Susan E. Shore
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Susan E. Shore has a total of 74 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David T. Martel
Kresge Hearing Research Institute and Dept. of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan
10 shared publications - Calvin Wu
Kresge Hearing Research Institute and Dept. of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan
8 shared publications Jianxun Zhou
Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Room 5434A Med Sci I, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA
8 shared publicationsCalvin Wu
Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, U.S.A.
7 shared publications- Chunhua Zeng
Department of Genetics and Endocrinology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Guangzhou 510623, China
4 shared publications Roxana A. Stefanescu
Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 6 (6) , e2315914
Reversing Synchronized Brain Circuits Using Targeted Auditory-Somatosensory Stimulation to Treat Phantom Percepts
Importance: Animal models have shown altered dorsal cochlear nucleus circuitry in animals that develop tinnitus; however, precise treatment using bisensory (auditory and somatosensory) stimuli can reverse altered neural patterns and lessen tinnitus.Objective: To confirm and extend the findings of a pilot study, which suggested an increased efficacy of bisensory stimulation, to a clinical trial with a greater duration and greater number of participants.Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, crossover, single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 2019, with a 3-month follow-up per participant ending in July 2022. Eligible adults were recruited from the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Eligibility criteria included bothersome tinnitus (Tinnitus Functional Index [TFI] score, ≥17 points), somatic tinnitus, normal to moderate hearing loss, and no other tinnitus treatments in the 6 months prior to the trial. Included participants were randomized to either treatment group 1, which received active (bisensory) treatment, or group 2, which received the control (auditory-only) treatment. Results were analyzed using intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) populations.Intervention: Precisely timed bisensory (combined auditory and somatosensory) treatment was delivered through a portable, custom, take-home device that was provided to each participant for daily, at-home treatments. Group 1 participants received 30 minutes per day of the bisensory treatment for 6 weeks, followed by a 6-week washout phase, and then 30 minutes per day of the auditory-only treatment followed by a second 6-week washout phase. Group 2 participants received the auditory-only treatment first, followed by a washout phase, and then the bisensory treatment followed by a second washout phase.Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were changes in TFI score and tinnitus loudness level from baseline through week 6 and week 12.Results: Of 337 screened individuals, 99 (mean [SD] age, 47 [12.7] years; 59 males [60%]; 85 with non-Hispanic White [86%] race and ethnicity) were enrolled into the study and randomized to treatment group 1 (n = 49) or group 2 (n = 50). The active but not the control treatment resulted in clinically significant decreases in TFI scores at week 6 of phase 1 (ITT population: –12.0 [95% CI, –16.9 to –7.9] points; P < .001; PP population: –13.2 [95% CI, –16.0 to –10.5] points; P < .001). Decreases in tinnitus loudness level were greater than 6 dB sensation level (SL; >half as loud) at week 6 for the bisensory treatment group, with little effect for the auditory-only treatment control group at week 6 of phase 1 (ITT population: –5.8 [95% CI, –9.5 to –2.2] dB; P = .08; PP population: –7.2 [95% CI, –11.4 to –3.1] dB; P = .03), and up to 11 dB SL at week 12 of phase 2 (ITT population: –10.9 [95% CI, –15.2 to –6.5] dB; P = .001; PP population: –14.1 [95% CI, –18.4 to –9.8] dB; P < .001). Decreased tinnitus loudness level and TFI scores extended into the washout phase, indicating a prolonged treatment effect.Conclusions and Relevance: This trial found that precisely timed bisensory treatment using stimuli and timing developed in a validated animal model was effective for adults with somatic tinnitus. Prolonged reduction in tinnitus symptoms can result from using an extended treatment duration.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03621735
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 6 (6) , e2315914
Reversing Synchronized Brain Circuits Using Targeted Auditory-Somatosensory Stimulation to Treat Phantom Percepts
