Pauline Slottje

To explore insomnia management in general practice, with a focus on sleep medication prescription. Descriptive analysis of anonymized routine general practice care data extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs), including demographics, free text annotations from sleep consultations and sleep medication prescriptions covering one year before up to two years after the registration of the International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC) code P06 'Sleep disturbance'. Twenty-one general practices in an urban area of the Netherlands. Adults (18-85 year) with a first sleep consultation with their GP. Documented non-pharmacological and sleep medication treatment. Of the 1,089 patients who consulted their general practitioner (GP) for sleep disturbance for the first time, about 50% had one more sleep consultation during the two years follow-up. Over two years including the first consultation, GPs documented a non-pharmacological intervention for 48.4% of the patients and prescribed sleep medication to 77.0%. 64.6% of the patients received a sleep medication prescription in the first consultation. Among patients receiving medication (N = 838); 59.6% received more than one prescription; 76.8% received one or more short-acting benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA), 39.5% one or more unrecommended drugs and 14.7% >180 pills of BZRAs in two years. Although the guidelines advocate non-pharmacological treatment and warn against unwarranted sleep medication, it is still very common in Dutch general practice to prescribe medication, even at the first sleep consultation. Prescriptions frequently include unrecommended and off-label drugs or repeated BZRA prescriptions.

Introduction: In the Netherlands, the onset of the coronavirus pandemic saw shifts in primary health service provision away from physical consultations, cancer-screening programs were temporarily halted, and government messaging focused on remaining at home. In March and April 2020, weekly cancer diagnoses decreased to 73% of their pre-COVID levels, and 39% for skin cancer. This study aims to explore the effect of the COVID pandemic on patient presentations for cancer-related symptoms in primary care in The Netherlands. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical primary care data. Monthly incidences of patient presentations for cancer-related symptoms in five clinical databases in The Netherlands were analysed from March 2018 to February 2021. Results: Data demonstrated reductions in the incidence of cancer-related symptom presentations to primary care during the first COVID wave (March-June 2020) of −34% (95% CI: −43 to −23%) for all symptoms combined. In the second wave (October 2020–February 2021) there was no change in incidence observed (−8%, 95% CI −20% to 6%). Alarm-symptoms demonstrated decreases in incidence in the first wave with subsequent incidences that continued to rise in the second wave, such as: first wave: breast lump −17% (95% CI: −27 to −6%) and haematuria −15% (95% CI −24% to −6%); and second wave: rectal bleeding +14% (95% CI: 0 to 30%) and breast lump +14% (95% CI: 2 to 27%). Presentations of common non-alarm symptom such as tiredness and naevus demonstrated decreased in-cidences in the first wave of 45% (95% CI: −55% to −33%) and 37% (95% CI −47% to −25%). In the second wave, tiredness incidence was reduced by 20% (95% CI: −33% to −3%). Subgroup analy-sis did not demonstrate difference in incidence according to sex, age groups, comorbidity status, or previous history of cancer. Conclusions: These data describe large-scale primary care avoidance that did not increase until the end of the first COVID year for many cancer-related symptoms, suggestive that substantial numbers of patients delayed presenting to primary care. For those patients who had underlying cancer, this may have had impacted the cancer stage at diagnosis, treatment, and mortality.