Eric M. Toloza
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Eric M. Toloza has a total of 127 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Frank O. Velez-Cubian
16 shared publicationsCarla C. Moodie
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
15 shared publicationsJoseph R. Garrett
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
15 shared publicationsJacques P. Fontaine
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
12 shared publications- Jacques P. Fontaine
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Departments of Surgery, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; Departments of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
9 shared publications Emily P. Ng
Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
6 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 5 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Thoracic Surgery Clinics
- Vol. 36 (2) , 133-140
Manubrial Resection and Reconstruction
- 5 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Thoracic Surgery Clinics
- Vol. 36 (2) , 133-140
Manubrial Resection and Reconstruction
- Open Access
- 24 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 3 (3)
Top 50 most influential publications in robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
- 24 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 3 (3)
Open AccessTop 50 most influential publications in robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
- Open Access
- 26 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery in Practice and Science
- Vol. 18, 100250
Marital status shows no protective effect on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
- 26 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery in Practice and Science
- Vol. 18, 100250
Open AccessMarital status shows no protective effect on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
- Open Access
Association between the Preoperative Standard Uptake Value (SUV) and Survival Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Background: Lung-sparing procedures, specifically segmentectomies and wedge resections, have increased over the years to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigate here the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-assisted segmentectomy (RAS) at an NCI-designated cancer center and aim to show associations between the preoperative standard update value (SUV) to tumor stage, recurrence patterns, and overall survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 166 consecutive patients who underwent RAS at a single institution from 2010 to 2021. Of this number, 121 robotic-assisted segmentectomies were performed for primary NSCLC, and a total of 101 patients were evaluated with a PET-CT scan. The SUV from the primary tumor was determined from the PET-CT. The clinical, surgical, and pathologic profiles and perioperative outcomes were summarized via descriptive statistics. Numerical variables were described as the median and interquartile range because all numerical variables were not normally distributed as assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test of normality. Categorical variables were described as the count and proportion. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used for association. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves were constructed to visualize the OS and RFS, which were also stratified according to tumor histology, the pathologic stage, and standard uptake value. A log-rank test for the equality of survival curves was performed to determine significant differences between groups. Results: The most common postoperative complications were atrial fibrillation (8.8%, 9/102), persistent air leak (7.84%, 8/102), and pneumonia (4.9%, 5/102). The median operative duration was 168.5 min (IQR 59), while the median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (IQR 125). The conversion rate to thoracotomy in this cohort was 3.9% (4/102). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.9% (3/102). The median hospital length of stay was 3 days (IQR 3). The median chest tube duration was 3 days (IQR 2), but 4.9% (5/102) of patients were sent home with a chest tube. The recurrence for this cohort was 28.4% (29/102). The time to recurrence was 353 days (IQR 504), while the time to mortality was 505 days (IQR 761). The NSCLC patients were divided into the following two groups: low SUV (n = 55) and high SUV (≥5, n = 47). Statistically significant associations were noted between SUV and the tumor histology (p = 0.019), tumor grade (p = 0.002), lymph-vascular invasion (p = 0.029), viscera-pleural invasion (p = 0.008), recurrence (p < 0.001) and the site of recurrence (p = 0.047). KM survival analysis showed significant differences in the curves for OS (log-rank p-value 0.0204) and RFS (log-rank p-value 0.0034) between the SUV groups. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted segmentectomy for NSCLC has reasonable perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate here the prognostic implication of preoperative SUV to pathologic outcomes, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.
Open AccessAssociation between the Preoperative Standard Uptake Value (SUV) and Survival Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Background: Lung-sparing procedures, specifically segmentectomies and wedge resections, have increased over the years to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigate here the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-assisted segmentectomy (RAS) at an NCI-designated cancer center and aim to show associations between the preoperative standard update value (SUV) to tumor stage, recurrence patterns, and overall survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 166 consecutive patients who underwent RAS at a single institution from 2010 to 2021. Of this number, 121 robotic-assisted segmentectomies were performed for primary NSCLC, and a total of 101 patients were evaluated with a PET-CT scan. The SUV from the primary tumor was determined from the PET-CT. The clinical, surgical, and pathologic profiles and perioperative outcomes were summarized via descriptive statistics. Numerical variables were described as the median and interquartile range because all numerical variables were not normally distributed as assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test of normality. Categorical variables were described as the count and proportion. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used for association. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves were constructed to visualize the OS and RFS, which were also stratified according to tumor histology, the pathologic stage, and standard uptake value. A log-rank test for the equality of survival curves was performed to determine significant differences between groups. Results: The most common postoperative complications were atrial fibrillation (8.8%, 9/102), persistent air leak (7.84%, 8/102), and pneumonia (4.9%, 5/102). The median operative duration was 168.5 min (IQR 59), while the median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (IQR 125). The conversion rate to thoracotomy in this cohort was 3.9% (4/102). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.9% (3/102). The median hospital length of stay was 3 days (IQR 3). The median chest tube duration was 3 days (IQR 2), but 4.9% (5/102) of patients were sent home with a chest tube. The recurrence for this cohort was 28.4% (29/102). The time to recurrence was 353 days (IQR 504), while the time to mortality was 505 days (IQR 761). The NSCLC patients were divided into the following two groups: low SUV (n = 55) and high SUV (≥5, n = 47). Statistically significant associations were noted between SUV and the tumor histology (p = 0.019), tumor grade (p = 0.002), lymph-vascular invasion (p = 0.029), viscera-pleural invasion (p = 0.008), recurrence (p < 0.001) and the site of recurrence (p = 0.047). KM survival analysis showed significant differences in the curves for OS (log-rank p-value 0.0204) and RFS (log-rank p-value 0.0034) between the SUV groups. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted segmentectomy for NSCLC has reasonable perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate here the prognostic implication of preoperative SUV to pathologic outcomes, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.