Importance: Animal models have shown altered dorsal cochlear nucleus circuitry in animals that develop tinnitus; however, precise treatment using bisensory (auditory and somatosensory) stimuli can reverse altered neural patterns and lessen tinnitus.Objective: To confirm and extend the findings of a pilot study, which suggested an increased efficacy of bisensory stimulation, to a clinical trial with a greater duration and greater number of participants.Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, crossover, single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 2019, with a 3-month follow-up per participant ending in July 2022. Eligible adults were recruited from the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Eligibility criteria included bothersome tinnitus (Tinnitus Functional Index [TFI] score, ≥17 points), somatic tinnitus, normal to moderate hearing loss, and no other tinnitus treatments in the 6 months prior to the trial. Included participants were randomized to either treatment group 1, which received active (bisensory) treatment, or group 2, which received the control (auditory-only) treatment. Results were analyzed using intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) populations.Intervention: Precisely timed bisensory (combined auditory and somatosensory) treatment was delivered through a portable, custom, take-home device that was provided to each participant for daily, at-home treatments. Group 1 participants received 30 minutes per day of the bisensory treatment for 6 weeks, followed by a 6-week washout phase, and then 30 minutes per day of the auditory-only treatment followed by a second 6-week washout phase. Group 2 participants received the auditory-only treatment first, followed by a washout phase, and then the bisensory treatment followed by a second washout phase.Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were changes in TFI score and tinnitus loudness level from baseline through week 6 and week 12.Results: Of 337 screened individuals, 99 (mean [SD] age, 47 [12.7] years; 59 males [60%]; 85 with non-Hispanic White [86%] race and ethnicity) were enrolled into the study and randomized to treatment group 1 (n = 49) or group 2 (n = 50). The active but not the control treatment resulted in clinically significant decreases in TFI scores at week 6 of phase 1 (ITT population: –12.0 [95% CI, –16.9 to –7.9] points; P < .001; PP population: –13.2 [95% CI, –16.0 to –10.5] points; P < .001). Decreases in tinnitus loudness level were greater than 6 dB sensation level (SL; >half as loud) at week 6 for the bisensory treatment group, with little effect for the auditory-only treatment control group at week 6 of phase 1 (ITT population: –5.8 [95% CI, –9.5 to –2.2] dB; P = .08; PP population: –7.2 [95% CI, –11.4 to –3.1] dB; P = .03), and up to 11 dB SL at week 12 of phase 2 (ITT population: –10.9 [95% CI, –15.2 to –6.5] dB; P = .001; PP population: –14.1 [95% CI, –18.4 to –9.8] dB; P < .001). Decreased tinnitus loudness level and TFI scores extended into the washout phase, indicating a prolonged treatment effect.Conclusions and Relevance: This trial found that precisely timed bisensory treatment using stimuli and timing developed in a validated animal model was effective for adults with somatic tinnitus. Prolonged reduction in tinnitus symptoms can result from using an extended treatment duration.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03621735
- Open Access
- 30 May 2023
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 601 (14) , 2991-3006
Cochlear synaptopathy impairs suprathreshold tone‐in‐noise coding in the cochlear nucleus
Hearing impairment without threshold elevations can occur when there is damage to high-threshold auditory nerve fibre synapses with cochlear inner hair cells. Instead, cochlear synaptopathy produces suprathreshold deficits, especially in older patients, which affect conversational speech. Given that listening in noise at suprathreshold levels presents significant challenges to the ageing population, we examined the effects of synaptopathy on tone-in-noise coding on the central recipients of auditory nerve fibres, i.e. the cochlear nucleus neurons. To induce synaptopathy, guinea pigs received a unilateral sound overexposure to the left ears. A separate group received sham exposures. At 4 weeks post-exposure, thresholds had recovered but reduced auditory brainstem response wave 1 amplitudes and auditory nerve synapse loss remained on the left side. Single-unit responses were recorded from several cell types in the ventral cochlear nucleus to pure-tone and noise stimuli. Receptive fields and rate-level functions in the presence of continuous broadband noise were examined. The synaptopathy-inducing noise exposure did not affect mean unit tone-in-noise thresholds, nor the tone-in-noise thresholds in each animal, demonstrating equivalent tone-in-noise detection thresholds to sham animals. However, synaptopathy reduced single-unit responses to suprathreshold tones in the presence of background noise, particularly in the cochlear nucleus small cells. These data demonstrate that suprathreshold tone-in-noise deficits following cochlear synaptopathy are evident in the first neural station of the auditory brain, the cochlear nucleus neurons, and provide a potential target for assessment and treatment of listening-in-noise deficits in humans.
