HSHiroyasu Shoda

Hiroyasu Shoda

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Hiroyasu Shoda has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    A Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Pneumonitis During Durvalumab Treatment in Locally Advanced NSCLC

    by Takeshi Masuda, Daisuke Kawahara, Wakako Daido, Nobuki Imano, Naoko Matsumoto, Kosuke Hamai, Yasuo Iwamoto, Yusuke Takayama, Sayaka Ueno, Masahiko Sumii, et al.

    Introduction: Pneumonitis represents one of the clinically significant adverse events observed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive durvalumab as consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Although clinical factors such as radiation dose (e.g., V20) and interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) have been reported as risk predictors, accurate and objective prognostication remains difficult. This study aimed to develop a radiomics-based machine learning model to predict grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with unresectable NSCLC who received CRT followed by durvalumab. Radiomic features, including first-order and texture and shape-based features with wavelet transformation were extracted from whole-lung regions on pre-durvalumab computed tomography (CT) images. Machine learning models, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, neural networks, and naïve Bayes classifiers were developed and evaluated using a testing cohort. Model performance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation. Conventional predictors, including V20 and ILAs, were also assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Among 123 patients, 44 (35.8%) developed grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. The best-performing model, a support vector machine, achieved an AUC of 0.88 and accuracy of 0.81, the conventional model showed lower performance with an AUC of 0.71 and accuracy of 0.64. Conclusions: Radiomics-based machine learning demonstrated superior performance over clinical parameters in predicting pneumonitis. This approach may enable individualized risk stratification and support early intervention in patients with NSCLC.

  • Open Access

    Efficacy and Safety of Re-administration of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) After EGFR-TKI-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease (CS-Lung-005)

    by Nobuhiro Kanaji, Eiki Ichihara, Takaaki Tanaka, Takashi Ninomiya, Toshiyuki Kozuki, Nobuhisa Ishikawa, Kazuya Nishii, Hiroyasu Shoda, Kakuhiro Yamaguchi, Keita Kawakado, et al.

    Purpose: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) re-administration after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study collected data from consecutive advanced NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR-TKI re-administration after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. Results: Fifty-eight patients were registered. The grades of initial TKI-induced ILD were grade 1 to 4. TKIs used for re-administration were erlotinib for 15 patients, osimertinib for 15, gefitinib for 14, afatinib for 13 patients, and dacomitinib for 1 patient. ILD recurred in 13 patients (22.4%), comprising 3 patients with grade 1, 6 patients with grade 2, and 4 patients with grade 3. No significant associations were found between ILD recurrence and age, smoking history, performance status, time from initial ILD to TKI re-administration, or concomitant corticosteroid use. However, the incidence of ILD recurrence was high in cases of repeated use of gefitinib or erlotinib or first time use of osimertinib at TKI re-administration. The ILD recurrence rate was lowest in patients treated with first time use of gefitinib (8%) or erlotinib (8%), followed by patients treated with repeated use of osimertinib (9%). The response rate, median progression-free survival by TKI re-administration, and median overall survival were 55%, 9.6 and 84.8 months, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that EGFR-TKI re-administration is a feasible and effective treatment for patients who recovered from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. Our results indicate that re-administration of EGFR-TKI is an important option for long-term prognosis after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.


  • Open Access

    Pre-Existing Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Are Independent Risk Factors for Interstitial Lung Disease during Durvalumab Treatment after Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    by Wakako Daido, Takeshi Masuda, Nobuki Imano, Naoko Matsumoto, Kosuke Hamai, Yasuo Iwamoto, Yusuke Takayama, Sayaka Ueno, Masahiko Sumii, Hiroyasu Shoda, et al.

    Introduction/Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a life-threatening toxicity caused by these treatments; however, risk factors for the ILD have not yet been established. Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are computed tomography (CT) findings which manifest as minor interstitial shadows. We aimed to investigate whether ILAs could be risk factors for grade-two or higher ILD during durvalumab therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with NSCLC who received durvalumab after CRT from July 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. We obtained patient characteristics, laboratory data, radiotherapeutic parameters, and chest CT findings before durvalumab therapy. Results: A total of 148 patients were enrolled. The prevalence of ILAs before durvalumab treatment was 37.8%. Among 148 patients, 63.5% developed ILD during durvalumab therapy. The proportion of patients with grade-two or higher ILD was 33.8%. The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age, high dose-volume histogram parameters, and the presence of ILAs were significant risk factors for grade-two or higher ILD. The multivariate analysis showed that ILAs were independent risk factors for grade-two or higher ILD (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.69–7.72; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We showed that pre-existing ILAs are risk factors for ILD during durvalumab treatment after CRT. We should pay attention to the development of grade-two or higher ILD during durvalumab treatment in patients with ILAs.