Yeung-Chul Mun
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Yeung-Chul Mun has a total of 722 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jin Seok Kim
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
21 shared publications Jae Hoon Lee
Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea
20 shared publicationsHawk Kim
Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, South Korea
17 shared publications- Jungwon Huh
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
17 shared publications Young Rok Do
Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine
17 shared publicationsJae-Yong Kwak
Chonbuk National University Medical School & Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea
16 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Cancer Journal
- Vol. 16 (1)
Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma across Asia: a multicenter Asian Myeloma Network study (AMN010)
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Cancer Journal
- Vol. 16 (1)
Open AccessReal-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma across Asia: a multicenter Asian Myeloma Network study (AMN010)
- Open Access
- 29 July 2026
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 209 (4) , 1955-1959
Long‐term efficacy and safety of romiplostim plus immunosuppressive therapy as first‐line treatment in patients with aplastic anaemia: 2‐year interim analysis of observational study of two clinical trials
- 29 July 2026
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 209 (4) , 1955-1959
Open AccessLong‐term efficacy and safety of romiplostim plus immunosuppressive therapy as first‐line treatment in patients with aplastic anaemia: 2‐year interim analysis of observational study of two clinical trials
- Open Access
- 25 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Upfront versus Delayed Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Acquired Aplastic Anemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first-line therapy in elderly patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) remains uncertain. While immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is the standard initial treatment for patients aged ≥40 years, recent evidence suggests that upfront alloHCT may offer improved outcomes. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 173 Korean patients aged ≥40 years who underwent alloHCT between 1999 and 2017. Patients received either upfront alloHCT without prior IST (n=66) or delayed alloHCT following IST failure or relapse (n=107). The upfront group had a higher rate of matched sibling donors (78.8% vs. 50.5%, p<0.001) and shorter time to transplant (median, 3.4 vs. 8.3 months; p=0.046). Rates of engraftment, hematopoietic recovery, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were comparable. Five-year overall survival was higher in the upfront group (73.5% vs. 56.4%, p=0.059). In multivariate analysis, upfront alloHCT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.476; p=0.004) and ECOG performance status ≤1 (HR, 4.736; p<0.001) were independently associated with improved survival. These findings suggest that upfront alloHCT may be a viable first-line option for selected elderly AA patients and support re-evaluation of treatment algorithms that currently prioritize IST.
- 25 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Open AccessUpfront versus Delayed Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Acquired Aplastic Anemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first-line therapy in elderly patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) remains uncertain. While immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is the standard initial treatment for patients aged ≥40 years, recent evidence suggests that upfront alloHCT may offer improved outcomes. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 173 Korean patients aged ≥40 years who underwent alloHCT between 1999 and 2017. Patients received either upfront alloHCT without prior IST (n=66) or delayed alloHCT following IST failure or relapse (n=107). The upfront group had a higher rate of matched sibling donors (78.8% vs. 50.5%, p<0.001) and shorter time to transplant (median, 3.4 vs. 8.3 months; p=0.046). Rates of engraftment, hematopoietic recovery, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were comparable. Five-year overall survival was higher in the upfront group (73.5% vs. 56.4%, p=0.059). In multivariate analysis, upfront alloHCT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.476; p=0.004) and ECOG performance status ≤1 (HR, 4.736; p<0.001) were independently associated with improved survival. These findings suggest that upfront alloHCT may be a viable first-line option for selected elderly AA patients and support re-evaluation of treatment algorithms that currently prioritize IST.
- Open Access
- 14 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (10) , 2901
Initial Low-Dose Hydroxyurea and Anagrelide Combination in Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparable Response with Lower Toxicity
Background and Objectives: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that overproduces platelets and is associated with life-threatening thrombosis. Medical cytoreduction either with hydroxyurea (HU) or anagrelide (AG) is widely used, but drug intolerance or resistance are major concerns. Low-dose combination of HU and AG as an alternative strategy has been explored in various studies. It showed comparable response with acceptable toxicity in second-line settings for patients who experienced side effects from prior monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upfront combination for ET patients. Materials and Methods: From January 2018 to June 2022, a total of 241 ET patients with intermediate to high risk were enrolled. We identified 21 patients with initial drug combinations and compared treatment outcomes and adverse events (AEs) between combination and monotherapy groups. Results: The median age was 62 years old (range, 26–87) and median platelet count was 912 × 109/L (range, 520–1720). Overall treatment response did not exhibit significant differences between the groups, although there was a trend towards a lower response rate in patients treated with AG alone at 3 months post-treatment (AG + HU, 85.7% vs. AG alone, 75.4%, p = 0.068). AEs of any grade occurred in 52.3% of the combination group, 44.3% of the HU monotherapy group, and 43.4% of the AG single group, respectively. Of note was that the HU plus AG combination group suffered a lower incidence of grade 3–4 AEs compared to the other two groups, with statistical significance (p = 0.008 for HU monotherapy vs. combination therapy and p < 0.01 for AG monotherapy vs. combination therapy). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that the upfront low-dose combination approach showed feasible clinical outcomes with significantly lower severe AEs compared to conventional monotherapy. These results may offer valuable insights to clinicians for future prospective investigations.