- 30 May 2023
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 601 (14) , 2991-3006
Open AccessCochlear synaptopathy impairs suprathreshold tone‐in‐noise coding in the cochlear nucleus
Hearing impairment without threshold elevations can occur when there is damage to high-threshold auditory nerve fibre synapses with cochlear inner hair cells. Instead, cochlear synaptopathy produces suprathreshold deficits, especially in older patients, which affect conversational speech. Given that listening in noise at suprathreshold levels presents significant challenges to the ageing population, we examined the effects of synaptopathy on tone-in-noise coding on the central recipients of auditory nerve fibres, i.e. the cochlear nucleus neurons. To induce synaptopathy, guinea pigs received a unilateral sound overexposure to the left ears. A separate group received sham exposures. At 4 weeks post-exposure, thresholds had recovered but reduced auditory brainstem response wave 1 amplitudes and auditory nerve synapse loss remained on the left side. Single-unit responses were recorded from several cell types in the ventral cochlear nucleus to pure-tone and noise stimuli. Receptive fields and rate-level functions in the presence of continuous broadband noise were examined. The synaptopathy-inducing noise exposure did not affect mean unit tone-in-noise thresholds, nor the tone-in-noise thresholds in each animal, demonstrating equivalent tone-in-noise detection thresholds to sham animals. However, synaptopathy reduced single-unit responses to suprathreshold tones in the presence of background noise, particularly in the cochlear nucleus small cells. These data demonstrate that suprathreshold tone-in-noise deficits following cochlear synaptopathy are evident in the first neural station of the auditory brain, the cochlear nucleus neurons, and provide a potential target for assessment and treatment of listening-in-noise deficits in humans.
- Open Access
Inner hair cell synapse density influences auditory processing
Loss of synapses between spiral ganglion neurons and inner hair cells (IHC synaptopathy), leads to an auditory neuropathy called hidden hearing loss (HHL) characterized by normal auditory thresholds but reduced amplitude of sound-evoked auditory potentials. It has been proposed that synaptopathy and HHL result in poor performance in challenging hearing tasks despite a normal audiogram. However, this has only been tested in animals after exposure to noise or ototoxic drugs, which can cause deficits beyond synaptopathy. Furthermore, the impact of supernumerary synapses on auditory processing has not been evaluated. Here, we studied mice in which IHC synapse counts were increased or decreased by altering neurotrophin 3 (Ntf3) expression in IHC supporting cells. As we previously showed, postnatal Ntf3 knockdown or overexpression reduces or increases, respectively, IHC synapse density and suprathreshold amplitude of sound-evoked auditory potentials without changing cochlear thresholds. We now show that IHC synapse density does not influence the magnitude of the acoustic startle reflex or its prepulse inhibition. In contrast, gap-prepulse inhibition, a behavioral test for auditory temporal processing, is reduced or enhanced according to Ntf3 expression levels. These results indicate that IHC synaptopathy causes temporal processing deficits predicted in HHL. Furthermore, the improvement in temporal acuity achieved by increasing Ntf3 expression and synapse density suggests a therapeutic strategy for improving hearing in noise for individuals with synaptopathy of various etiologies.
Open AccessInner hair cell synapse density influences auditory processing
Loss of synapses between spiral ganglion neurons and inner hair cells (IHC synaptopathy), leads to an auditory neuropathy called hidden hearing loss (HHL) characterized by normal auditory thresholds but reduced amplitude of sound-evoked auditory potentials. It has been proposed that synaptopathy and HHL result in poor performance in challenging hearing tasks despite a normal audiogram. However, this has only been tested in animals after exposure to noise or ototoxic drugs, which can cause deficits beyond synaptopathy. Furthermore, the impact of supernumerary synapses on auditory processing has not been evaluated. Here, we studied mice in which IHC synapse counts were increased or decreased by altering neurotrophin 3 (Ntf3) expression in IHC supporting cells. As we previously showed, postnatal Ntf3 knockdown or overexpression reduces or increases, respectively, IHC synapse density and suprathreshold amplitude of sound-evoked auditory potentials without changing cochlear thresholds. We now show that IHC synapse density does not influence the magnitude of the acoustic startle reflex or its prepulse inhibition. In contrast, gap-prepulse inhibition, a behavioral test for auditory temporal processing, is reduced or enhanced according to Ntf3 expression levels. These results indicate that IHC synaptopathy causes temporal processing deficits predicted in HHL. Furthermore, the improvement in temporal acuity achieved by increasing Ntf3 expression and synapse density suggests a therapeutic strategy for improving hearing in noise for individuals with synaptopathy of various etiologies.
