N. Schüler
N. Schüler has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
K. Dornich
Freiberg Instruments GmbH, Am St. Niclas Schacht 13, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
2 shared publications- Torsten Hahn
Institute of Theoretical Physics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Str. 23, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany
2 shared publications Bianca Gründig-Wendrock
SolarWorld Innovations GmbH, Berthelsdorfer Str. 111 A, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
1 shared publicationJ. R. Niklas
Freiberg Instruments GmbH 1 , Am St. Niclas Schacht 13, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
1 shared publicationJ.R. Niklas
Freiberg Instruments GmbH, Am St. Niclas Schacht 13, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
1 shared publicationS. Hahn
Freiberg Instruments GmbH 1 , Am St. Niclas Schacht 13, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 30 June 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
- Vol. 94 (6) , 1076-1080
Theoretical and experimental comparison of contactless lifetime measurement methods for thick silicon samples
- 30 June 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
- Vol. 94 (6) , 1076-1080
Theoretical and experimental comparison of contactless lifetime measurement methods for thick silicon samples
- 15 March 2010
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Applied Physics
- Vol. 107 (6) , 064901
Simulations of photoconductivity and lifetime for steady state and nonsteady state measurements
Contact less measurements of the minority carrier “lifetime” and the photoconductivity are widely used to characterize the material quality and to investigate defects in a sample. In order to interpret these measurements correctly and to guarantee comparability between different methods, numerical simulation tools were developed. These simulations allow to account even for very complex defect models, thus, e.g., enabling the simulation of trapping effects. Contrary to the Shockley–Read–Hall model or the widely used simulation tool PC1D nearly no assumptions are made. Furthermore, nonsteady state solutions can be obtained. The simulation approach is explained in detail, along with simulations of the trapping effect on the measured lifetime for different injections, trap parameters, and measuring methods, demonstrating the capabilities of the here presented simulation tool. Temperature and injection dependent lifetime measurements were performed and it is shown how important sample parameters can be extracted using the simulation tool. Additionally an approach is presented to simulate lifetimes for thick samples, where a nonuniform carrier profile has to be taken into account. This enables a comparison of nonsteady state to steady-state lifetime measurement techniques even for thick samples such as ingots.
- 15 March 2010
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Applied Physics
- Vol. 107 (6) , 064901
Simulations of photoconductivity and lifetime for steady state and nonsteady state measurements
Contact less measurements of the minority carrier “lifetime” and the photoconductivity are widely used to characterize the material quality and to investigate defects in a sample. In order to interpret these measurements correctly and to guarantee comparability between different methods, numerical simulation tools were developed. These simulations allow to account even for very complex defect models, thus, e.g., enabling the simulation of trapping effects. Contrary to the Shockley–Read–Hall model or the widely used simulation tool PC1D nearly no assumptions are made. Furthermore, nonsteady state solutions can be obtained. The simulation approach is explained in detail, along with simulations of the trapping effect on the measured lifetime for different injections, trap parameters, and measuring methods, demonstrating the capabilities of the here presented simulation tool. Temperature and injection dependent lifetime measurements were performed and it is shown how important sample parameters can be extracted using the simulation tool. Additionally an approach is presented to simulate lifetimes for thick samples, where a nonuniform carrier profile has to be taken into account. This enables a comparison of nonsteady state to steady-state lifetime measurement techniques even for thick samples such as ingots.