 and 3438.33 cm−1. Conclusion: Biodentin is a competitive biomimetic material, but it lacks hardness and has more solubility. Thus, adding nano zirconia improved microhardness and reduced water sorption. The solubility of 20% nano zirconia added to biodentin was almost close to biodentin but with no significance. The 20% nano-zirconia-modified biodentin showed overall better properties compared to biodentin. The 20% nano-zirconia-modified biodentin can be used in deep cavities as a single restorative material instead of multi-layered restorations to increase longevity without microleakage and failure of restoration.
- 30 January 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 13 (3) , 1758
Open AccessComparative Evaluation of Microhardness, Water Sorption and Solubility of Biodentin and Nano-Zirconia-Modified Biodentin and FTIR Analysis
Aim: This study compares the microhardness, water sorption and solubility of nano-zirconia-reinforced biodentin groups to commercially available biodentine. Materials and Methods: Samples were prepared by adding different percentages of nano zirconia to biodentin. Four groups were categorized as follows: group 1 used Biodentin as the control group, group 2 used 10% nano zirconia and 90% Biodentine, group 3 used 20% nano zirconia and 80% Biodentine, and group 4 used 30% nano zirconia and 70% Biodentine. A Vickers microhardness tester was used to measure the microhardness of the groups according to ISO 4049/2000. The water sorption and solubility of the divided groups were assessed using disk-shaped molds. The second weight was measured on an electronic weight machine after two weeks, and values were recorded. FTIR analysis was performed. Vickers microhardness, water sorption and solubility were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, and for multiple comparisons, a post hoc Tukey’s HSD test with a significance level of p < 0.05 was performed. Group 3 had the highest mean microhardness measurement among all groups. The microhardness values for all groups in descending order are as follows: group 3, group 2, group 1 and group 4 (p = 0.008). Group 2 showed the lowest mean of water sorption compared among all groups. Group 2 has the lowest mean of water sorption, followed by group 3, group 1 and group 4 (p = 0.002). Group 4 showed the highest water sorption among all groups. Group 4 exhibited the highest solubility mean among all groups. Group 1 had the lowest mean of solubility, followed by group 2, group 3 and group 4 (p = 0.000). The FTIR spectra of different types of biodentin showed the absorbance peaks of the precipitates of each modified biodentin. The absorbance peaks fell between 474.63 cm−1 and 3438.33 cm−1. Conclusion: Biodentin is a competitive biomimetic material, but it lacks hardness and has more solubility. Thus, adding nano zirconia improved microhardness and reduced water sorption. The solubility of 20% nano zirconia added to biodentin was almost close to biodentin but with no significance. The 20% nano-zirconia-modified biodentin showed overall better properties compared to biodentin. The 20% nano-zirconia-modified biodentin can be used in deep cavities as a single restorative material instead of multi-layered restorations to increase longevity without microleakage and failure of restoration.
- Open Access
Salivary Antibody Response of COVID-19 in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Young Adult Populations
COVID-19 is a terrible pandemic sweeping the whole world with more than 600 million confirmed cases and 6 million recorded deaths. Vaccination was identified as the sole option that could help in combatting the disease. In this study, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed in the saliva of vaccinated participants (Covaxin and Covishield) through enzyme-linked sorbent assay (ELISA). The IgG antibody titres in females were significantly greater than those of males. The total antibody titres of vaccinated individuals were greater than those of unvaccinated participants, although not statistically significant. Individuals who had completed both doses of vaccination had higher antibody levels than those who had received a single dose. People who had experienced COVID-19 after vaccination had better immunity compared to those who were unvaccinated with COVID-19 history. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific antibodies were successfully demonstrated in saliva samples, and knowledge about the immunity triggered by the vaccines can assist in making informed choices.
Open AccessSalivary Antibody Response of COVID-19 in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Young Adult Populations
COVID-19 is a terrible pandemic sweeping the whole world with more than 600 million confirmed cases and 6 million recorded deaths. Vaccination was identified as the sole option that could help in combatting the disease. In this study, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed in the saliva of vaccinated participants (Covaxin and Covishield) through enzyme-linked sorbent assay (ELISA). The IgG antibody titres in females were significantly greater than those of males. The total antibody titres of vaccinated individuals were greater than those of unvaccinated participants, although not statistically significant. Individuals who had completed both doses of vaccination had higher antibody levels than those who had received a single dose. People who had experienced COVID-19 after vaccination had better immunity compared to those who were unvaccinated with COVID-19 history. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific antibodies were successfully demonstrated in saliva samples, and knowledge about the immunity triggered by the vaccines can assist in making informed choices.