- 6 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 600 (1) , 61-73
Olivocochlear projections contribute to superior intensity coding in cochlear nucleus small cells
Understanding communication signals, especially in noisy environments, is crucial to social interactions. Yet, as we age, acoustic signals can be disrupted by cochlear damage and the subsequent auditory nerve fibre degeneration. The most vulnerable medium‐ and high‐threshold‐auditory nerve fibres innervate various cell types in the cochlear nucleus, among which the small cells are unique in receiving this input exclusively. Furthermore, small cells project to medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons, which in turn send branched collaterals back into the small cell cap. Here, we use single‐unit recordings to characterise small cell firing characteristics and demonstrate superior intensity coding in this cell class. We show converse effects when activating/blocking the MOC system, demonstrating that small‐cell unique coding properties are facilitated by direct cholinergic input from the MOC system. Small cells also maintain tone‐level coding in the presence of background noise. Finally, small cells precisely code low‐frequency modulation more accurately than other ventral cochlear nucleus cell types, demonstrating accurate envelope coding that may be important for vocalisation processing. These results highlight the small cell olivocochlear circuit as a key player in signal processing in noisy environments, which may be selectively degraded in ageing or after noise insult.Key points: Cochlear nucleus small cells receive input from low/medium spontaneous rate auditory nerve fibres and medial olivocochlear neurons. Electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons in the ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body and blocking cholinergic input to small cells using atropine demonstrates an excitatory cholinergic input to small cells, which increases responses to suprathreshold sound. Unique inputs to small cells produce superior sound intensity coding. This coding of intensity is preserved in the presence of background noise, an effect exclusive to this cell type in the cochlear nucleus. These results suggest that small cells serve an essential function in the ascending auditory system, which may be relevant to disorders such as hidden hearing loss.
- 6 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 600 (1) , 61-73
Olivocochlear projections contribute to superior intensity coding in cochlear nucleus small cells
Understanding communication signals, especially in noisy environments, is crucial to social interactions. Yet, as we age, acoustic signals can be disrupted by cochlear damage and the subsequent auditory nerve fibre degeneration. The most vulnerable medium‐ and high‐threshold‐auditory nerve fibres innervate various cell types in the cochlear nucleus, among which the small cells are unique in receiving this input exclusively. Furthermore, small cells project to medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons, which in turn send branched collaterals back into the small cell cap. Here, we use single‐unit recordings to characterise small cell firing characteristics and demonstrate superior intensity coding in this cell class. We show converse effects when activating/blocking the MOC system, demonstrating that small‐cell unique coding properties are facilitated by direct cholinergic input from the MOC system. Small cells also maintain tone‐level coding in the presence of background noise. Finally, small cells precisely code low‐frequency modulation more accurately than other ventral cochlear nucleus cell types, demonstrating accurate envelope coding that may be important for vocalisation processing. These results highlight the small cell olivocochlear circuit as a key player in signal processing in noisy environments, which may be selectively degraded in ageing or after noise insult.Key points: Cochlear nucleus small cells receive input from low/medium spontaneous rate auditory nerve fibres and medial olivocochlear neurons. Electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons in the ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body and blocking cholinergic input to small cells using atropine demonstrates an excitatory cholinergic input to small cells, which increases responses to suprathreshold sound. Unique inputs to small cells produce superior sound intensity coding. This coding of intensity is preserved in the presence of background noise, an effect exclusive to this cell type in the cochlear nucleus. These results suggest that small cells serve an essential function in the ascending auditory system, which may be relevant to disorders such as hidden hearing loss.
