Haiqing Fu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Haiqing Fu has a total of 68 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mirit I. Aladjem
National Cancer Institute 2 Bethesda, Md
46 shared publications - Christophe E. Redon
Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
40 shared publications - Yves Pommier
National Cancer Institute 2 Bethesda, Md
40 shared publications - Craig J. Thomas
National Institutes of Health
39 shared publications - Junko Murai
Ehime University
39 shared publications - Michele Ceribelli
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
39 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Results of HTS in CCRF-CEM parent and SLFN11-KO cells
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Results of HTS in CCRF-CEM parent and SLFN11-KO cells
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Supplementary Table S3 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Supplementary Table S3 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S4 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S4 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Results of HTS in K562+Vector and K562+WT SLFN11 cells
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Results of HTS in K562+Vector and K562+WT SLFN11 cells
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) is an increasingly prominent predictive biomarker and a molecular sensor for a wide range of clinical drugs: topoisomerases, PARP and replication inhibitors, and platinum derivatives. To expand the spectrum of drugs and pathways targeting SLFN11, we ran a high-throughput screen with 1,978 mechanistically annotated, oncology-focused compounds in two isogenic pairs of SLFN11-proficient and -deficient cells (CCRF-CEM and K562). We identified 29 hit compounds that selectively kill SLFN11-proficient cells, including not only previously known DNA-targeting agents, but also the neddylation inhibitor pevonedistat (MLN-4924) and the DNA polymerase α inhibitor AHPN/CD437, which both induced SLFN11 chromatin recruitment. By inactivating cullin-ring E3 ligases, pevonedistat acts as an anticancer agent partly by inducing unscheduled re-replication through supraphysiologic accumulation of CDT1, an essential factor for replication initiation. Unlike the known DNA-targeting agents and AHPN/CD437 that recruit SLFN11 onto chromatin in 4 hours, pevonedistat recruited SLFN11 at late time points (24 hours). While pevonedistat induced unscheduled re-replication in SLFN11-deficient cells after 24 hours, the re-replication was largely blocked in SLFN11-proficient cells. The positive correlation between sensitivity to pevonedistat and SLFN11 expression was also observed in non-isogenic cancer cells in three independent cancer cell databases (NCI-60, CTRP: Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal and GDSC: Genomic of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer). The present study reveals that SLFN11 not only detects stressed replication but also inhibits unscheduled re-replication induced by pevonedistat, thereby enhancing its anticancer efficacy. It also suggests SLFN11 as a potential predictive biomarker for pevonedistat in ongoing and future clinical trials.
- 27 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) Kills Cancer Cells Undergoing Unscheduled Re-replication
Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) is an increasingly prominent predictive biomarker and a molecular sensor for a wide range of clinical drugs: topoisomerases, PARP and replication inhibitors, and platinum derivatives. To expand the spectrum of drugs and pathways targeting SLFN11, we ran a high-throughput screen with 1,978 mechanistically annotated, oncology-focused compounds in two isogenic pairs of SLFN11-proficient and -deficient cells (CCRF-CEM and K562). We identified 29 hit compounds that selectively kill SLFN11-proficient cells, including not only previously known DNA-targeting agents, but also the neddylation inhibitor pevonedistat (MLN-4924) and the DNA polymerase α inhibitor AHPN/CD437, which both induced SLFN11 chromatin recruitment. By inactivating cullin-ring E3 ligases, pevonedistat acts as an anticancer agent partly by inducing unscheduled re-replication through supraphysiologic accumulation of CDT1, an essential factor for replication initiation. Unlike the known DNA-targeting agents and AHPN/CD437 that recruit SLFN11 onto chromatin in 4 hours, pevonedistat recruited SLFN11 at late time points (24 hours). While pevonedistat induced unscheduled re-replication in SLFN11-deficient cells after 24 hours, the re-replication was largely blocked in SLFN11-proficient cells. The positive correlation between sensitivity to pevonedistat and SLFN11 expression was also observed in non-isogenic cancer cells in three independent cancer cell databases (NCI-60, CTRP: Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal and GDSC: Genomic of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer). The present study reveals that SLFN11 not only detects stressed replication but also inhibits unscheduled re-replication induced by pevonedistat, thereby enhancing its anticancer efficacy. It also suggests SLFN11 as a potential predictive biomarker for pevonedistat in ongoing and future clinical trials.
