Yinsheng Tian
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Yinsheng Tian has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kaiyu Zhang
Beijing Institute of Technology, 47833 Beijing, Beijing China
2 shared publications Anqi Dong
Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication- Anqi Dong
AI Sports Engineering Lab., School of Sports Engineering, Beijing Sport University, 48 Xinxi Road, Beijing 100084, China
1 shared publication - Changda Lu
School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication Dexing Qian
Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication- Dexing Qian
School of Sports Engineering, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 April 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-9
A new kinematic dataset of lower limbs action for balance testing
Balance is a common performance but nevertheless an essential part of performance analysis investigations in ski. Many skier pay attention to the training of balance ability in training. Inertial Measurement Unit, as a kind of Multiplex-type human motion capture system, is widely used because of its humanized human-computer interaction design, low energy consumption and more freedom provided by the environment. The purpose of this research is to use sensor to establish a kinematics dataset of balance test tasks extracted from skis to help quantify skier’ balance ability. Perception Neuron Studio motion capture device is used in present. The dataset contains a total of 20 participants’ data (half male) of the motion and sensor data, which is collected at a 100 Hz sampling frequency. To our knowledge, this dataset is the only one that uses a BOSU ball in the balance test. We hope that this dataset will contribute to multiple fields of cross-technology integration in physical training and functional testing, including big-data analysis, sports equipment design and sports biomechanical analysis.
- 14 April 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-9
Open AccessA new kinematic dataset of lower limbs action for balance testing
Balance is a common performance but nevertheless an essential part of performance analysis investigations in ski. Many skier pay attention to the training of balance ability in training. Inertial Measurement Unit, as a kind of Multiplex-type human motion capture system, is widely used because of its humanized human-computer interaction design, low energy consumption and more freedom provided by the environment. The purpose of this research is to use sensor to establish a kinematics dataset of balance test tasks extracted from skis to help quantify skier’ balance ability. Perception Neuron Studio motion capture device is used in present. The dataset contains a total of 20 participants’ data (half male) of the motion and sensor data, which is collected at a 100 Hz sampling frequency. To our knowledge, this dataset is the only one that uses a BOSU ball in the balance test. We hope that this dataset will contribute to multiple fields of cross-technology integration in physical training and functional testing, including big-data analysis, sports equipment design and sports biomechanical analysis.
- Open Access
Development and Evaluation of a Full-Waveform Resistance Training Monitoring System Based on a Linear Position Transducer
Recent advances in training monitoring are centered on the statistical indicators of the concentric phase of the movement. However, those studies lack consideration of the integrity of the movement. Moreover, training performance evaluation needs valid data on the movement. Thus, this study presents a full-waveform resistance training monitoring system (FRTMS) as a whole-movement-process monitoring solution to acquire and analyze the full-waveform data of resistance training. The FRTMS includes a portable data acquisition device and a data processing and visualization software platform. The data acquisition device monitors the barbell’s movement data. The software platform guides users through the acquisition of training parameters and provides feedback on the training result variables. To validate the FRTMS, we compared the simultaneous measurements of 30–90% 1RM of Smith squat lifts performed by 21 subjects with the FRTMS to similar measurements obtained with a previously validated three-dimensional motion capture system. Results showed that the FRTMS produced practically identical velocity outcomes, with a high Pearson’s correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and coefficient of multiple correlations and a low root mean square error. We also studied the applications of the FRTMS in practical training by comparing the training results of a six-week experimental intervention with velocity-based training (VBT) and percentage-based training (PBT). The current findings suggest that the proposed monitoring system can provide reliable data for refining future training monitoring and analysis.
Open AccessDevelopment and Evaluation of a Full-Waveform Resistance Training Monitoring System Based on a Linear Position Transducer
Recent advances in training monitoring are centered on the statistical indicators of the concentric phase of the movement. However, those studies lack consideration of the integrity of the movement. Moreover, training performance evaluation needs valid data on the movement. Thus, this study presents a full-waveform resistance training monitoring system (FRTMS) as a whole-movement-process monitoring solution to acquire and analyze the full-waveform data of resistance training. The FRTMS includes a portable data acquisition device and a data processing and visualization software platform. The data acquisition device monitors the barbell’s movement data. The software platform guides users through the acquisition of training parameters and provides feedback on the training result variables. To validate the FRTMS, we compared the simultaneous measurements of 30–90% 1RM of Smith squat lifts performed by 21 subjects with the FRTMS to similar measurements obtained with a previously validated three-dimensional motion capture system. Results showed that the FRTMS produced practically identical velocity outcomes, with a high Pearson’s correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and coefficient of multiple correlations and a low root mean square error. We also studied the applications of the FRTMS in practical training by comparing the training results of a six-week experimental intervention with velocity-based training (VBT) and percentage-based training (PBT). The current findings suggest that the proposed monitoring system can provide reliable data for refining future training monitoring and analysis.