- Open Access
Cochlear nucleus small cells use olivocochlear collaterals to encode sounds in noise
Understanding communication signals, especially in noisy environments, is crucial to social interactions. Yet, as we age, acoustic signals can be disrupted by cochlear damage and the subsequent auditory nerve fiber degeneration. The most vulnerable—medium and high-threshold—auditory nerve fibers innervate various cell types in the cochlear nucleus, among which, the small cells are unique in receiving this input exclusively. Furthermore, small cells project to medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons, which in turn send branched collaterals back into the SCC. Here, we use single-unit recordings to characterise small cell firing characteristics and demonstrate superior intensity coding in this cell class. We show converse effects when activating/blocking the MOC system, demonstrating that small-cell unique coding properties are facilitated by direct cholinergic input from the MOC system. Small cells also maintain tone-level coding in the presence of background noise. Finally, small cells precisely code low-frequency modulation more accurately than other ventral CN (VCN) cell types, demonstrating accurate envelope coding that may be important for vocalisation processing. These results highlight the small cell–olivocochlear circuit as a key player in signal processing in noisy environments, which may be selectively degraded in aging or after noise insult.
Open AccessCochlear nucleus small cells use olivocochlear collaterals to encode sounds in noise
Understanding communication signals, especially in noisy environments, is crucial to social interactions. Yet, as we age, acoustic signals can be disrupted by cochlear damage and the subsequent auditory nerve fiber degeneration. The most vulnerable—medium and high-threshold—auditory nerve fibers innervate various cell types in the cochlear nucleus, among which, the small cells are unique in receiving this input exclusively. Furthermore, small cells project to medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons, which in turn send branched collaterals back into the SCC. Here, we use single-unit recordings to characterise small cell firing characteristics and demonstrate superior intensity coding in this cell class. We show converse effects when activating/blocking the MOC system, demonstrating that small-cell unique coding properties are facilitated by direct cholinergic input from the MOC system. Small cells also maintain tone-level coding in the presence of background noise. Finally, small cells precisely code low-frequency modulation more accurately than other ventral CN (VCN) cell types, demonstrating accurate envelope coding that may be important for vocalisation processing. These results highlight the small cell–olivocochlear circuit as a key player in signal processing in noisy environments, which may be selectively degraded in aging or after noise insult.
- Open Access
- 14 January 2021
- Published by Wiley in Neural Plasticity
- Vol. 2021, 1-16
Noise Exposure Alters Glutamatergic and GABAergic Synaptic Connectivity in the Hippocampus and Its Relevance to Tinnitus
Accumulating evidence implicates a role for brain structures outside the ascending auditory pathway in tinnitus, the phantom perception of sound. In addition to other factors such as age-dependent hearing loss, high-level sound exposure is a prominent cause of tinnitus. Here, we examined how noise exposure altered the distribution of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs in the guinea pig hippocampus and determined whether these changes were associated with tinnitus. In experiment one, guinea pigs were overexposed to unilateral narrow-band noise (98 dB SPL, 2 h). Two weeks later, the density of excitatory (VGLUT-1/2) and inhibitory (VGAT) synaptic terminals in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus hippocampal subregions was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Overall, VGLUT-1 density primarily increased, while VGAT density decreased significantly in many regions. Then, to assess whether the noise-induced alterations were persistent and related to tinnitus, experiment two utilized a noise-exposure paradigm shown to induce tinnitus and assessed tinnitus development which was assessed using gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS). Twelve weeks after sound overexposure, changes in excitatory synaptic terminal density had largely recovered regardless of tinnitus status, but the recovery of GABAergic terminal density was dramatically different in animals expressing tinnitus relative to animals resistant to tinnitus. In resistant animals, inhibitory synapse density recovered to preexposure levels, but in animals expressing tinnitus, inhibitory synapse density remained chronically diminished. Taken together, our results suggest that noise exposure induces striking changes in the balance of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs throughout the hippocampus and reveal a potential role for rebounding inhibition in the hippocampus as a protective factor leading to tinnitus resilience.