- 14 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (10) , 2901
Open AccessInitial Low-Dose Hydroxyurea and Anagrelide Combination in Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparable Response with Lower Toxicity
Background and Objectives: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that overproduces platelets and is associated with life-threatening thrombosis. Medical cytoreduction either with hydroxyurea (HU) or anagrelide (AG) is widely used, but drug intolerance or resistance are major concerns. Low-dose combination of HU and AG as an alternative strategy has been explored in various studies. It showed comparable response with acceptable toxicity in second-line settings for patients who experienced side effects from prior monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upfront combination for ET patients. Materials and Methods: From January 2018 to June 2022, a total of 241 ET patients with intermediate to high risk were enrolled. We identified 21 patients with initial drug combinations and compared treatment outcomes and adverse events (AEs) between combination and monotherapy groups. Results: The median age was 62 years old (range, 26–87) and median platelet count was 912 × 109/L (range, 520–1720). Overall treatment response did not exhibit significant differences between the groups, although there was a trend towards a lower response rate in patients treated with AG alone at 3 months post-treatment (AG + HU, 85.7% vs. AG alone, 75.4%, p = 0.068). AEs of any grade occurred in 52.3% of the combination group, 44.3% of the HU monotherapy group, and 43.4% of the AG single group, respectively. Of note was that the HU plus AG combination group suffered a lower incidence of grade 3–4 AEs compared to the other two groups, with statistical significance (p = 0.008 for HU monotherapy vs. combination therapy and p < 0.01 for AG monotherapy vs. combination therapy). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that the upfront low-dose combination approach showed feasible clinical outcomes with significantly lower severe AEs compared to conventional monotherapy. These results may offer valuable insights to clinicians for future prospective investigations.
- 22 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Leukemia
- Vol. 38 (2) , 451-454
Interleukin-15 and -21-activated, donor-derived NK cell infusion after haploidentical HCT in high-risk AML and MDS—a cohort analysis
- 22 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Leukemia
- Vol. 38 (2) , 451-454
Interleukin-15 and -21-activated, donor-derived NK cell infusion after haploidentical HCT in high-risk AML and MDS—a cohort analysis
- Open Access
- 26 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Cancer Journal
- Vol. 13 (1) , 1-8
Real-world data of long-term survival in patients with T-cell lymphoma who underwent stem cell transplantation
This study aimed to identify the benefits of autologous-stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) and allogeneic-SCT (allo-SCT) in patients with aggressive T-cell lymphomas to aid in the selection of transplantation type in clinical practice. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 598 patients who underwent transplantation for T-cell lymphomas from 2010 to 2020. In total, 317 patients underwent up-front SCT as consolidation therapy. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.7% and 76.1%, respectively. Patients who underwent auto-SCT had significantly better OS (p = 0.026) than those who underwent allo-SCT; however, no statistical difference in PFS was found. Transplantation was used as a salvage therapy in 188 patients who had relapsed/refractory disease. Overall, 96 (51.1%) patients underwent auto-SCT and 92 (48.9%) patients underwent allo-SCT. Auto-SCT improved long-term survival in patients with complete remission (CR). Allo-SCT demonstrated better 3-year PFS in patients with partial remission and relapsed/refractory disease status. However, >50% of patients died within 1 year of allo-SCT. As a consolidative therapy, up-front auto-SCT demonstrated a survival benefit. Auto-SCT was also effective in patients who achieved CR after salvage therapy. If the disease persists or cannot be controlled, allo-SCT may be considered with reduced intensity conditioning.