- Open Access
A Quantitative Assessment Grading Study of Balance Performance Based on Lower Limb Dataset
Balance ability is one of the important factors in measuring human physical fitness and a common index for evaluating sports performance. Its quality directly affects the coordination ability of human movements and plays an important role in human productive activities. In the field of sports, balance ability is an important indicator of athletes’ selection and training. How to objectively analyze balance performance becomes a problem for every non-professional sports enthusiast. Therefore, in this paper, we used a dataset of lower limb collected by inertial sensors to extract the feature parameters, then designed a RUS Boost classifier for unbalanced data whose basic classifier was SVM model to predict three classifications of balance degree, and, finally, evaluated the performance of the new classifier by comparing it with two basic classifiers (KNN, SVM). The result showed that the new classifier could be used to evaluate the balanced ability of lower limb, and performed higher than basic ones (RUS Boost: 72%; KNN: 60%; SVM: 44%). The results meant the established classification model could be used for and quantitative assessment of balance ability in initial screening and targeted training.
Open AccessA Quantitative Assessment Grading Study of Balance Performance Based on Lower Limb Dataset
Balance ability is one of the important factors in measuring human physical fitness and a common index for evaluating sports performance. Its quality directly affects the coordination ability of human movements and plays an important role in human productive activities. In the field of sports, balance ability is an important indicator of athletes’ selection and training. How to objectively analyze balance performance becomes a problem for every non-professional sports enthusiast. Therefore, in this paper, we used a dataset of lower limb collected by inertial sensors to extract the feature parameters, then designed a RUS Boost classifier for unbalanced data whose basic classifier was SVM model to predict three classifications of balance degree, and, finally, evaluated the performance of the new classifier by comparing it with two basic classifiers (KNN, SVM). The result showed that the new classifier could be used to evaluate the balanced ability of lower limb, and performed higher than basic ones (RUS Boost: 72%; KNN: 60%; SVM: 44%). The results meant the established classification model could be used for and quantitative assessment of balance ability in initial screening and targeted training.
- Open Access
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Perception Neuron Studio for Upper-Body Motion Capture
The Perception Neuron Studio (PNS) is a cost-effective and widely used inertial motion capture system. However, a comprehensive analysis of its upper-body motion capture accuracy is still lacking, before it is being applied to biomechanical research. Therefore, this study first evaluated the validity and reliability of this system in upper-body capturing and then quantified the system’s accuracy for different task complexities and movement speeds. Seven participants performed simple (eight single-DOF upper-body movements) and complex tasks (lifting a 2.5 kg box over the shoulder) at fast and slow speeds with the PNS and OptiTrack (gold-standard optical system) collecting kinematics data simultaneously. Statistical metrics such as CMC, RMSE, Pearson’s r, R2, and Bland–Altman analysis were utilized to assess the similarity between the two systems. Test–retest reliability included intra- and intersession relations, which were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as well as CMC. All upper-body kinematics were highly consistent between the two systems, with CMC values 0.73–0.99, RMSE 1.9–12.5°, Pearson’s r 0.84–0.99, R2 0.75–0.99, and Bland–Altman analysis demonstrating a bias of 0.2–27.8° as well as all the points within 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The relative reliability of intra- and intersessions was good to excellent (i.e., ICC and CMC were 0.77–0.99 and 0.75–0.98, respectively). The paired t-test revealed that faster speeds resulted in greater bias, while more complex tasks led to lower consistencies. Our results showed that the PNS could provide accurate enough upper-body kinematics for further biomechanical performance analysis.
Open AccessA Comprehensive Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Perception Neuron Studio for Upper-Body Motion Capture
The Perception Neuron Studio (PNS) is a cost-effective and widely used inertial motion capture system. However, a comprehensive analysis of its upper-body motion capture accuracy is still lacking, before it is being applied to biomechanical research. Therefore, this study first evaluated the validity and reliability of this system in upper-body capturing and then quantified the system’s accuracy for different task complexities and movement speeds. Seven participants performed simple (eight single-DOF upper-body movements) and complex tasks (lifting a 2.5 kg box over the shoulder) at fast and slow speeds with the PNS and OptiTrack (gold-standard optical system) collecting kinematics data simultaneously. Statistical metrics such as CMC, RMSE, Pearson’s r, R2, and Bland–Altman analysis were utilized to assess the similarity between the two systems. Test–retest reliability included intra- and intersession relations, which were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as well as CMC. All upper-body kinematics were highly consistent between the two systems, with CMC values 0.73–0.99, RMSE 1.9–12.5°, Pearson’s r 0.84–0.99, R2 0.75–0.99, and Bland–Altman analysis demonstrating a bias of 0.2–27.8° as well as all the points within 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The relative reliability of intra- and intersessions was good to excellent (i.e., ICC and CMC were 0.77–0.99 and 0.75–0.98, respectively). The paired t-test revealed that faster speeds resulted in greater bias, while more complex tasks led to lower consistencies. Our results showed that the PNS could provide accurate enough upper-body kinematics for further biomechanical performance analysis.