- 14 January 2021
- Published by Wiley in Neural Plasticity
- Vol. 2021, 1-16
Open AccessNoise Exposure Alters Glutamatergic and GABAergic Synaptic Connectivity in the Hippocampus and Its Relevance to Tinnitus
Accumulating evidence implicates a role for brain structures outside the ascending auditory pathway in tinnitus, the phantom perception of sound. In addition to other factors such as age-dependent hearing loss, high-level sound exposure is a prominent cause of tinnitus. Here, we examined how noise exposure altered the distribution of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs in the guinea pig hippocampus and determined whether these changes were associated with tinnitus. In experiment one, guinea pigs were overexposed to unilateral narrow-band noise (98 dB SPL, 2 h). Two weeks later, the density of excitatory (VGLUT-1/2) and inhibitory (VGAT) synaptic terminals in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus hippocampal subregions was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Overall, VGLUT-1 density primarily increased, while VGAT density decreased significantly in many regions. Then, to assess whether the noise-induced alterations were persistent and related to tinnitus, experiment two utilized a noise-exposure paradigm shown to induce tinnitus and assessed tinnitus development which was assessed using gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS). Twelve weeks after sound overexposure, changes in excitatory synaptic terminal density had largely recovered regardless of tinnitus status, but the recovery of GABAergic terminal density was dramatically different in animals expressing tinnitus relative to animals resistant to tinnitus. In resistant animals, inhibitory synapse density recovered to preexposure levels, but in animals expressing tinnitus, inhibitory synapse density remained chronically diminished. Taken together, our results suggest that noise exposure induces striking changes in the balance of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs throughout the hippocampus and reveal a potential role for rebounding inhibition in the hippocampus as a protective factor leading to tinnitus resilience.
- Open Access
- 26 November 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-13
Ventral cochlear nucleus bushy cells encode hyperacusis in guinea pigs
Psychophysical studies characterize hyperacusis as increased loudness growth over a wide-frequency range, decreased tolerance to loud sounds and reduced behavioral reaction time latencies to high-intensity sounds. While commonly associated with hearing loss, hyperacusis can also occur without hearing loss, implicating the central nervous system in the generation of hyperacusis. Previous studies suggest that ventral cochlear nucleus bushy cells may be putative neural contributors to hyperacusis. Compared to other ventral cochlear nucleus output neurons, bushy cells show high firing rates as well as lower and less variable first-spike latencies at suprathreshold intensities. Following cochlear damage, bushy cells show increased spontaneous firing rates across a wide-frequency range, suggesting that they might also show increased sound-evoked responses and reduced latencies to higher-intensity sounds. However, no studies have examined bushy cells in relationship to hyperacusis. Herein, we test the hypothesis that bushy cells may contribute to the neural basis of hyperacusis by employing noise-overexposure and single-unit electrophysiology. We find that bushy cells exhibit hyperacusis-like neural firing patterns, which are comprised of enhanced sound-driven firing rates, reduced first-spike latencies and wideband increases in excitability.
- 26 November 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-13
Open AccessVentral cochlear nucleus bushy cells encode hyperacusis in guinea pigs
Psychophysical studies characterize hyperacusis as increased loudness growth over a wide-frequency range, decreased tolerance to loud sounds and reduced behavioral reaction time latencies to high-intensity sounds. While commonly associated with hearing loss, hyperacusis can also occur without hearing loss, implicating the central nervous system in the generation of hyperacusis. Previous studies suggest that ventral cochlear nucleus bushy cells may be putative neural contributors to hyperacusis. Compared to other ventral cochlear nucleus output neurons, bushy cells show high firing rates as well as lower and less variable first-spike latencies at suprathreshold intensities. Following cochlear damage, bushy cells show increased spontaneous firing rates across a wide-frequency range, suggesting that they might also show increased sound-evoked responses and reduced latencies to higher-intensity sounds. However, no studies have examined bushy cells in relationship to hyperacusis. Herein, we test the hypothesis that bushy cells may contribute to the neural basis of hyperacusis by employing noise-overexposure and single-unit electrophysiology. We find that bushy cells exhibit hyperacusis-like neural firing patterns, which are comprised of enhanced sound-driven firing rates, reduced first-spike latencies and wideband increases in excitability.
