Ruihua Fang

Ruihua Fang

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ruihua Fang has a total of 31 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Wei Sun

    Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong People's Republic of China

    3 shared publications
  • Weiping Wen

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

    2 shared publications
  • Fanqin Wei

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, PR China; Institute of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, PR China; Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolarygology, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, PR China

    1 shared publication
  • Fenghong Chen

    Department of Otolaryngology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou China

    1 shared publication
  • Jian Li

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

    1 shared publication
  • Jianbo Shi

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Surgery in Patients With T1 ‐ 2N1M0 Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Dual‐Cohort Analysis of SEER and Institutional Data

    by Zhangwei Hu, Renqiang Ma, Yihui Wen, Jie Deng, Wei Sun, Lin Chen, Siyu Chen, Weiping Wen, Wenbin Lei

    Background: The optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with T2‐3N0‐3 M0 or T1N1‐3 M0 hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) and the use of postoperative radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy for patients with T1‐2N1M0 HPSCC remain controversial. We aimed to determine whether these additional treatments improve the prognosis in HPSCC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the databases held by the SEER (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results) program and a tertiary referral center in China to evaluate the survival outcomes of surgical intervention for T2‐3N0‐3 M0 and T1N1‐3 M0 HPSCC and of postoperative radiotherapy for T1‐2N1M0 disease. Results: The SEER contained data for 1235 patients with T2‐3N0‐3 M0 or T1N1‐3 M0 HPSCC, of whom 220 underwent surgery as their first treatment and 737 received non‐surgical treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between these two groups. Data were also available for 30 patients in the SEER who were treated by surgery alone ( n = 11), surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy ( n = 7), or surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy with systemic therapy ( n = 12). Similarly, 23 patients at our hospital were identified to have been treated by surgery alone ( n = 7), surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy ( n = 10), or surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy with systemic therapy ( n = 6). The SEER data indicated that postoperative radiotherapy improved OS (hazard ratio 0.281, 95% confidence interval 0.079–0.998; p = 0.036). This finding was supported by the data from our hospital, although the improvement in OS was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.360, 95% confidence interval 0.057–2.261; p = 0.224). Postoperative radiotherapy with systemic therapy seemed not to improve OS beyond that achieved by postoperative radiotherapy alone. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in OS in patients with T2‐3N0‐3 M0 or T1N1‐3 M0 HPSCC according to whether or not they underwent surgery as first‐line treatment. Surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a more favorable prognosis than surgery alone in patients with T1‐2N1M0 HPSCC.

  • Open Access

    A deep learning fusion network trained with medical records and laryngoscopic images in the early diagnosis of glottic carcinoma

    by Yi Shuai, Yun Li, Zhaohui Jin, Yuanyuan Li, Lin Chen, Wenqing Chen, Zhenqing Chen, Weixiong Chen, Ruxin Wang, Xiaomao Fan, et al.


  • Open Access

    Risk Factors and Characteristics of the Recurrence of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A 22-Year Experience With 123 Cases at a Tertiary Center

    by Ruihua Fang, Wei Sun, Jianbo Shi, Rui Xu, Liang Peng, Yinyan Lai, Fenghong Chen, Yihui Wen, Weiping Wen, Jian Li

    Objectives. Despite the efficacy of surgical treatments, the high rate of recurrence in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) after surgery remains an unresolved problem. The present study comprehensively analyzed the risk factors and characteristics of JNA recurrence, providing clinical guidance for reducing recurrence.Methods. A total of 123 patients who underwent surgery for JNA between 1997 and 2019 at a single hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the clinical risk factors for the recurrence of JNA. The relapse-free survival and annual cumulative recurrence rates were analyzed for subgroups defined according to clinical parameters.Results. After screening, 78 of the 123 patients were included in the present study. The main risk factors associated with JNA recurrence included the year of diagnosis, tumor size, sphenoid bone invasion, Radkowski stage, surgical approach, and intraoperative bleeding. Importantly, the surgical approach and sphenoid bone invasion were independent prognostic factors affecting recurrence. Patients who underwent endoscopic surgery without sphenoid bone invasion exhibited longer relapse-free survival. In the present study, the overall cumulative recurrence rate of JNA was 38.7%, and recurrence occurred mainly in the first year after the initial surgery.Conclusion. Endoscopic surgery achieved better relapse-free survival in JNA patients, and patients with sphenoid bone invasion should be carefully explored to avoid residual JNA. The recurrence rate of JNA differed among subgroups defined based on clinical parameters and was highest in the first year after surgery. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, along with close follow-up, should be performed strictly within 1 year after the primary operation.