JRJames K. Richardson

James K. Richardson

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


James K. Richardson has a total of 34 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Association of intraindividual variability in simple reaction time with balance and falls in older cancer survivors: A secondary analysis

    by Brendan L. McNeish, C.M.S. Shores, Sarah G. Bell, Kim Dittus, Jurdan Mossburg, Nicholas Krant, Jack A. Steinharter, Kendall Feb, Michael K. Hehir, Mark S. Redfern, et al.


  • Unipedal stance time is associated with fall outcomes in older chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors: A retrospective study

    by Brendan L. McNeish, Kim Dittus, Jurdan Mossburg, Nicholas Krant, Jack A. Steinharter, Kendall Feb, Hunter Cote, Michael K. Hehir, Rebecca Reynolds, Sarah G. Bell, et al.


  • Open Access

    Suppressing a Blocked Balance Recovery Step: A Novel Method to Assess an Inhibitory Postural Response

    by David A. E. Bolton, Charlie C. Baggett, Chase A. Mitton, Sara A. Harper, James K. Richardson

    Stepping to recover balance is an important way we avoid falling. However, when faced with obstacles in the step path, we must adapt such reactions. Physical obstructions are typically detected through vision, which then cues step modification. The present study describes a novel method to assess visually prompted step inhibition in a reactive balance context. In our task, participants recovered balance by quickly stepping after being released from a supported forward lean. On rare trials, however, an obstacle blocked the stepping path. The timing of vision relative to postural perturbation was controlled using occlusion goggles to regulate task difficulty. Furthermore, we explored step suppression in our balance task related to inhibitory capacity measured at the hand using a clinically feasible handheld device (ReacStick). Our results showed that ReacStick and step outcomes were significantly correlated in terms of successful inhibition (r = 0.57) and overall reaction accuracy (r = 0.76). This study presents a novel method for assessing rapid inhibition in a dynamic postural context, a capacity that appears to be a necessary prerequisite to a subsequent adaptive strategy. Moreover, this capacity is significantly related to ReacStick performance, suggesting a potential clinical translation.


  • Executive function is associated with balance and falls in older cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study

    by Brendan L. McNeish, Kim Dittus, Jurdan Mossburg, Nicholas Krant, John A. Steinharter, Kendall Feb, Hunter Cote, Michael K. Hehir, Rebecca Reynolds, Mark S. Redfern, et al.


  • Open Access

    The relationship between clinical measures of cognitive function and grip strength in healthy older adults

    by James K. Richardson, Toby J. Ellmers

    Background: Handgrip strength is considered a surrogate for musculoskeletal strength, however there is emerging evidence of an association with cognition. The specific neurocognitive attribute which best associates with grip strength is unknown. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis on baseline data in 49 healthy older adults. Grip strength was corrected for body mass index. Control independent variables included age, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Trails B. Experimental variables included a clinical measure of simple reaction time, and clinical and computerized go/no-go tasks. The clinical Go/No-Go measure was determined with ReacStick, a rod-shaped device which – when released by the examiner – requires the participant to decide within 390 ms whether to catch the device or let it fall to the ground. Results: Bivariate analysis demonstrated that age and all cognitive measures other than the computer go/no-go response accuracy related to grip strength. Multivariate analyses showed that following inclusion of the control variables, only ReacStick measures (reaction accuracy/simple reaction time) significantly predicted grip strength, explaining an additional 15.90% variance (p = 0.026). In contrast, computerized Go/No-Go accuracy (p = 0.391), response time variability (p = 0.463), and the control variables (p value range = 0.566–0.942) did not predict grip strength. Conclusion: A short latency (< 390 ms) visuomotor Go/No-Go task independently predicted over 15% of grip strength variance, whereas a slower screen-based Go/No-Go task did not. These findings support the notion that declining grip strength likely reflects sub-clinical brain changes as well as musculoskeletal dysfunction, possibly explaining the potent relationships between grip strength, disability, chronic disease, and mortality.


  • Open Access

    Short-latency inhibition mitigates the relationship between conscious movement processing and overly cautious gait

    by Toby J Ellmers, Elmar C Kal, James K Richardson, William R Young

    Background: Overly cautious gait is common in older adults. This is characterised by excessively slow gait, shortened steps, broadened base of support and increased double limb support. The current study sought to (1) evaluate if overly cautious gait is associated with attempts to consciously process walking movements, and (2) explore whether an individual’s ability to rapidly inhibit a dominant motor response serves to mitigate this relationship. Methods: A total of 50 older adults walked at a self-selected pace on an instrumented walkway containing two raised wooden obstacles (height = 23 cm). Trait conscious movement processing was measured with the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale. Short-latency inhibitory function was assessed using a validated electronic go/no-go ruler catch protocol. We used linear regressions to explore the relationship between these variables and gait parameters indicative of overly cautious gait. Results: When controlling for general cognitive function (MoCA), and functional balance (Berg Balance Scale), the interaction between trait conscious movement processing and short-latency inhibition capacity significantly predicted gait velocity, step length and double limb support. Specifically, older adults with higher trait conscious movement processing and poorer inhibition were more likely to exhibit gait characteristics indicative of cautious gait (i.e. reduced velocity, shorter step lengths and increased double limb support). Neither conscious movement processing nor inhibition independently predicted gait performance. Conclusion: The combination of excessive movement processing tendencies and poor short-latency inhibitory capacity was associated with dysfunctional or ‘overly cautious’ gait. It is therefore plausible that improvement in either factor may lead to improved gait and reduced fall risk.


  • Motor amplitudes may predict electromyography‐confirmed radiculopathy in patients referred for radiating limb pain

    by Brendan McNeish, Sandra Hearn, Anita Craig, Ann Laidlaw, Mark Ziadeh, James K. Richardson

    Introduction Radiculopathy is diagnosed by needle electromyography, with nerve conduction studies excluding alternative diagnoses. Methods In patients referred for electrodiagnostic evaluation of radiating limb pain, we compared ulnar motor amplitudes between those with and without electromyographically‐confirmed C8 radiculopathy, as well as fibular motor amplitudes between those with and without electromyographically‐confirmed L5 radiculopathy. Results Patients with electromyographically‐confirmed C8 or L5 radiculopathy demonstrated decreased ulnar or fibular motor amplitudes, respectively, as compared to patients without. Receiver operator characteristics curves demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with areas under the curve of 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. 0ptimal cut‐offs for electromyographically‐confirmed C8 and L5 radiculopathies were 10.2 mV and 3.6 mV, respectively, with associated sensitivities/specificities of 0.86/0.74 and 0.92/0.60. Discussion Ulnar and fibular motor amplitudes may have clinical utility in assessing the likelihood of patients demonstrating electromyographically‐confirmed C8 and L5 radiculopathies with active denervation. The findings may be particularly useful in patients intolerant of needle EMG.