Muhammad Asghar
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Muhammad Asghar has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Angela Minichiello
Department of Engineering Education, Utah State University
8 shared publications Sheryl Sorby
University of Cincinnati
5 shared publications- David Reeping
University of Cincinnati
4 shared publications - Gregory Bucks4 shared publications
- Teri Murphy
Ohio State University, USA
4 shared publications - Daniel M. Kane
University of Wisconsin-Madison University of California San Diego
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 16 (6) , 847
Educating the Next Generation of Engineers: Spatial Thinking Is Key to Their Success
This paper attempts to answer questions regarding the link between engineering success and spatial skills through three themes. The previous research of the authors in examining the questions surrounding each theme is the focus of this paper; we acknowledge that others around the world may have conducted similar research, but the specific findings of the authors are the main focus of this paper. In the first theme, we examine data from several author-led studies where positive correlations have been found between spatial skill levels and proficiency in tasks that are a part of what it means to be an engineer. Studies in Theme 1 explore the positive contribution of spatial skills in solving mathematical problems, solving engineering problems, coding, designing, and even technical writing. Theme 2 examines how spatial skills naturally develop just by being enrolled in an engineering program. Taking part in the spatially demanding activities inherent to engineering studies appears to improve the spatial skills of students in our programs. In Theme 3, we examine the result of implementing explicit spatial skills training for students with initially weak skills. In this theme, the impact of spatial skills training on spatial skills, grades in technical courses, and retention in engineering is explored. We begin with a review of the literature that informed the author-led studies in each theme. Finally, we conclude with a call for reform, advocating for an engineering education that acknowledges the importance of spatial skills development for student success and committing to ensuring that all who want to can become the future innovators in the profession.
- 28 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 16 (6) , 847
Open AccessEducating the Next Generation of Engineers: Spatial Thinking Is Key to Their Success
This paper attempts to answer questions regarding the link between engineering success and spatial skills through three themes. The previous research of the authors in examining the questions surrounding each theme is the focus of this paper; we acknowledge that others around the world may have conducted similar research, but the specific findings of the authors are the main focus of this paper. In the first theme, we examine data from several author-led studies where positive correlations have been found between spatial skill levels and proficiency in tasks that are a part of what it means to be an engineer. Studies in Theme 1 explore the positive contribution of spatial skills in solving mathematical problems, solving engineering problems, coding, designing, and even technical writing. Theme 2 examines how spatial skills naturally develop just by being enrolled in an engineering program. Taking part in the spatially demanding activities inherent to engineering studies appears to improve the spatial skills of students in our programs. In Theme 3, we examine the result of implementing explicit spatial skills training for students with initially weak skills. In this theme, the impact of spatial skills training on spatial skills, grades in technical courses, and retention in engineering is explored. We begin with a review of the literature that informed the author-led studies in each theme. Finally, we conclude with a call for reform, advocating for an engineering education that acknowledges the importance of spatial skills development for student success and committing to ensuring that all who want to can become the future innovators in the profession.
- Open Access
- 20 November 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Community College Journal of Research and Practice
- p. 1-31
Enhancing STEM Workforce Development via Non-Degree Credentialing: A Systematic Literature Review
- 20 November 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Community College Journal of Research and Practice
- p. 1-31
Open AccessEnhancing STEM Workforce Development via Non-Degree Credentialing: A Systematic Literature Review
- 21 August 2025
- Published by American Society for Engineering Education
BOARD # 221: A Re-imagined First-Year Engineering Program—FYE2.0
- 21 August 2025
- Published by American Society for Engineering Education
BOARD # 221: A Re-imagined First-Year Engineering Program—FYE2.0
- 21 August 2025
- Published by American Society for Engineering Education
FYE 2.0: Re-envisioning the First-Year Engineering Curriculum
- 21 August 2025
- Published by American Society for Engineering Education
FYE 2.0: Re-envisioning the First-Year Engineering Curriculum