- 26 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Cancer Journal
- Vol. 13 (1) , 1-8
Open AccessReal-world data of long-term survival in patients with T-cell lymphoma who underwent stem cell transplantation
This study aimed to identify the benefits of autologous-stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) and allogeneic-SCT (allo-SCT) in patients with aggressive T-cell lymphomas to aid in the selection of transplantation type in clinical practice. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 598 patients who underwent transplantation for T-cell lymphomas from 2010 to 2020. In total, 317 patients underwent up-front SCT as consolidation therapy. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.7% and 76.1%, respectively. Patients who underwent auto-SCT had significantly better OS (p = 0.026) than those who underwent allo-SCT; however, no statistical difference in PFS was found. Transplantation was used as a salvage therapy in 188 patients who had relapsed/refractory disease. Overall, 96 (51.1%) patients underwent auto-SCT and 92 (48.9%) patients underwent allo-SCT. Auto-SCT improved long-term survival in patients with complete remission (CR). Allo-SCT demonstrated better 3-year PFS in patients with partial remission and relapsed/refractory disease status. However, >50% of patients died within 1 year of allo-SCT. As a consolidative therapy, up-front auto-SCT demonstrated a survival benefit. Auto-SCT was also effective in patients who achieved CR after salvage therapy. If the disease persists or cannot be controlled, allo-SCT may be considered with reduced intensity conditioning.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2023
- Published by XMLink in Journal of Korean Medical Science
- Vol. 38 (41) , e328
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and High Disease Burden: Real-World Data From Korea
Kim JS, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep;38:e328. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e328
- 1 January 2023
- Published by XMLink in Journal of Korean Medical Science
- Vol. 38 (41) , e328
Open AccessLong-Term Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and High Disease Burden: Real-World Data From Korea
Kim JS, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep;38:e328. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e328
- 22 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Vol. 57 (12) , 1797-1802
Optimal timing of treatment at relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMM-1909)
The effectiveness of early treatment for biochemical relapse of multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. To clarify this issue, this retrospective study was performed to evaluate the survival outcomes of 315 patients with relapsed MM after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Over a median follow-up of 66.6 months (range, 15.1–195.5 months), 48.2% of patients showed biochemical relapse, 41.3% showed clinical relapse, and 10.5% showed significant biochemical relapse. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were inferior for patients with clinical relapse compared to the other patients. Multivariate analysis showed that clinical relapse was an independent prognostic factor for OS. In patients with biochemical relapse, there was no significant difference in survival between patients treated while asymptomatic and those treated once clinical symptoms had appeared. Relapse type after upfront ASCT was a significant prognostic factor in patients with MM. In addition, no survival benefit of early treatment at biochemical relapse was observed, but a triplet regimen may be beneficial for MM patients with biochemical relapse.
- 22 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Vol. 57 (12) , 1797-1802
Optimal timing of treatment at relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMM-1909)
The effectiveness of early treatment for biochemical relapse of multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. To clarify this issue, this retrospective study was performed to evaluate the survival outcomes of 315 patients with relapsed MM after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Over a median follow-up of 66.6 months (range, 15.1–195.5 months), 48.2% of patients showed biochemical relapse, 41.3% showed clinical relapse, and 10.5% showed significant biochemical relapse. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were inferior for patients with clinical relapse compared to the other patients. Multivariate analysis showed that clinical relapse was an independent prognostic factor for OS. In patients with biochemical relapse, there was no significant difference in survival between patients treated while asymptomatic and those treated once clinical symptoms had appeared. Relapse type after upfront ASCT was a significant prognostic factor in patients with MM. In addition, no survival benefit of early treatment at biochemical relapse was observed, but a triplet regimen may be beneficial for MM patients with biochemical relapse.
- Open Access
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Research
- Vol. 57 (1) , 20-28
Management of immune thrombocytopenia: 2022 update of Korean experts recommendations
Young Hoon Park, Dae-Young Kim, Seongkoo Kim, Young Bae Choi, Dong-Yeop Shin, Jin Seok Kim, Won Sik Lee, Yeung-Chul Mun, Jun Ho Jang, Jong Wook Lee, Hoon Kook, on behalf of Korean Aplastic Anemia Working Party. Blood Res 2022;57:20-8. https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2022.2022043
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Research
- Vol. 57 (1) , 20-28
Open AccessManagement of immune thrombocytopenia: 2022 update of Korean experts recommendations
Young Hoon Park, Dae-Young Kim, Seongkoo Kim, Young Bae Choi, Dong-Yeop Shin, Jin Seok Kim, Won Sik Lee, Yeung-Chul Mun, Jun Ho Jang, Jong Wook Lee, Hoon Kook, on behalf of Korean Aplastic Anemia Working Party. Blood Res 2022;57:20-8. https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2022.2022043
- Open Access
- 17 March 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
- Vol. 28 (3) , S408-S409
Busulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) As Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High Risk Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study By the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL)
- 17 March 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
- Vol. 28 (3) , S408-S409
Open AccessBusulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) As Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High Risk Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study By the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL)