Aušra Kazlauskienė
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Aušra Kazlauskienė has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Asta Vaičiūnienė
Institute of Education, Vilnius University Siauliai Academy, 76351 Siauliai, Lithuania
1 shared publication - Dalia Bagdžiūnienė
Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University
1 shared publication Dalia Nasvytienė
Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
1 shared publicationEmilija Sakadolskis
Educational Research Institute, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 November 2023
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 14, 1305979
Resources of emotional resilience and its mediating role in teachers’ well-being and intention to leave
The continuing attention of scholars and practitioners to the teaching profession, teachers and teaching is based above all on the fact that societal progress is impossible without an effective education system. Teachers are the “soft” dynamic, and at the same time, a driving force in this constantly changing system, and research into the prerequisites for their effective performance requires constant attention. In this study, the main phenomenon under analysis is the emotional resilience of teachers–the internal capacity to adapt, manage or cope with emotionally demanding situations. The purpose was to investigate work-related and personal resources that contribute to teachers’ emotional resilience and its role in the links between resources, teacher well-being, and the intention to leave. Data were collected using convenience sampling and included 522 teachers working in Lithuanian primary and secondary schools. An online self-administered questionnaire consisted of scales that assessed teachers’ job resources, self-efficacy, well-being, and intention to leave. The research revealed that perceived workplace characteristics – performance feedback, autonomy, social support, and opportunities for professional growth–along with self-efficacy were positively related and predicted teacher emotional resilience. Emotional resilience was found to be a direct positive predictor of teacher well-being along with job resources and self-efficacy and have a mediating effect on the relationships between work-related resources and self-efficacy as independent variables and teacher wellbeing as a dependent variable. Contrary to well-being is teachers’ intention to leave a school, which is usually an undesirable outcome for an organization. The study revealed that this intention is negatively affected by job resources and self-efficacy, however emotional resilience did not impact teachers’ intention to quit. Based on the results, the article outlines avenues for further research and provides implications for strengthening teachers’ emotional resilience.
- 21 November 2023
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 14, 1305979
Open AccessResources of emotional resilience and its mediating role in teachers’ well-being and intention to leave
The continuing attention of scholars and practitioners to the teaching profession, teachers and teaching is based above all on the fact that societal progress is impossible without an effective education system. Teachers are the “soft” dynamic, and at the same time, a driving force in this constantly changing system, and research into the prerequisites for their effective performance requires constant attention. In this study, the main phenomenon under analysis is the emotional resilience of teachers–the internal capacity to adapt, manage or cope with emotionally demanding situations. The purpose was to investigate work-related and personal resources that contribute to teachers’ emotional resilience and its role in the links between resources, teacher well-being, and the intention to leave. Data were collected using convenience sampling and included 522 teachers working in Lithuanian primary and secondary schools. An online self-administered questionnaire consisted of scales that assessed teachers’ job resources, self-efficacy, well-being, and intention to leave. The research revealed that perceived workplace characteristics – performance feedback, autonomy, social support, and opportunities for professional growth–along with self-efficacy were positively related and predicted teacher emotional resilience. Emotional resilience was found to be a direct positive predictor of teacher well-being along with job resources and self-efficacy and have a mediating effect on the relationships between work-related resources and self-efficacy as independent variables and teacher wellbeing as a dependent variable. Contrary to well-being is teachers’ intention to leave a school, which is usually an undesirable outcome for an organization. The study revealed that this intention is negatively affected by job resources and self-efficacy, however emotional resilience did not impact teachers’ intention to quit. Based on the results, the article outlines avenues for further research and provides implications for strengthening teachers’ emotional resilience.
- Open Access
- 10 October 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 13 (10) , 1020
Liberating and Oppressive Factors for Self-Directed Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of the key competencies that provides the conditions necessary for adjustments to changes in the social context, and it should be developed from the early years of schooling. The effect of SDL on learners’ motivation and attainments has been proven, and its value in enabling learners to change has been substantiated. When applying it in practice, difficulties are faced because SDL-based pedagogy sets challenges for both school students and teachers. It is important to carry out a systematic analysis investigating factors that provide the conditions for the self-directed learning of students. A systematic analysis (applying methods of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA)) allows us to emphasize that the liberating factors of SDL include learning environments (support/scaffolding, teaching and learning strategies, physical environment and technological resources, autonomy, assessment and self-assessment, feedback, sustainable and positive climate), obtained knowledge, abilities (self-efficacy, cognitive competence, time management, meta-learning skills), and the learner’s proactivity (collaboration, meeting learners’ needs, possibilities, search for learning support, and raising questions). The oppressive factors of SDL when dealing with learning environments for both learners and teachers (learning load, teaching and learning strategies, teacher power, anxiety, negative emotions, assessment, absence of feedback, control, lack of learning support) as well as educational institutions (teacher support, learning facilities, culture of encouragement and support) are discussed.
- 10 October 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 13 (10) , 1020
Open AccessLiberating and Oppressive Factors for Self-Directed Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of the key competencies that provides the conditions necessary for adjustments to changes in the social context, and it should be developed from the early years of schooling. The effect of SDL on learners’ motivation and attainments has been proven, and its value in enabling learners to change has been substantiated. When applying it in practice, difficulties are faced because SDL-based pedagogy sets challenges for both school students and teachers. It is important to carry out a systematic analysis investigating factors that provide the conditions for the self-directed learning of students. A systematic analysis (applying methods of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA)) allows us to emphasize that the liberating factors of SDL include learning environments (support/scaffolding, teaching and learning strategies, physical environment and technological resources, autonomy, assessment and self-assessment, feedback, sustainable and positive climate), obtained knowledge, abilities (self-efficacy, cognitive competence, time management, meta-learning skills), and the learner’s proactivity (collaboration, meeting learners’ needs, possibilities, search for learning support, and raising questions). The oppressive factors of SDL when dealing with learning environments for both learners and teachers (learning load, teaching and learning strategies, teacher power, anxiety, negative emotions, assessment, absence of feedback, control, lack of learning support) as well as educational institutions (teacher support, learning facilities, culture of encouragement and support) are discussed.