- Open Access
- 25 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery in Practice and Science
- Vol. 15
Residential Distance to the Cancer Center and Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy
- 25 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery in Practice and Science
- Vol. 15
Open AccessResidential Distance to the Cancer Center and Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy
- 1 May 2023
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
- p. A1277
Top 50 Most Influential Publications on Navigational Bronchoscopy
- 1 May 2023
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
- p. A1277
Top 50 Most Influential Publications on Navigational Bronchoscopy
- Open Access
- 24 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery in Practice and Science
- Vol. 13, 100172
Changes in Perioperative Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy during the COVID-19 Era
- 24 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery in Practice and Science
- Vol. 13, 100172
Open AccessChanges in Perioperative Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy during the COVID-19 Era
- 27 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Geriatric Oncology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 101470
Effect of octogenarian status on outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy for primary lung cancer
- 27 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Geriatric Oncology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 101470
Effect of octogenarian status on outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy for primary lung cancer
- 1 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 226 (1) , 128-132
Effects of preoperative pulmonary function on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
- 1 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 226 (1) , 128-132
Effects of preoperative pulmonary function on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
- Open Access
- 23 February 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 15 (2) , e35379
Effect of Surgical Day of Week on Postoperative Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy
Introduction Patients who have surgery late in the week could potentially receive different postoperative care due to a reduced weekend staff compared to patients who have surgery early in the week, who will be cared for by a full staff during the work week. Our aim was to determine if patients who underwent robotic-assisted video-thoracoscopic (RAVT) pulmonary lobectomy during the first half of the week had different outcomes than patients who also underwent RAVT pulmonary lobectomy during the second half of the week. Methods We analyzed 344 consecutive patients who underwent RAVT pulmonary lobectomy by one surgeon from 2010 to 2016. Depending on the day of the surgical procedure, these patients were either put into a Monday through Wednesday (M-W) group or a Thursday through Friday (Th-F) group. Patient demographics, tumor histopathology, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups using the Student’s t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or chi-square (or Fisher’s exact) test, with p≤0.05 as significant. Results There were more non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) resected in the M-W group than in the Th-F group (p=0.005). Skin-to-skin and total operative times were greater for the Th-F group than for the M-W group (p=0.027 and p=0.017, respectively). There were no significant differences in any other variables assessed. Conclusions Our study showed that, despite reduced weekend staffing and potential differences in postoperative care, there were no significant differences seen in postoperative complications or perioperative outcomes based on surgical day of the week.
- 23 February 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 15 (2) , e35379
Open AccessEffect of Surgical Day of Week on Postoperative Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy
Introduction Patients who have surgery late in the week could potentially receive different postoperative care due to a reduced weekend staff compared to patients who have surgery early in the week, who will be cared for by a full staff during the work week. Our aim was to determine if patients who underwent robotic-assisted video-thoracoscopic (RAVT) pulmonary lobectomy during the first half of the week had different outcomes than patients who also underwent RAVT pulmonary lobectomy during the second half of the week. Methods We analyzed 344 consecutive patients who underwent RAVT pulmonary lobectomy by one surgeon from 2010 to 2016. Depending on the day of the surgical procedure, these patients were either put into a Monday through Wednesday (M-W) group or a Thursday through Friday (Th-F) group. Patient demographics, tumor histopathology, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups using the Student’s t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or chi-square (or Fisher’s exact) test, with p≤0.05 as significant. Results There were more non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) resected in the M-W group than in the Th-F group (p=0.005). Skin-to-skin and total operative times were greater for the Th-F group than for the M-W group (p=0.027 and p=0.017, respectively). There were no significant differences in any other variables assessed. Conclusions Our study showed that, despite reduced weekend staffing and potential differences in postoperative care, there were no significant differences seen in postoperative complications or perioperative outcomes based on surgical day of the week.