- Open Access
- 3 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-15
Selective interactions at pre-replication complexes categorize baseline and dormant origins
DNA synthesis in metazoans initiates within a select group of replication origins (baseline origins), whereas other (dormant) origins do not initiate replication despite recruiting apparently indistinguishable pre-replication complexes. Dormant origins are activated as backups when DNA synthesis stalls, allowing for complete genome duplication, yet it is unclear how cells selectively differentiate between baseline and dormant origins. We report here that during unperturbed cell proliferation, dormant origins selectively bind phosphorylated RecQL4 (pRecQL4), a member of the RecQ helicase family mutated in Rothmund-Thomson, RAPADILINO and Baller-Gerold syndromes. Origin-bound pRecQL4 prevents the binding of an essential replication initiation complex, MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN, to dormant origins, thus restricting replication initiation to baseline origins. When cells encounter replication stress, pRecQL4 is required for the dissociation of the MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN complex from chromatin, which, in turn, facilitates the subsequent redistribution of MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN to both baseline and dormant origins and allows recovery from replication inhibition. Thus, the interactions between the MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN complex and pRecQL4 at replication origins are critical for replication origin choice and facilitate recovery from replication stress.
- 3 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-15
Open AccessSelective interactions at pre-replication complexes categorize baseline and dormant origins
DNA synthesis in metazoans initiates within a select group of replication origins (baseline origins), whereas other (dormant) origins do not initiate replication despite recruiting apparently indistinguishable pre-replication complexes. Dormant origins are activated as backups when DNA synthesis stalls, allowing for complete genome duplication, yet it is unclear how cells selectively differentiate between baseline and dormant origins. We report here that during unperturbed cell proliferation, dormant origins selectively bind phosphorylated RecQL4 (pRecQL4), a member of the RecQ helicase family mutated in Rothmund-Thomson, RAPADILINO and Baller-Gerold syndromes. Origin-bound pRecQL4 prevents the binding of an essential replication initiation complex, MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN, to dormant origins, thus restricting replication initiation to baseline origins. When cells encounter replication stress, pRecQL4 is required for the dissociation of the MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN complex from chromatin, which, in turn, facilitates the subsequent redistribution of MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN to both baseline and dormant origins and allows recovery from replication inhibition. Thus, the interactions between the MTBP-TICRR/TRESLIN complex and pRecQL4 at replication origins are critical for replication origin choice and facilitate recovery from replication stress.
- 19 February 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 639 (8056) , 1084-1092
Mechanism for local attenuation of DNA replication at double-strand breaks
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) disrupt the continuity of the genome, with consequences for malignant transformation. Massive DNA damage can elicit a cellular checkpoint response that prevents cell proliferation1,2. However, how highly aggressive cancer cells, which can tolerate widespread DNA damage, respond to DSBs alongside continuous chromosome duplication is unknown. Here we show that DSBs induce a local genome maintenance mechanism that inhibits replication initiation in DSB-containing topologically associating domains (TADs) without affecting DNA synthesis at other genomic locations. This process is facilitated by mediators of replication and DSBs (MRDs). In normal and cancer cells, MRDs include the TIMELESS–TIPIN complex and the WEE1 kinase, which actively dislodges the TIMELESS–TIPIN complex from replication origins adjacent to DSBs and prevents initiation of DNA synthesis at DSB-containing TADs. Dysregulation of MRDs, or disruption of 3D chromatin architecture by dissolving TADs, results in inadvertent replication in damaged chromatin and increased DNA damage in cancer cells. We propose that the intact MRD cascade precedes DSB repair to prevent genomic instability, which is otherwise observed when replication is forced, or when genome architecture is challenged, in the presence of DSBs3,4,5. These observations reveal a previously unknown vulnerability in the DNA replication machinery that may be exploited to therapeutically target cancer cells.
- 19 February 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 639 (8056) , 1084-1092
Mechanism for local attenuation of DNA replication at double-strand breaks
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) disrupt the continuity of the genome, with consequences for malignant transformation. Massive DNA damage can elicit a cellular checkpoint response that prevents cell proliferation1,2. However, how highly aggressive cancer cells, which can tolerate widespread DNA damage, respond to DSBs alongside continuous chromosome duplication is unknown. Here we show that DSBs induce a local genome maintenance mechanism that inhibits replication initiation in DSB-containing topologically associating domains (TADs) without affecting DNA synthesis at other genomic locations. This process is facilitated by mediators of replication and DSBs (MRDs). In normal and cancer cells, MRDs include the TIMELESS–TIPIN complex and the WEE1 kinase, which actively dislodges the TIMELESS–TIPIN complex from replication origins adjacent to DSBs and prevents initiation of DNA synthesis at DSB-containing TADs. Dysregulation of MRDs, or disruption of 3D chromatin architecture by dissolving TADs, results in inadvertent replication in damaged chromatin and increased DNA damage in cancer cells. We propose that the intact MRD cascade precedes DSB repair to prevent genomic instability, which is otherwise observed when replication is forced, or when genome architecture is challenged, in the presence of DSBs3,4,5. These observations reveal a previously unknown vulnerability in the DNA replication machinery that may be exploited to therapeutically target cancer cells.