Yung-Ching Chang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Yung-Ching Chang has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chung-Chih Chang
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
1 shared publication - Fang-Ling Chang
Department of Ophthalmology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 970, Taiwan
1 shared publication - Kuei-Ying Su
Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 970, Taiwan
1 shared publication - Ming-Hsun Li
Department of Pathology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
1 shared publication - Ming-Shan He
Department of Ophthalmology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
1 shared publication - Nancy Chen
Department of Ophthalmology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 970, Taiwan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Dexamethasone Implant vs. Anti-VEGF for Diabetic Macular Edema with Epiretinal Membrane: Short-Term Outcomes
Background Diabetic retinopathy frequently coexists with secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM), which may interfere with therapeutic responses in diabetic macular edema (DME). However, consensus on optimal management for DME with concomitant ERM is lacking. This study compared the short-term therapeutic effects of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants and anti-VEGF agents in DME eyes with ERM. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 109 eyes of 71 patients treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF or DEX implant for DME between January 2014 and December 2022. Pre-treatment optical coherence tomography was reviewed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after treatment. The primary outcomes were changes in BCVA and CMT between baseline and follow-up after DEX or anti-VEGF therapy. Results DEX provided a significantly greater relative reduction in CMT for DME eyes with ERM (β = − 15.675 [5.0]), while no significant difference was observed in eyes without ERM compared to anti-VEGF. Anti-VEGF therapy resulted in significantly less CMT reduction in eyes with ERM than in those without ERM (P < 0.001). DEX implantation led to significant BCVA improvement versus anti-VEGF in DME with ERM (OR = 5.287; 95% CI, 1.100–25.417), whereas no significant difference was found in eyes without ERM (OR = 1.128; 95% CI, 0.232–5.493). Conclusions DEX therapy achieved superior short-term anatomical and functional outcomes compared to anti-VEGF in DME with ERM, supporting its consideration as a first-line treatment option in this subgroup.
- 4 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Open AccessDexamethasone Implant vs. Anti-VEGF for Diabetic Macular Edema with Epiretinal Membrane: Short-Term Outcomes
Background Diabetic retinopathy frequently coexists with secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM), which may interfere with therapeutic responses in diabetic macular edema (DME). However, consensus on optimal management for DME with concomitant ERM is lacking. This study compared the short-term therapeutic effects of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants and anti-VEGF agents in DME eyes with ERM. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 109 eyes of 71 patients treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF or DEX implant for DME between January 2014 and December 2022. Pre-treatment optical coherence tomography was reviewed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after treatment. The primary outcomes were changes in BCVA and CMT between baseline and follow-up after DEX or anti-VEGF therapy. Results DEX provided a significantly greater relative reduction in CMT for DME eyes with ERM (β = − 15.675 [5.0]), while no significant difference was observed in eyes without ERM compared to anti-VEGF. Anti-VEGF therapy resulted in significantly less CMT reduction in eyes with ERM than in those without ERM (P < 0.001). DEX implantation led to significant BCVA improvement versus anti-VEGF in DME with ERM (OR = 5.287; 95% CI, 1.100–25.417), whereas no significant difference was found in eyes without ERM (OR = 1.128; 95% CI, 0.232–5.493). Conclusions DEX therapy achieved superior short-term anatomical and functional outcomes compared to anti-VEGF in DME with ERM, supporting its consideration as a first-line treatment option in this subgroup.
- Open Access
- 1 December 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 12 (12) , 3003
Acute Orbital Apex Syndrome Caused by Idiopathic Sclerosing Orbital Inflammation
Idiopathic sclerosing orbital inflammation (ISOI) is a distinct entity among other orbital diseases. It is characterized by marked fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration that can damage orbital structures. Clinical manifestations were variable, including ocular and periocular redness, proptosis, and pain. Ocular motor restrictions and optic nerve dysfunction might occur in severe cases. We herein report a patient of ISOI who presented with total ophthalmoplegia and acute vision loss. His symptoms were relieved mainly as his vision improved to 20/25 after receiving corticosteroid and immunosuppressant therapies. Therefore, ISOI should be one of the deferential diagnoses when we encounter cases with acute orbital apex syndrome. With prompt evaluation and in-time treatment, a favorable outcome is possible.
- 1 December 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 12 (12) , 3003
Open AccessAcute Orbital Apex Syndrome Caused by Idiopathic Sclerosing Orbital Inflammation
Idiopathic sclerosing orbital inflammation (ISOI) is a distinct entity among other orbital diseases. It is characterized by marked fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration that can damage orbital structures. Clinical manifestations were variable, including ocular and periocular redness, proptosis, and pain. Ocular motor restrictions and optic nerve dysfunction might occur in severe cases. We herein report a patient of ISOI who presented with total ophthalmoplegia and acute vision loss. His symptoms were relieved mainly as his vision improved to 20/25 after receiving corticosteroid and immunosuppressant therapies. Therefore, ISOI should be one of the deferential diagnoses when we encounter cases with acute orbital apex syndrome. With prompt evaluation and in-time treatment, a favorable outcome is possible.