Christiana L. Cheng

Objective: The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) standardizes the timing and content of walking assessments during inpatient rehabilitation by combining 12 stages ranging from lowest to highest function (0, 0.5, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 4) with 5 standard measures: the Berg Balance Scale, the modified Timed “Up & Go” test, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, the modified 6-Minute Walk Test, and the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT). This study aimed to determine if the SWAT at rehabilitation discharge could predict outdoor walking capacity 1-year after discharge in people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Methods: This retrospective study used data obtained from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry from 2014 to 2020. Community outdoor walking capacity was measured using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) outdoor mobility score obtained 12 (±4) months after discharge. Of 206 study participants, 90 were community nonwalkers (ie, SCIM III score 0–3), 41 were community walkers with aids (ie, SCIM III score 4–6), and 75 were independent community walkers (ie, SCIM III score 7–8). Bivariate, multivariable regression, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. Results: At rehabilitation discharge, 3 significant SWAT associations were confirmed: 0–3A with community nonwalkers, 3B/higher with community walkers with and without an aid, and 4 with independent community walkers. Moreover, at discharge, a higher (Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale), faster (modified Timed “Up & Go,” 10MWT), or further (10MWT) SWAT measure was significantly associated with independent community walking. Multivariable analysis indicated that all SWAT measures, except the 10MWT were significant predictors of independent community walking. Furthermore, the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic score (0.91), demonstrating an excellent ability to distinguish community walkers with aids from independent community walkers. Conclusion: The SWAT stage and measures at discharge can predict community outdoor walking capacity in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Notably, a patient’s confidence in performing activities plays an important part in achieving walking ability in the community. Impact: The discharge SWAT is useful to optimize discharge planning.

Background: To describe the key findings and lessons learned from an international pilot study that surveyed spinal cord injury programs in acute and rehabilitation facilities to understand the status of spinal cord injury care. Methods: An online survey with two questionnaires, a 74-item for acute care and a 51-item for rehabilitation, was used. A subset of survey items relevant to the themes of specialized care, timeliness, patient-centeredness, and evidence-based care were operationalized as structure or process indicators. Percentages of facilities reporting the structure or process to be present, and percentages of indicators met by each facility were calculated and reported separately for facilities from high-income countries (HIC) and from low and middle-income countries (LMIC) to identify “hard to meet” indicators defined as those met by less than two-thirds of facilities and to describe performance level. Results: A total of 26 acute and 26 rehabilitation facilities from 25 countries participated in the study. The comparison of the facilities based on the country income level revealed three general observations: 1) some indicators were met equally well by both HIC and LMIC, such as 24-hour access to CT scanners in acute care and out-patient services at rehabilitation facilities; 2) some indicators were hard to meet for LMIC but not for HIC, such as having a multidisciplinary team for both acute and rehabilitation settings; and 3) some indicators were hard to meet by both HIC and LMIC, including having peer counselling programs. Variability was also observed for the same indicator between acute and rehabilitation facilities, and a wide range in the total number of indicators met among HIC facilities (acute 59–100%; rehabilitation 36–100%) and among LMIC facilities (acute: 41–82%; rehabilitation: 36–93%) was reported. Conclusions: Results from this international pilot study found that the participating acute and rehabilitation facilities on average adhered to 74% of the selected indicators, suggesting that the structure and processes to provide ideal traumatic spinal cord injury care were broadly available. Recruiting a representative sample of SCI facilities and incorporating regional attributes in future surveys will be helpful to examine factors affecting adherence to indicators.