- 9 November 2020
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 599 (2) , 631-645
Inhibitory interneurons in a brainstem circuit adjust their inhibitory motifs to process multimodal input
Key points: Inhibitory‐interneuron networks, consisting of multiple forms of circuit motifs including reciprocal (inhibitory interneurons inhibiting other interneurons) and feedforward (inhibitory interneurons inhibiting principal neurons) connections, are crucial in processing sensory information. The present study applies a statistical method to in vivo multichannel spike trains of dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons to disentangle reciprocal and feedforward‐inhibitory motifs. After inducing input‐specific plasticity, reciprocal and feedforward inhibition are found to be differentially regulated, and the combined effect synergistically modulates circuit output. The findings highlight the interplay among different circuit motifs as a key element in neural computation. Inhibitory interneurons play an essential role in neural computations by utilizing a combination of reciprocal (interneurons inhibiting each other) and feedforward (interneuron inhibiting the principal neuron) inhibition to process information. To disentangle the interplay between the two inhibitory‐circuit motifs and understand their effects on the circuit output, in vivo recordings were made from the guinea pig dorsal cochlear nucleus, a cerebellar‐like brainstem circuit. Spikes from inhibitory interneurons (cartwheel cell) and principal output neurons (fusiform cell) were compared before and after manipulating their common multimodal input. Using a statistical model based on the Cox method of modulated renewal process of spike train influence, reciprocal‐ and feedforward‐inhibition motifs were quantified. In response to altered multimodal input, reciprocal inhibition was strengthened while feedforward inhibition was weakened, and the two motifs combined to modulate fusiform cell output and acoustic‐driven responses. These findings reveal the cartwheel cell's role in auditory and multimodal processing, as well as illustrated the balance between different inhibitory‐circuit motifs as a key element in neural computation.
- 9 November 2020
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 599 (2) , 631-645
Inhibitory interneurons in a brainstem circuit adjust their inhibitory motifs to process multimodal input
Key points: Inhibitory‐interneuron networks, consisting of multiple forms of circuit motifs including reciprocal (inhibitory interneurons inhibiting other interneurons) and feedforward (inhibitory interneurons inhibiting principal neurons) connections, are crucial in processing sensory information. The present study applies a statistical method to in vivo multichannel spike trains of dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons to disentangle reciprocal and feedforward‐inhibitory motifs. After inducing input‐specific plasticity, reciprocal and feedforward inhibition are found to be differentially regulated, and the combined effect synergistically modulates circuit output. The findings highlight the interplay among different circuit motifs as a key element in neural computation. Inhibitory interneurons play an essential role in neural computations by utilizing a combination of reciprocal (interneurons inhibiting each other) and feedforward (interneuron inhibiting the principal neuron) inhibition to process information. To disentangle the interplay between the two inhibitory‐circuit motifs and understand their effects on the circuit output, in vivo recordings were made from the guinea pig dorsal cochlear nucleus, a cerebellar‐like brainstem circuit. Spikes from inhibitory interneurons (cartwheel cell) and principal output neurons (fusiform cell) were compared before and after manipulating their common multimodal input. Using a statistical model based on the Cox method of modulated renewal process of spike train influence, reciprocal‐ and feedforward‐inhibition motifs were quantified. In response to altered multimodal input, reciprocal inhibition was strengthened while feedforward inhibition was weakened, and the two motifs combined to modulate fusiform cell output and acoustic‐driven responses. These findings reveal the cartwheel cell's role in auditory and multimodal processing, as well as illustrated the balance between different inhibitory‐circuit motifs as a key element in neural computation.
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Neuroscience
- Vol. 407, 170-181
Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Fusiform-cell Plasticity is Altered in Salicylate-induced Tinnitus
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Neuroscience
- Vol. 407, 170-181
Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Fusiform-cell Plasticity is Altered in Salicylate-induced Tinnitus